My bad.
Maybe we're not looking at the same graph so here is what I'm looking at:
The lower clocked C2Q Q9550 is actually head to head with PII 940 and beats it by a wider margin, Imagine would Q9650 would do at 3Ghz, just like PII 940. Now I'm not a mathematician so you do the math.STALKER CLEAR SKY, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 41.7
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 41.2
CRYSIS WARHEAD, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 35.7
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 35.0
DEAD SPACE, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 219.0
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 214.4
FAR CRY 2, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 54.4
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 46.2
WORLD AT WAR, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 48.7
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 57.3
WORLD IN CONFLICT, 1680x1050
Phenom II x4 940 3Ghz = 92.7
C2Q Q9550 2.83Ghz = 95.0
Now expect the C2Q line to drop in price around January; I expect the Q9550, the PII 940's main competitor (imho) to drop to around $250, I expect Intel to do nasty things, price-wise with this particular chip against the PII 940. Expect Ci7 920 to be hover just below the Q9550 in price. With the above performance from the Q9550, AMD will always be forced to price the PII 940closely to the Q9550 since the PII 940 offers no performance advantage over this chip; and it is z775 compatible.
I think talks of ATi 4000 series and Nvidia is a little bit premature here; Intel has too many good weapons to fight this battle.




.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks