MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 2036

Thread: The GT300/Fermi Thread

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Amman, Jordan
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
    While disappointing that here are no easy to read benchmarks, it's possible to discern general performance from a few key points: The HAWX benchmark in the deep dive slides and the FARCRY2 GF100 vs. GTX285 video. (Check out guru3d's video of the Farcry2 benchmark for extra info). GF100 is ~ 68% faster in FC2, and 61% faster in HAWX, both using 4xAA, compared to a GTX285.

    HD5870 is ~35% faster than a GTX285 1920 4xAA, according to Computerbase.de. Also, an HD5970 is ~90% faster than a GTX285. The tested GF100 part sits between a HD5870 & HD5970, closer towards the speed of the 5970. And it appears GF100 handles 8xAA better than HD5000. I rank them as so:

    GTX285: 100%
    HD5870: 135%
    GTX3xx: 168%
    HD5970: 190%



    and for the price...

    Nvidia scenario
    GTX285: 100% - 400
    HD5870: 135% - 400
    GTX3xx: 168% - 672
    HD5970: 190% - 700

    ATI scenario
    GTX285: 100% - 400
    HD5870: 135% - 400
    GTX3xx: 168% - 600
    HD5970: 190% - 700

    my scenario
    GTX285: 100% - 400
    HD5870: 135% - 400
    GTX3xx: 168% - 650
    HD5970: 190% - 700

    edit: based on the Dark Void benchmark it's 180% faster than the 285 not 168%?
    Last edited by firas; 01-18-2010 at 12:50 AM.
    Q9550 E0 @3.8 - zalman CNPS9700 NT - GA-EP45-UD3R rev 1.1 - OCZ Reaper 2x2GB DDR2 1066
    GTX 285 SSC - Thermaltake Toughpower 850W - Samsung 2220WM 22" LCD - win7 x64


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •