No, go away. I'm not interested in shills and OC'ing with a part at the other end of the gaussian. Watching an intel employee come in here and astroturf is amusing, but the charade should end now, especially this appears to be a one sided contest with no AMD representative present.Originally Posted by Drwho?
I usually do not organize what I call "freak of nature" demo, what I mean by this is that I am always very careful to use statistically representative parts to avoid misleading anybody.
This time, I got a Saturday FedEx delivery ...
This is from my Buddies Milke M and Mike H (thanks for going the extra miles), this is a freak of statistic, this part is not in the middle distribution of the curve, it actually leak some serious current ... but it does OC, really, like hell.
6Ghz, i know i can do it already, let s see what is the next Digit, and to make sure everything is fair, I ll be joining a master of OC, he knows better than I do about LN2
I am just going to be doing the same as our green buddies, dissable the thermal control, and let s see
I ll drop the result here before thanks giving week end!
Yes, I bet that leaky (I'll throw a term that I'm not really sure about, but it's quoted) chip will probably OC to over 6 or mid 6 or 7 and we'll all be oh gasp intel is better ha ha that's obvious let's all go buy core i7 and pay for this guy's deluxe subway lunch.
Besides, all we have is your word that this is a bad chip, and as I read more and more of you I'm less inclined to believe it. You should also back up your claim with data showing how exactly this chip is bad.
Furthermore, your claim of 'freak of nature' demo (implying, I guess, AMD cherry picked its chips?) is backed up by no evidence. Nor is anyone's claims of just taking random chips. Your word is as worthless as anybody else's.
Anyways, my point is, go away.
But I'll acknowledge your attempt at diverting attention to be successful. But that's not something I didn't expect from you.
Bookmarks