first venice and now this s7? good job!
first venice and now this s7? good job!
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
Exactly what I was thinking, welcome back s7e9h3n!Originally Posted by St Devious
Have you been in the future?
BTW I love the Task Manager screenshot with 24threads!
As someone said, where in Europe are you?
i7 2600k @4500 | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 | Gskill 2x4096Mb 2133Mhz | 4x2TB WD Green RAID10 | OCZ Vertex3 120Gb | 2x AMD 6950 @ Stock
Benq 24" TN | Samsung LE46C630 "2nd" Monitor | Enermax NAXN ENP850EWT | Corsair 800D Case | Corsair H60 | Logitech G9x + Wireless Solar K750
Whoops--almost forgot about this. Here's a run at default for me. I think I must be doing something wrong. Not sure how strongly effected by ECC this is, either. I run with ECC set to maximum protection. Come to think of it, this may be with underclocked memory. Let me check...Yes, it would be good to know if K10stat works for this CPU. I have a feelings it will work exactly like it does on Particle's Istanbul setup. I think all these server CPUs are hard wired for their clocks and voltages just like Istanbul is. Probably won't be able to overclock unfortunately.
Default: 12x2200, DDR2-800, ECC Off...not a whole lot better
Last edited by Particle; 09-09-2009 at 11:01 PM.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Ohh thanks, those results look like single socket vs. dual channel.
Do you really have all four channels populated and ran with 12 threads? Beside that with six cores sharing two channels this benchmark is heavi imc speed limited. My 955be and also the AII 240 and 250 get best results if the nb runs one notch below the cpu. I hit a limit once the nb speed reaches 2xmem speed, so the optimum with ddr3 1333 is 2.8GHz/2.6GHz cpu/nb. If it's the same with DDR2 you should not be limited by the stock nb speed however since it's already above 1.6GHz.
Beside that I think only this ES has unlocked multis and voltages and the retail chips will be locked so using k10stats or similar to modify these settings on the chips msr register will not work and oc capability will be limited by the max possible ref HT the boards will offer.
@s7: I'm curious, what msr register did you modify? Was it the controll register or the p-state-0 register?
FASN8ing(times 3).
I really hope some of these new G34/C32 boards will be made with "XS
people" in mind.
Definitely sounds like there is a 2P market here.
Many thanks for sharing S7.
World Community Grid's mission is to create the world's largest public computing grid to tackle projects that benefit humanity.
Our success depends upon individuals collectively contributing their unused computer time to change the world for the better.
- Dual Opteron 2427s (Istanbul) @ 2.2GHz CPU/2.2GHz NBOhh thanks, those results look like single socket vs. dual channel.
Do you really have all four channels populated and ran with 12 threads?
- Each CPU has two 2GB DDR2-800 DIMMs installed in dual channel configuration
The numbers are just lower than I'd expect.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
can you run 3dmark 06?
Particle, Maybe it has something to do with the chipset difference?
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
Check your numa settings in the bios you should get around 20MB/s in that benchmark, just like the other dual socket shanghai/istanbul setups.
So someone finally noticed...
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15552/1/
SweClockers.com
CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
GPU: HD 5770
Hehe This thread started so long ago I'd completely forgotten to watch Fudo. I thought they'd pick it up quicker.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Didn't they get it wrong though? this is 2x CPUs right? And all of the benches were run with 2 CPUs right?
E7200 @ 4.0ghz 1.29vcore
2x 6870
OCZ 4gb @ 5-4-4-12 846mhz
Looks like the CPUs were definitely throttling:
This run is over 1 sec faster than @ 3ghz.
Don't know how much I'll be playing with the setup today as I'm dead tired from my trip.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Do you have better cooling on them now?
Could you please test with WPrime v1.55, then it's easier to compare to hwbot.
![](http://www.hwbot.org/signature/u15466.png height="110" )
can u try Cinebench run? And winrar benchmark?Looks like the CPUs were definitely throttling:
This run is over 1 sec faster than @ 3ghz.
Don't know how much I'll be playing with the setup today as I'm dead tired from my trip.
wprime is better with the same HT: NB (2000:2000, 2400:2400 etc). Example with 2000MHz HT and 2600MHz at NB is run whorse. But i think, u know it
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
WPrime 1.55 seems to have issues detecting the proper number of cores.....Do you have better cooling on them now?
Could you please test with WPrime v1.55, then it's easier to compare to hwbot.
.....so does the Winrar bench:can u try Cinebench run? And winrar benchmark?
wprime is better with the same HT: NB (2000:2000, 2400:2400 etc). Example with 2000MHz HT and 2600MHz at NB is run whorse. But i think, u know it
Cinebench has the same problem as well...don't have a screenshot at them moment, but I'll post one later....
BTW, same stock coolers...just less VcoreDo you have better cooling on them now?
Could you please test with WPrime v1.55, then it's easier to compare to hwbot.
You're way too ahead of the pack with your gear, software can't cope with you
Crosshair IV Formula
Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
C300 64G
Corsair TX 850W
CM HAF 932
That 1 MB is inaccessible so no point seeing it as 2x 6 MB L3.http://i.cmpnet.com/eetimes/news/09/08/AMD_chart.gif
probe filter takes 1 meg!
we need new rev of CPUz
have your tried setting it Manually on both ?WPrime 1.55 seems to have issues detecting the proper number of cores.....
.....so does the Winrar bench:
Cinebench has the same problem as well...don't have a screenshot at them moment, but I'll post one later....
HAVE NO FEAR!
"AMD fallen angel"
You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.
Lol...no...I guess I'll try that now...thought these programs would be a bit "smarter than that
I think he can't adjust it.can u try Cinebench run? And winrar benchmark?
wprime is better with the same HT: NB (2000:2000, 2400:2400 etc). Example with 2000MHz HT and 2600MHz at NB is run whorse. But i think, u know it
This is not an overclockers board......if he could adjust he wouldn't be writing scripts to OC all cores he would just flip multis in bios
S7 advanced tab on wprime 1.55, set to 24 cores
heatware chew*
I've got no strings to hold me down.
To make me fret, or make me frown.
I had strings but now I'm free.
There are no strings on me
Yep...frequencies aren't adjustable. Only multi:I think he can't adjust it.
This is not an overclockers board......if he could adjust he wouldn't be writing scripts to OC all cores he would just flip multis in bios
S7 advanced tab on wprime 1.55, set to 24 cores
1.55 seems a lot slower:
Any programs out there that adjust memory timings?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks