Dude, do you know how to read? Like I stated, there is no problem with keeping cuda on the gpu. They only need to add enough performance to make games that use it run good and smooth. 3d games today dont need the amount of gpgpu power as a server farm. That way they can focus on making efficient 3D graphics cards in a competitive market. Making huge dies that cater to the scientific/workstation market and selling them to consumers to browse the internet isnt a smart buisiness plan. If I need the power of a server farm Ill buy a gpu that can handle that, but if I want to play games, give me something to do just that and do it well for a good price! The only way to do this is to make different cards for there purposes. Look at ati they have 2 different dies to serve different markets. How is gt300 suppose to be competitive with juniper, a card that costs 1/5 to make and a 1/4 of the size. You dont have to be a genius to see whats wrong here, but oh yeah your dislexic. So here is a way to make you understand better, Nvidia has bigger dies and costs alot more to make. That way they can make more money selling the same big card against a tiny ati card.




Reply With Quote
Bookmarks