Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 458

Thread: NVIDIA GTX295 Preview/Review

  1. #126
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    Too late? Ati wont have anything till Q2 2009, its not late at all. Nvidia is in good position right now, with the GTX 285 and new GTX 260 coming out, they should be in good shape.
    there is no new gtx 260

  2. #127
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Florida..Tampa and St Petersburg
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    there is no new gtx 260
    thats weird because a 55nm revision seems kinda of new...not to mention nvidia is going to let manufacturers make there own designs for the cards like new heat sinks and pcb colours and zotac is rumored to make a 1.5gb version of the 260..i also heard that nvidia is dropping the 192sp version and 216sp,s will be standard...i guess were see what happens next month
    Last edited by VOID WARRANTY; 12-18-2008 at 12:21 PM.
    i7 920 4.2ghz..6gb 1600mhz cas 7 memory..Windows 7 Ultimate Edition..Windows XP..650 watt PS..Water..3DFX Voodoo 3

  3. #128
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    not sure its worth step up from bfg gtx260-216 and paying £200 for extra 10-15fps in games like crysis warhead hmmmm will hold out see what other cards they bring out.

  4. #129
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    Quote Originally Posted by dan7777 View Post
    not sure its worth step up from bfg gtx260-216 and paying £200 for extra 10-15fps in games like crysis warhead hmmmm will hold out see what other cards they bring out.
    I think a lot of people are wondering the same thing. The core 216 was a buying point for many people. Step up was also a big consideration since many have that option now. Question is, is it worth it?

    I think this is kinda bogus how the GTX295 reviews are out, but gtx285 reviews and 265 (if it exists) is not out. I was hoping to step-up, but not till I have the info.

    Dan7777, I'm in the same boat. I do not see a point steping up AND spending 150+ USD on a new card for a 10% gain. If these cards are not 25% better than the ones we have now, I don't know if I could justify it.
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  5. #130
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    407
    Until we see microstuttering tests, all these comparisons are useless. How many of you guys are liking the taste of crow now that Nvidia is releasing a dual GPU card WAY before spring/summer 09?

  6. #131
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by gojirasan View Post
    Until we see microstuttering tests, all these comparisons are useless. How many of you guys are liking the taste of crow now that Nvidia is releasing a dual GPU card WAY before spring/summer 09?
    Enjoying my crow here but dear god why does Nvidia insist on crippling their memory? Seems rushed ...GX2 part Deux electric boogaloo.

  7. #132
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Looks like the new fastest card. It's not a terribly compelling upgrade for me though considering all the new stuff right around the corner.


    Also, Nvidia should have taken FO3 off their list.

  8. #133
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Looks like the new fastest card. It's not a terribly compelling upgrade for me though considering all the new stuff right around the corner.


    Also, Nvidia should have taken FO3 off their list.
    so it is new fastest card in certain games

  9. #134
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    so it is new fastest card in certain games
    Don't be foolish. That's how it always is. The 4870x2 was the fastest in only in certain games too, it was a big list though. There are always going to be exceptions to any architecture's reign.

  10. #135
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    Where is the ****ing GTX285 reviews? Stats even? This is getting ridiculous.
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  11. #136
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Don't be foolish. That's how it always is. The 4870x2 was the fastest in only in certain games too, it was a big list though. There are always going to be exceptions to any architecture's reign.
    and how many games we saw in previews to make it fastest card in the world ? lets see : dead space far cry crysis fall out left 4 dead thats it ? and lets look at in game benchs :

    http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

    lost in 2 won in one

  12. #137
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller View Post
    Where is the ****ing GTX285 reviews? Stats even? This is getting ridiculous.
    IMO, the only reason nV even allowed the GTX295 previews was to stunt some of the 4870x2's christmas sales. Since the GTX285 isn't faster then the x2 there would be no point in releasing early info on that.

  13. #138
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    and how many games we saw in previews to make it fastest card in the world ? lets see : dead space far cry crysis fall out left 4 dead thats it ? and lets look at in game benchs :

    http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

    lost in 2 won in one
    Yes, lets.

    Their charts show the minimum framerates for both cards dipping below 10 on a number of occasions yet their results at the bottom of each chart show MUCH more than that.

