MMM
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 127

Thread: Quad Core Round Up: AMD Vs Intel Clock to Clock(deneb vs agena + deneb vs intel)

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by accord99 View Post
    But then neither will current Intel users have any need to switch to AMD in light of the performance and power usage of Phenom II. And given the last 2.5 years, this favors Intel.
    maybe depends what cpu they have and what motherboard they have, etc.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    current amd users will have no need to switch unless they feel like they should get i7 and even if the performance of yorkfield and deneb are the same no one will want to upgrade to a dead platform especially when deneb's platform will be cheaper. i don't see deneb coming out and being amazing but i do believe it will increase amd's market share from what it is now.
    Yup, I agree about the first part; although, LGA775 won't be a dead platform for awhile to come. I think its lifespan compared to AM2 will be very similar. I also don't see Yorkfield and Deneb performing the same, at least from the charts we've seen thus far. The lead by Yorkfield isn't dramatic, but it's consistent.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    yea clock to clock it seems yorkfield edges out deneb but it would be nice to see more benchmarks and games, etc. plus the cpus might get better after being out for awhile. but if deneb can overclock higher than yorkfield it might be a key point. idk you can only hope at this point but it doesn't seem like deneb will be what it was hyped up to be. its good but not perfect.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    tell me 2 screenshots that you want from deneb scores @ 3.7ghz(225*16.5 nb clock & ht link @ 2250 to provide to you right now.


    Your proof is @ 64bit.
    I was running 32bit.
    Next time read more careful

    You have answered this in another thread also.
    It may seem that certain posters have an inability to digest information.
    It would help if they removed their dark green tinted sunglasses.

    To other ranting posters about PHII being "bad".
    I disagree.
    If AMD lowers the prices a little after the intial sellout to the fanboi-teams, they have a very competing product in Deneb.
    They will drop right into most AM2-board hence saving *a lot* compared to going the "Intel-ci7-route" (as long as there is only extremely high priced X58-board available).

    PS/Edit:
    Yorkies are also quite high priced compared to ci7 and PHII.

    3DMarknn - 79506/96025/33499/25592

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    tell me 2 screenshots that you want from deneb scores @ 3.7ghz(225*16.5 nb clock & ht link @ 2250 to provide to you right now.


    Your proof is @ 64bit.
    I was running 32bit.
    Next time read more careful
    This VGA is GTX260 !
    Can you bench with HD4870x2. I want to see
    AMD Dragon = RD790+SB750+PII 940+R700XT.
    Thank you !
    When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
    When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
    When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
    When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)
    by John Fruehe

  6. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    yea clock to clock it seems yorkfield edges out deneb but it would be nice to see more benchmarks and games, etc. plus the cpus might get better after being out for awhile. but if deneb can overclock higher than yorkfield it might be a key point. idk you can only hope at this point but it doesn't seem like deneb will be what it was hyped up to be. its good but not perfect.
    And remember all the abuse and insults you directed at me when I said pretty much exactly that?

  7. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    That pretty much confirms what I already knew. A complete slaughter. I hope I'm wrong, but from where I'm sitting I'm seeing the end of AMD, and the beginning of huge price increases and complete market takeover.
    It has often been said that Intel can't afford to let AMD fail completely because the Federal Govt would then classify them as a monopoly and then interfere with them.

    I wonder how much truth there is to that point of view?

    I would still wait till some other reviews show up before declaring a "complete slaughter", but it is increasingly looking like AMD's fate depends on what Intel wants to do with them.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,083
    Hmm, desktop comparisons are well and good but AMD's fate will be decided by how their server model competes with nehalem xeon parts.
    TJ07 | Corsair HX1000W | Gigabyte EX58 Extreme | i7 930 @ 4ghz | Ek Supreme | Thermochill PA 120.3 | Laing DDC 12v w/ mod plexi top | 3x2gb Corsair 1600mhz | GTX 680 | Raid 0 300gb Velociraptor x 2 | Razer Lachesis & Lycosa | Win7 HP x64 | fluffy dice.

  9. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Xello View Post
    Hmm, desktop comparisons are well and good but AMD's fate will be decided by how their server model competes with nehalem xeon parts.
    How do you work that out?

    They can't get by forever just on the server market, not with the make up and cost structure they currently have.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Strive for peace w/Acts of War
    Posts
    868
    Reconfirms my purchase of my q6600 being epic.

    Its just mind blowing that even now, AMD has not caught up to Kentsfield. Good step in the right direction though.
    Yes, the Q6600 is an EPIC processor, and by non other than the best company in the world: Intel.

    Good direction would've been two years ago but to this date, it's too little too late, but then again, this is why the green company has had a long time track record of pulling such stunts, well deserve, they get it. Yoda!


    And it's safe to say that these CPUs won't be costing $700 to $1000 now that they still can't catch up to Intel's new big guns. LOL. X2 3800+ $550, now? $32.99........LMAO.
    ASUS P5B Deluxe P965 BIOS 1236 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 8MBL2 @ 3.15GHZ | G.Skill DDR2 800 F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ & XTreem DDR 800 D9GMH - 4GB RAM Total | 4:5 Ratio @ 350fsbx9 | Tuniq Tower 120 | BFG GeForce 9800GTX | Seagate 2x 250GB Perpendicular HDDs RAID-0 | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W EPS12V | Samsung TOC T240 24" LCD Monitor |

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Chad Boga View Post
    And remember all the abuse and insults you directed at me when I said pretty much exactly that?
    you weren't saying the exact thing. you were arguing in ways of why deneb wasn't going to be good. i remember you saying that it wasn't going to be that great because all it was was a die shrink and a larger cache. from what we have seen its much more than that with how well it can overclock. but we cool?
    Quote Originally Posted by Nasgul View Post
    Yes, the Q6600 is an EPIC processor, and by non other than the best company in the world: Intel.

    Good direction would've been two years ago but to this date, it's too little too late, but then again, this is why the green company has had a long time track record of pulling such stunts, well deserve, they get it. Yoda!


    And it's safe to say that these CPUs won't be costing $700 to $1000 now that they still can't catch up to Intel's new big guns. LOL. X2 3800+ $550, now? $32.99........LMAO.
    you would think that you would want to try to sound less like a fanboy if you actually wanted people to take your comments seriously.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    Quote Originally Posted by stangracin2 View Post
    you cant call that a slaughter considering amd beat the i7 in a few benches and tied it in a few more.
    thank you! it seems like some people didn't even read the article
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  13. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    you weren't saying the exact thing. you were arguing in ways of why deneb wasn't going to be good. i remember you saying that it wasn't going to be that great because all it was was a die shrink and a larger cache. from what we have seen its much more than that with how well it can overclock. but we cool?
    I was saying its IPC increase wouldn't be that much more significant than is usually the case with shrinks and cache increases and specifically said that 15 to 20% IPC increase claims were ludicrous.

    You and others were outraged I was making such claims.

    I never stated it would be a poor overclocker.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    Terrific review guys, cheers...^^

    Shouldn't this be in the Xtreme News or AMD subforum though?

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    228
    This is the clock-for-clock comparison for Agena and Deneb.



  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Dante80 View Post
    Terrific review guys, cheers...^^

    Shouldn't this be in the Xtreme News or AMD subforum though?
    it was in news at the start but then it got moved. and 5% ipc? hmmmmmm

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    170
    Put some 2.4+ at deneb's nothbridge and u will see how far behind is the phenom II...(i've seen 920 phenom II @ 2.6 easily...)

    I'm pretty sure every intel guy would do this in his kentsfield/yorkfield when he would overclock....(if they had one )

    So i'm pretty sure phenom II has some aces in his sleeve....
    Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
    Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
    Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
    Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
    Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
    Psu:Corsair Hx620
    Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
    Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...

  18. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Spain (Valencia) - UK (Manchester)
    Posts
    81
    Vozer, could you make the deneb vs kentsfeld and deneb vs yorkfield comparison? and if you have time, yorkfield vs kentsfield...
    Last edited by noki; 01-04-2009 at 11:39 AM.

  19. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    Put some 2.4+ at deneb's nothbridge and u will see how far behind is the phenom II...(i've seen 920 phenom II @ 2.6 easily...)

    I'm pretty sure every intel guy would do this in his kentsfield/yorkfield when he would overclock....(if they had one )

    So i'm pretty sure phenom II has some aces in his sleeve....
    We have the fsb, and look what it does!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.jpg 
Views:	401 
Size:	190.7 KB 
ID:	92177  

  20. #45
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    170
    U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
    Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
    @ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
    Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...

    @64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
    Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
    Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
    Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
    Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
    Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
    Psu:Corsair Hx620
    Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
    Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by Dante80 View Post
    Terrific review guys, cheers...^^

    Shouldn't this be in the Xtreme News or AMD subforum though?
    It was at news section but(i dont know the reason) someone moved it

  22. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by leoy View Post
    U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
    Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
    @ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
    Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...

    @64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
    Maybe you're dense; all the same, chew on this:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cinebench32gf7.jpg 
Views:	390 
Size:	135.5 KB 
ID:	92179   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Untitled.jpg 
Views:	391 
Size:	190.7 KB 
ID:	92180  

  23. #48
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 800mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...

    Edit 2: sorry was gonna say 400/500 at first then changed it.
    Last edited by Caveman787; 01-04-2009 at 02:00 PM.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 400mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
    yes its a completely horrible comparison since how i have seen many more. it seems hes just picking the best yorkfield he can find and then find the worst phenom II benchmark out with the absolute worst settings. and the phenom has 800 mhz ram not 400.

  25. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.

    Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.

    Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 400mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
    Sigh! Please point us to the evidence that more ram helps cinebench. If anything, my NB is being tasked with such high fsb and 8Gbs. This is my everyday system and this is currently the hardware config. that's all. Of course, you guys can consider this a target when you get your PIIs. All you hear is excuses, DDR3, Expensive, Hot, etc.

    This is a Q9550 with 8GB of cheap DDR2 ram at DDR2 990Mhz with loose timings.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •