Phenom II 6 GHz+ OVERCLOCK

[informal]

Anybody saw this ?

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=359342

http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...ea01696aad.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...fcf31169d9.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...6e1446313a.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...a4e1257410.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...b79b46edf1.jpg
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/imag...3bb1b138aa.jpg

Source seems to be expreview, but not longer available

Seems very plausible so they pulled it out.Thanks for posting these .

Not bad at all, but it doesn't help that the PII is the highest clocked chip and won 1 test. I'd like to see PII vs. Q9650 for clock to clock comparison test. I doubt AMD will be selling the PII x4 940 for lower than $250. That Q9550 will be a real spoiler for AMD, because it's a drop-in chip for s775.

Actually it won FC2 and Crysis warhead ,not 1.It came close second in Dead Space-6% behind and Clear Sky-1fps behind Turbo clocked i940(so that means per clock it was probably faster than i940).World at war and World in Conflict never favored Phenom(I) from the start(compiler?),but Phenom II makes up tremendous ground in these two games.
All in all,if true,in games at least ,Phenom II @ 3GHz is very competitive with both Core2Q and Core i7.We need some OCed benchmarks at say ~4Ghz for all 3 CPUs to see how they scale(in games GPU rules though).