Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
I found what I was talking about:

"The situation is this: in some cases, Nehalem can go from being much faster than Phenom II, to being measurably slower within the same benchmark depending on resolution. Gary was the first to tie the issue to the GPU used. Gary found that NVIDIA GPUs appeared to behave this way on Nehalem/Phenom II while AMD GPUs didn't. In other words, NVIDIA GPUs were running faster on AMD hardware while AMD GPUs were running faster on Intel hardware. It's all very strange."

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=3640&p=3
AMD GPUs were running faster on Intel hardware.
You know you are not proving your point with this right , quite opposite actually .Instead of bashing each other results , post more information Driver release and so on ... Am sorry whole simulated , doesn't really interest me , it doesnt mean fermi isn't a good performer ,but am sure it is to benefit of some people ,especially at release, to make numbers look more groundbreaking rather then marginal ...

Also am sure fermi has a way to go with drivers as well.