I usually do not organize what I call "freak of nature" demo, what I mean by this is that I am always very careful to use statistically representative parts to avoid misleading anybody.
This time, I got a Saturday FedEx delivery ...
This is from my Buddies Milke M and Mike H (thanks for going the extra miles), this is a freak of statistic, this part is not in the middle distribution of the curve, it actually leak some serious current ... but it does OC, really, like hell.
6Ghz, i know i can do it already, let s see what is the next Digit , and to make sure everything is fair, I ll be joining a master of OC, he knows better than I do about LN2
I am just going to be doing the same as our green buddies, dissable the thermal control, and let s see
I ll drop the result here before thanks giving week end!
DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
Good, I'll be one of the many waiting for your post. But, please make sure you and Charles are not the only ones to back you up when you claim 6Ghz or even 7GHz. Our green buddies showed off in front of a crowd of press, all being witness of the overclock. I reckon a cpu-z validation or quick benchmark (try breaking the 32M world record if you're there) should do just fine.
Oh, everyone knows that this example is insignificant untill other people hit the same frequency, even less than AMD's results. From the moment other sources can confirm they're able to hit 5, 5.5 or even 6GHz with a Deneb processor, you proving a 'tweaked' or 'cherry picked' processor can hit crazy frequencies will mean nothing. All that matters is what the average retail processor can do, anything else is nice to see, but completely irrelevant.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
This is coming from the website, whose owner told me that overclocking is not only dangerous, but outdated, and prohibited. (i'll pull up the email if anyone wants to see)
I'm not saying it's not true, just that pcper is full of ttt, and should probably be grouped in the inq/fud category of "news" :/
As Los Alamos director J. Robert Oppenheimer watched the demonstration, he later said that a line from the Hindu scripture the Bhagavad Gita came to mind:
"I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."
Test director Kenneth Bainbridge in turn said to Oppenheimer, "Now we are all sons of b**ches." wiki
Uh Oh! Somebody has done lost it, and needs to be committed.
OC'ing is prohibited!
No, go away. I'm not interested in shills and OC'ing with a part at the other end of the gaussian. Watching an intel employee come in here and astroturf is amusing, but the charade should end now, especially this appears to be a one sided contest with no AMD representative present.
Yes, I bet that leaky (I'll throw a term that I'm not really sure about, but it's quoted) chip will probably OC to over 6 or mid 6 or 7 and we'll all be oh gasp intel is better ha ha that's obvious let's all go buy core i7 and pay for this guy's deluxe subway lunch.
Besides, all we have is your word that this is a bad chip, and as I read more and more of you I'm less inclined to believe it. You should also back up your claim with data showing how exactly this chip is bad.
Furthermore, your claim of 'freak of nature' demo (implying, I guess, AMD cherry picked its chips?) is backed up by no evidence. Nor is anyone's claims of just taking random chips. Your word is as worthless as anybody else's.
Anyways, my point is, go away.
But I'll acknowledge your attempt at diverting attention to be successful. But that's not something I didn't expect from you.
Last edited by cegras; 11-22-2008 at 10:21 AM.
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
The forum is open for any AMD representative to comment as well
I think it's not fair to ask him to 'go away' as it's his right to be here just as much as yours?
As to the rest, as I told DrWho? ; Vids or it did not happen
I'm aware you feel like he's playing the pr man here, but don't you realise it's AMD who has initialised the whole pr parade with their demonstration? And then limiting the amount of information the people present could disclose?
It's fair game. I already unsubscribed to the fanboy thread in the amd section, but if you want to only blow AMD's trumpet, I'd advice you to go there and join sounddood.
Every body take it easy ... The Demo is coming, and the Phenoms II will be in store soon ...
And for the demo, we will do on CAM, with and without tricks, I need the community to understand that Manufacturer demo is kind of not appropriate for OC, it is why i always let Charles and Co to do it.
So, we will know soon.
Don't forget Instruction per clock too ;-)
DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.
So did I marvin, that forum has ran alot of people off. I saw one guy ask a question in there and the very next post came out of the gate starting that fanboi crap, and the thread went downhil from there. Didn;t see the guy but maybe 2 or 3 posts later and never saw him again.
DrWho? is a highly respected member here. He is highly knowledgeable, and people could learn alot from his experience. It's awesome that we get to talk to some of the people that work with this stuff directly.
Favourite game: 3DMark
Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri
I'm very interested in a long vid about those tricks especially, and more then that I think most people already know that a demo controlled by a manufacturer is not as reliable as having acces to random retail chips but it would still be very informative to see how it's done. I'm going to ask FUGGER to put a trojan on his hdd though and steal Francois's application which he said he'll use to unlock multies Think people won't be buying anything other then 720's from then on
T_FLIGH maybe for some it's sports, but I was expecting better even if it is the AMD section. If Francois came in and said, beh Amd suxors and you just need to buy Intel.. without using any smilies intendening he was joking, well I can sence how that could be recieved as bad. But that is not what happend, and the fanboys just seem to want to be able to repeat to eachother how great this is and how glad they are, without going into any of the things which are playing a role in the background.
Before c2d, I had sempron and later athlon64 systems ( excluding a banias lappy ). Then I bought a e6300 because it was better for it's price then anything Amd could offer me. If AMD can change that, I will buy their hardware again, I'm not capable to pay the premium for the fastest available, I buy what gives the most bang for buck. So when they react to me like 'one of those intel boys', that's enough for me to dismiss any chanche of having a fruitfull and informative discussion with them. Instead, I let them blow their trompet and just sit back thinking about how much joy they seem to have living in their own small world
Bookmarks