yeah, i just don't get it. as you said, one more month. 16 trademarks at 3000€ each, that's 48000€. that's a substantial amount of money with which to gamble. and, as soon as they sent the cease and desist letters to the smaller companies, the companies would have been forced to close their accounts with the respective manufacturers thus alerting them to the shenanigans. at which point, lawyers would have been contacted and respective accounts pulled. third party rebranding would have been aquatunings only route. startup for manufacturing would have been very costly--too costly, it seems, for that to be their intentions...i suppose some anonymous third party backer could have been supporting the cause, but still, that just seems like a stretch. i agree, third party purchasing and rebranding seems to be the most viable reason for their actions.
however, all just speculation. one thing is certain, though...speculation or no, they've definitely sh*t the bed with this one. the above known actions are unethical enough to warrant boycott. and, as has been shown, the water cooling consumer seems to have unprecedented loyalty.





Bookmarks