ASUS Maximus II Formula - new P45 king?

[Zucker2k]

Wow you seriously have an attitude problem, think you're opinion is the be all and end all. Grow up please, you're making a massive fool of yourself, and ruining the thread. You are coming across like a diehard Asus RF fanboy, forcibly attempting to get people who differ with your opinion to justify their own opinions, or bow down to your "RF is the best" comments.

What I initially said were minor points, and said specifically in relation to the capabilities of the RF vs the M2F. It should have been left as that, as this is the M2F thread, not the "Zucker2K loves the RF and you must all agree with him" thread. If you want to debate the merits of various X48 platforms, make a thread and do it in the appropriate place, don't come into some unrelated board's thread and start arguing, or 'debating' as you euphemistically put it, with M2F owners about how great you think your board is, or how fantastic the 506 FSB max screen you achieved on it was. Aren't there enough people in the RF thread you can try and impress?

It's plainly obvious you got offended at the fact I commented your overclock Grnfinger linked to was not overly impressive, deal with it, it isn't that impressive. Also not a lot of C0/C1 9550's will go that high on FSB, and also there is one or two guys in the M2F thread with a 9550. There is another guy with a Q6600, one guy with a 9650 and one guy with a 9770 - none of these people have tested and posted results of max FSB testing or max FSB SS's. Why don't you educate yourself before attempting to undermine what I said about people with quads and the M2F - not many users have quads capable of 500 FSB, and those that own those quads have not done specific max FSB testing on this board and posted their results.

In addition, I did not 'thrash' the RF, I could certainly be a lot more critical if I felt the need to be, but I was restrained and only made necessary comments to support my opinion, as I don't own it, and didn't want to be overly critical. I used descriptions like "it appears to" and "it seems to" to demonstrate that what I was stating were observations, not direct findings of my own. I didn't go on some unwarranted and unwanted tirade about a board, like you have. I don't really like the RF, I stated briefly why, and when asked I stated the board I prefer to the RF.

Based on your statements, you cannot form an opinion of a board at all until you have owned and overclocked it. What made you choose the RF then? Did you own it before you bought one? Obviously not, you looked at the available results from it and other boards, and made an educated decision to buy it and try it. So essentially you are criticizing me for doing exactly what you did, only I didn't come to the same conclusion you did. You are apparently blind to your hypocrisy.

I shouldn't have to 'defend my utterances', my utterances being my opinion, to you or anyone else, I could have easily if I felt the need to, posted links etc, but your arrogance and attitude make you an unsavory person with which to debate. I simply couldn't be bothered debating with someone like you. From what I have seen, I don't really like the RF - so what? From what I have seen I prefer the T2RSB Plus - so what? I initially found your RF fanboyism and arrogance amusing, but now I find it ridiculous.

Please take your attitude and and 'DDR2 X48 debate' to an appropriate place, which is certainly not in this thread.

I see why you've been able to accumulate over a thousand posts in 3 months; posting speculation huh? You haven't proved anything and your best defence is to resort to hostility. Let me tell you what is immature, because that is what you are:

1. Speculation; obviously this is your strong-point otherwise this debate won't even be necessary. I moved from X38 to X48 seamlessly; same bios, everything, so no, I didn't have to "form an opinion" or make an "educated decision." See? Speculator? I went with Intel X** because of the superiority of the chipset.

2. Making Sweeping statements; I can't even elaborate on this one, it's all over your posts.

3. Clueless; you don't even know what you're saying anymore. This is not about you liking the rampage formula; boy, this is about you saying something you really don't know ANYTHING about. Wow! Do I have to point that out to you? Jeez, it feels like I'm having a debate with myself. You said something and I called you on it, capisce?

4. Indefensible statements; obviously that is why we're still having this debate

5. Spinning Myths/Lies; now this is dangerous, you want to give the air of somebody who knows what their talking about, but all you do is perpetrate myths. You've been exposed, boy.

So you tell me who needs growing-up? Dude can't even overclock his dualie and he's trying to pick a fight. Fact is the board you thrash has more potential than your fake skills could ever squeeze from it. Go learn how to overclock and then we can have a REAL DEBATE.

Sorry folks, but this fake wannabe overclocker had to be put in his place. Contrary to what some might think, I didn't take anything he said about my overclock personal. If you doubt me read my initial post. It was his reply to that post that started all this. I guess you can tell a person is cornered when they come out swinging. Man, you're hilarious. Remember, it's not personal I honestly thought you had a clue about what you were talking about. My apologies. I'm out.

PS: Hit me on the pm if you have anything else to say to me.