-
RAID-0 SSD vs Raptor
Summary: OCZ Vertexes in RAID-0 outperform WD Raptors in RAID-0 by a factor of four.
Both RAID block sizes are set to 128k, because the X38 onboard RAID controller doesn't allow larger sizes.
Pay close attention to the scale of the graphs. They are very different.
My first test was using HD Tach in compatibility mode. I like HD Tach, but it made me nervous to use it in compatibility mode.
Vertex Results:

Raptor Results:

Then, I ran an Everest "read suite" test on both:

Finally, I did an HD Tune on both volumes using the default 64k chunk size (let me know if any of you want different chunk sizes tested; these can dramatically affect performance in RAID-0)
Vertex Results (notice the access times pegged at the bottom):

Raptor Results (not sure about the down-spike):

Finally, you can see that all of Vista with drivers installed leaves plenty of room for other stuff on the SSDs. Note that the Raptors are currently empty (perfect place for program files) and that I have a networked drive for all media/backup stuff in case my RAIDs die. Also, note the 80GB drive (e:\), whose sole function is to handle the pagefile.

New benchie with 512 byte-size blocks in HD Tune:
Vertexes:

Raptors:
Last edited by Dostoyevsky77; 04-24-2009 at 03:42 PM.
Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 3DMark: 2006 18,426 Vantage P13,913
E8400 4.23GHz (470x9, 1.40v, Tuniq 120, lapped + Silverstone 121)
EVGA GTX280 (670/2430/1458) EVGA 9600GT (675/1800/1674)
ASUS Rampage Formula X38 0407 (Hacked Maximus 1.03G)
4x1GB Ballistix PC2-8500 (1128MHz, 5-4-4-12-2T, 2.20v)
Tagan 1.1kW, 2xRaptor 150 (RAID-0), Fatal1ty Platinum
System Gallery
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks