MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 690

Thread: Intel's 34nm NAND SSDs launch in two weeks

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    191
    Quote Originally Posted by Rhys View Post
    Thought there was going to be 2x more 4k random write performance than G1???
    I just had to look once at the Intel G1 numbers to see they where way off, the 80gb G1 and the 80gb G2 have pretty much the same performance, even if the G2 firmware is supposedly better on G2, manipulation of numbers to put it mildly.... Those 3.300 IOPS are probably from the PDF/whitepaper before the G1 release , in a used state or worse, because 3300IOPS@QD#32 4kb random write is a "broken" G1...



    There is one reason to swap G1 for a G2, and that is TRIM, from a performance standpoint it's no reason to swap, not unless you desperately want the 20mb/s higher sequential write of the 160gb G2, the TRIM G2 firmware is ~3 months away anyway... Intel saw early that the only way to boost sales here is to do some "magic" with the numbers on G1 and exclude them from TRIM, and the tactic worked like a charm.... I won't bite though, atleast not untill the TRIM G2 firmware is actually out, because just now I have the performance already in 2xG1, and I'm gonna keep the G1's anyway as an apps/game array so I don't care about the 2. hand prices...

    If any competitor can promise TRIM and deliver a drive with performance in the ballpark of the G1/G2 within the 2-3 month timeframe for this TRIM firmware, they will get my money..
    Last edited by Ourasi; 07-27-2009 at 05:11 PM.
    | Ci7 2600k@4.6ghz | Asus SaberTooth P67 | Sapphire HD7970 | Samsung B555 32" | Samsung 840 PRO 128gb + 2xIntel SSD 520 120GB Raid0 + 2xC300 64GB Raid0 | Corsair Vengeance 16GB DDR3-1600 8-8-8-24 | Vantage GPU=40250 |

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •