-
I have been experimenting with MEM, an observing some strange results. After long and heavy MEM-testing, loose tRAS seams to play a bigger role (bigger than what we are used to on CD2) for MEM-stability at higher BCLK.
I have been testing with 8 instance av 50MB memtest 3.8, and have made these observations:
@4GHZ(211x19) HT:on:
@1266 7-7-7-20 1.65v fails (same with tRAS 21 to 24). I didn't test higher tRAS.
@1266 6-6-6-18 fails (same with tRAS 19 to 29), but tRAS 30 passes
@3.8GHZ (200x19) HT:on:
@1200 7-7-7-20 1.65v fails, but tRAS 21 passes
@1200 6-6-6-18 1.65v fails (same with tRAS 19 to 23), but tRAS 24 passes
Almost all fails accrued in 60% to 70% during the memtest.
Loose tRAS seams to be play a big role on MEM-stability at higher BCLK (at least on my CPU and RAM) and seams to have some effect on Vcore too. After i got it stabilized @1266 6-6-6-30 1.65v, i could prime "pass the kill zone" with 1.32v @4GZ(211x19) Ht:On, with is "several notch" lower than the previous Vcore requirement (1.34v).
Anybody else has observed similar behavior?
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks