Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
this nice but I would really like to point out that 12mb cache is a 25% more then deneb. If the Q9400 we could see a the difference cache makes it york field, since it's improved over conroe and conroe 4mb was 10% faster then then ones with 2mbs of cache.

if intel can make a Q8200 to compete with Agena, with the same amount of cache I'm sure they can make an 8mb cache york field too.
What are you implying? All this talk about cache size makes no sense. The 12MB cache costs more, because of the obvious speed boost. What stops AMD from incorporating 24MB onto their cpus, besides design limits? Besides, the Q6600 has 8MB cache too.