Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
And..?

I'm still correct, CUDA (ie:Fermi's architecture) doesn't matter to 99.9% of the end-user... just to Nvidia, who doesn't have an X86 processor!

3 billion transistors... for Nvidia's business model, not for our gaming pleasure!
So you want NV, to just die a slow death? Well of course you do xoulz, you hate Nvidia.

Nv is simpy trying to make outlets for cash since, it going to be left out in the cold alot more when everyone integrates GPU on onto a CPU, those slowing down cpu sales.

Adding to the equation is Larrabee, which is invading NV retail space and NV has to do something, just in case larrabee does destroy everything out their
By your logic, AMD, although a cpu company had no damn right to even challenge Intel as a CPU company based on differences in the size.

Do you think Intel has no right to enter the GPU market, because they are a CPU company too?

Man people really hate NV. But when you look back at it, Intel has done some much shadier stuff than both NV and AMD. Yet people love them. Bribery and using clout to make sure your CPU have an unfair advantage, Intel wrote the book on this.

y marketing? AMD and Intel have both done this. Amd's most recent slides were taking shots at NV like no tommorow. They have essentially bought Charlie(his website contains only AMD ads) and are using him to push their propaganda. Don't you think it is dirty to start rumors to lower your competitors stock price? Even NV hasn't sunk that low yet.

The whole renaming thing got a little carried away but really ripped no one off, because most people didn't rebuy the same card contrary to what the haters think and they typically always dropped the price of their card and put it in a lower target segment when they did this.

Sure it removes a bit of focus that the card is not a direct x 10.1 card, but really did people miss that much from not getting direct x 10.1. If anything this hurt NV more because it made the transition to direct x 11 a bit more difficult.