  14. #139
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    there is no new gtx 260
    Expreview said there will be a new GTX260 55nm from Zotac

    http://en.expreview.com/2008/12/05/f...html#more-1550


    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 12-18-2008 at 01:29 PM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  15. #140
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Yes, lets.

    Their charts show the minimum framerates for both cards dipping below 10 on a number of occasions yet their results at the bottom of each chart show MUCH more than that.
    their charts are broken from what i understand look at numbers below (if thats true gtx295 dips to 2 fps )

  16. #141
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    their charts are broken from what i understand look at numbers below (if thats true gtx295 dips to 2 fps )
    At least I wasn't imagining things...

  17. #142
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    WHen is this out retail?

  18. #143
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    950
    8th jan i think....

  19. #144
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Solus Corvus View Post
    Don't be foolish. That's how it always is. The 4870x2 was the fastest in only in certain games too, it was a big list though. There are always going to be exceptions to any architecture's reign.
    Truth.
    And Fallout 3, Cod:WaW, FarCry2, L4D, are all very heavily played by most gamers, especially fps enthusiasts. And dead space is relevant, and its always fun to see what cards score on Crysis, so I m not sure that the choices for the preview were that irrelevant.. these are all popular titles, vs things like call of juarez etc that were always i felt a little obscure.
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

  20. #145
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,035
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    Yes, lets.

    Their charts show the minimum framerates for both cards dipping below 10 on a number of occasions yet their results at the bottom of each chart show MUCH more than that.
    I noticed that in some other [H] reviews....from the top of my head i think i read somewhere that they use some kind of average-minimum numbers...

    Or maybe they do not compute saving points during the tests ?

  21. #146
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    Quote Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
    Truth.
    And Fallout 3, Cod:WaW, FarCry2, L4D, are all very heavily played by most gamers, especially fps enthusiasts. And dead space is relevant, and its always fun to see what cards score on Crysis, so I m not sure that the choices for the preview were that irrelevant.. these are all popular titles, vs things like call of juarez etc that were always i felt a little obscure.
    there are all fps games except fallout which is semi fps so all gamers are fps gamers

  22. #147
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiskeyAlpha View Post
    Not specifically referring to the cards in question but more in a general sense here: More important than the 100 - 105 margin you talk of is minimum and average framerates.

    There has been many comparisions between cards over the years where somebody will argue that due to a card having higher average or maximum framerates, it is automatically the better option. It's simply not the case and minimum framerates are really the crucial factor.

    If you could run crysis at say 100fps most of the time but hit dips of 10fps every now and then or alternatively have 30fps all the time, 30fps would be the better 'perceived' framerate, due to its stability.

    What I'm getting at here is more powerful cards do have a purpose that goes beyond trying to obtain uber-pointless 100+ framerates but rather they allow a high level of detail (including AF + AA) at a good res, with consistently stable minimal framerates
    I know average and lowest framerate with lots of AF and AA are where its at. A better comparison would be to look at these cards on a 22-24" monitor. At that point it really doesnt matter as they will both pretty much max out a 1920x1200 res LCD anyway. A very small portion of people are running a 30" monitor.

  23. #148
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    So how much are two gtx280s?

    Lets see how it compares to 4850x2 in crossfire. With the same drivers and few other games (grid?)
    Last edited by ahmad; 12-18-2008 at 03:08 PM.

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  24. #149
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    there are all fps games except fallout which is semi fps so all gamers are fps gamers
    Dead space isn't first person.

    Out of those games I am playing L4D, Dead Space, and FO3 regularly. Yes, it does annoy me that ATI can't deliver proper dead space performance. But after seeing the performance of the GTX295 I won't be losing any sleep over sticking with my x2.

    To me it looks like current x2 owners shouldn't bother with the GTX295. But those looking for a new card out of the current lineup should seriously consider a GTX295 over the x2. For me though, the economical choice would be a water block and soldering iron for vmods.

    No need to sugar coat anything, reality is sweet enough already.

  25. #150
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    115
    Quote Originally Posted by Tonucci View Post
    I noticed that in some other [H] reviews....from the top of my head i think i read somewhere that they use some kind of average-minimum numbers...

    Or maybe they do not compute saving points during the tests ?
    save points,there are simply too many of them in crysis games.

Page 6 of 19 FirstFirst ... 345678916 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •