Wow you seriously have an attitude problem, think you're opinion is the be all and end all. Grow up please, you're making a massive fool of yourself, and ruining the thread. You are coming across like a diehard Asus RF fanboy, forcibly attempting to get people who differ with your opinion to justify their own opinions, or bow down to your "RF is the best" comments.
What I initially said were minor points, and said specifically in relation to the capabilities of the RF vs the M2F. It should have been left as that, as this is the M2F thread, not the "Zucker2K loves the RF and you must all agree with him" thread. If you want to debate the merits of various X48 platforms, make a thread and do it in the appropriate place, don't come into some unrelated board's thread and start arguing, or 'debating' as you euphemistically put it, with M2F owners about how great you think your board is, or how fantastic the 506 FSB max screen you achieved on it was. Aren't there enough people in the RF thread you can try and impress?
It's plainly obvious you got offended at the fact I commented your overclock Grnfinger linked to was not overly impressive, deal with it, it isn't that impressive. Also not a lot of C0/C1 9550's will go that high on FSB, and also there is one or two guys in the M2F thread with a 9550. There is another guy with a Q6600, one guy with a 9650 and one guy with a 9770 - none of these people have tested and posted results of max FSB testing or max FSB SS's. Why don't you educate yourself before attempting to undermine what I said about people with quads and the M2F - not many users have quads capable of 500 FSB, and those that own those quads have not done specific max FSB testing on this board and posted their results.
In addition, I did not 'thrash' the RF, I could certainly be a lot more critical if I felt the need to be, but I was restrained and only made necessary comments to support my opinion, as I don't own it, and didn't want to be overly critical. I used descriptions like "it appears to" and "it seems to" to demonstrate that what I was stating were observations, not direct findings of my own. I didn't go on some unwarranted and unwanted tirade about a board, like you have. I don't really like the RF, I stated briefly why, and when asked I stated the board I prefer to the RF.
Based on your statements, you cannot form an opinion of a board at all until you have owned and overclocked it. What made you choose the RF then? Did you own it before you bought one? Obviously not, you looked at the available results from it and other boards, and made an educated decision to buy it and try it. So essentially you are criticizing me for doing exactly what you did, only I didn't come to the same conclusion you did. You are apparently blind to your hypocrisy.
I shouldn't have to 'defend my utterances', my utterances being my opinion, to you or anyone else, I could have easily if I felt the need to, posted links etc, but your arrogance and attitude make you an unsavory person with which to debate. I simply couldn't be bothered debating with someone like you. From what I have seen, I don't really like the RF - so what? From what I have seen I prefer the T2RSB Plus - so what? I initially found your RF fanboyism and arrogance amusing, but now I find it ridiculous.
Please take your attitude and and 'DDR2 X48 debate' to an appropriate place, which is certainly not in this thread.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks