MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 122

Thread: Deneb vs Agena..feel Free to "speculate"

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    LN2 might get you to 4.4-4.5, but don't expect more.

    3.8-4.0 will be the max sweet spot I reckon, but it would be an extremely nice speed for most of us already. And unlike the i7, it doesn't get up to 70+ degrees at that.
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    LN2 might get you to 4.4-4.5, but don't expect more.

    3.8-4.0 will be the max sweet spot I reckon, but it would be an extremely nice speed for most of us already. And unlike the i7, it doesn't get up to 70+ degrees at that.
    we've seen 4.3ghz on air. 4.4ghz-4.6ghz should be water I think 4.7ghz-5ghz will be LN2.

    DDR3 and IMC I hope they can give a refesh and use ganged unganed like 4x 64 bit 2 x128 bit dual channels and waud channel.

    deneb priced at $300 is fine for AMD.
    Last edited by demonkevy666; 11-10-2008 at 07:58 AM.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    15. Icore7 is looking Hotter then R600, phenom may have been hot but no that hot.

    16. at least where not in a TDP OC with phenom.
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    The biggest reason will be the fact it will overclock to q6600's 3.6 level's without tdp going crazy like on nehalem.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post


    Nehalem buyers will have remorse when they discover that even slight overclocks result in between 80C and 100C temps. We will see a huge migration of upset Intel customers to AMD Deneb.
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    And unlike the i7, it doesn't get up to 70+ degrees at that.
    Nehalem looks to be the best and easiest cpu to oc ever. Before you reply with the predictable "But anandtech found that if you oc the lowest binned part by 1.3ghz on the stock cooler it might overheat" Think what you will say if deneb runs hot when you oc the lowest binned one by 1.3ghz on a stock cooler.

    My prediction, Deneb will be a success, It will enjoy a 10-15% ipc improvement on average some things higher and some things lower and will have very good power usage below 3ghz, Over 3ghz it will be a lot worse due to current leakage with no highk metal gates.
    It has a good chance of taking the performance per $ crown and the performance per watt below 3ghz crown.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,119
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Nehalem looks to be the best and easiest cpu to oc ever. Before you reply with the predictable "But anandtech found that if you oc the lowest binned part by 1.3ghz on the stock cooler it might overheat" Think what you will say if deneb runs hot when you oc the lowest binned one by 1.3ghz on a stock cooler.

    My prediction, Deneb will be a success, It will enjoy a 10-15% ipc improvement on average some things higher and some things lower and will have very good power usage below 3ghz, Over 3ghz it will be a lot worse due to current leakage with no highk metal gates.
    It has a good chance of taking the performance per $ crown and the performance per watt below 3ghz crown.

    I agree it will be a lil hoter under higher clocks.. but I still feel it will not be as bad as Agena.. did the guys over at Coolaler ever mention temps on the OC they had on air? I believe it was a huge heatsink..but anyways.. untill Highk, the OCing attepmt will most likely still need the v's to get there..which will result in higher temps and more power draw of course. I still agree they will do a much better job at OCing tho. I am no engineer so correct me if I am off base
    ~1~
    AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
    GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
    Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
    AMD Radeon VII
    ~2~
    AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
    Asus Prime X399-A
    GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
    AMD RX 5700 XT

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by charged3800z24 View Post
    I agree it will be a lil hoter under higher clocks.. but I still feel it will not be as bad as Agena.. did the guys over at Coolaler ever mention temps on the OC they had on air? I believe it was a huge heatsink..but anyways.. untill Highk, the OCing attepmt will most likely still need the v's to get there..which will result in higher temps and more power draw of course. I still agree they will do a much better job at OCing tho. I am no engineer so correct me if I am off base
    Is 4.0Ghz at 53C on air while under 100% 4x load hot? It's a new day in AMD land!


    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ayia Napa, Cyprus
    Posts
    1,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post
    Is 4.0Ghz at 53C on air while under 100% 4x load hot? It's a new day in AMD land!


    woohay where did that come from
    Seasonic Prime TX-850 Platinum | MSI X570 MEG Unify | Ryzen 5 5800X 2048SUS, TechN AM4 1/2" ID
    32GB Viper Steel 4400, EK Monarch @3733/1866, 1.64v - 13-14-14-14-28-42-224-16-1T-56-0-0
    WD SN850 1TB | Zotac Twin Edge 3070 @2055/1905, Alphacool Eisblock
    2 x Aquacomputer D5 | Eisbecher Helix 250
    EK-CoolStream XE 360 | Thermochill PA120.3 | 6 x Arctic P12

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    47
    Will deneb work in AM2 motherboards? My prediction is that it will not.

    I don´t remember where i read it about this but the info was that AMD doesn´t recommend to give support for deneb in motherboards without separated power planes.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Nehalem looks to be the best and easiest cpu to oc ever. Before you reply with the predictable "But anandtech found that if you oc the lowest binned part by 1.3ghz on the stock cooler it might overheat" Think what you will say if deneb runs hot when you oc the lowest binned one by 1.3ghz on a stock cooler.

    My prediction, Deneb will be a success, It will enjoy a 10-15% ipc improvement on average some things higher and some things lower and will have very good power usage below 3ghz, Over 3ghz it will be a lot worse due to current leakage with no highk metal gates.
    It has a good chance of taking the performance per $ crown and the performance per watt below 3ghz crown.
    http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

    83C on a TRUE heat sink.

    the chips will operate at 80C but there life span will be shortened.

    some lower phenom have a higher max temp then higher clocked one like 9550 72C vs 9850 66C

    higher bins need less volts there i probably another reason why. but if it's above 70C for most chips that's hot.

    Deneb 45nm lithography uses water immersion form IBM if you look at the PDF posted in the thread you will see it's has more precise etching now.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Jazzman View Post
    Is 4.0Ghz at 53C on air while under 100% 4x load hot? It's a new day in AMD land!


    Something is not right with this, There is no way that 1.475v on a non highk process will max out at 53c on air, It just is not possible.

    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==

    83C on a TRUE heat sink.

    the chips will operate at 80C but there life span will be shortened.

    some lower phenom have a higher max temp then higher clocked one like 9550 72C vs 9850 66C

    higher bins need less volts there i probably another reason why. but if it's above 70C for most chips that's hot.

    Deneb 45nm lithography uses water immersion form IBM if you look at the PDF posted in the thread you will see it's has more precise etching now.
    What temp do you expect deneb to run at with a 1.2ghz oc? Also, I believe water immersion will not help with leakage with high volts on a non highk 45nm process.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast TheBlueChanell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Something is not right with this, There is no way that 1.475v on a non highk process will max out at 53c on air, It just is not possible.



    What temp do you expect deneb to run at with a 1.2ghz oc? Also, I believe water immersion will not help with leakage with high volts on a non highk 45nm process.
    i haven't screwed around with it but maybe it's an AOD glitch? CPU-Z Says 1.68v. Which would be amazing if true
    Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
    HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
    HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
    HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattskees View Post
    CPU-Z Says 1.68v.
    Cpu-z says 1.168v
    NineInchNails Addicted
    DFI || AMD || Micron

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast TheBlueChanell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by hary View Post
    Cpu-z says 1.168v
    ~ typo on my part.

    1.68 would be nuts haha. L2 or Water, and maybe not even water.
    Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
    HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
    HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
    HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattskees View Post
    i haven't screwed around with it but maybe it's an AOD glitch? CPU-Z Says 1.68v. Which would be amazing if true
    AOD is accurate. The CPU-Z version is an old one that did not read phenom voltage correctly. (Note the Windows Aero feature clearly shows that both photos are part of the same cutout.)
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    153
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Something is not right with this, There is no way that 1.475v on a non highk process will max out at 53c on air, It just is not possible.
    Well, I think it is within the realm of possibility. Informal was kind enough to post some comments that help illuminate AMD's recent effort.

    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Oh man you just made my day ,that was soo funny
    AMDzone is in for a ride .

    Anyhow i searched the spec.org for any newer additions on the SH Opterons and had no luck .Maybe the other results will come on the night of the official launch(next Wednesday).
    ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC.
    AMD seeks redemption - and sales - with Shanghai
    Chipmaker used lessons of Barcelona in revamping design process

    By Kirk Ladendorf
    AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
    Monday, November 10, 2008

    To the outside world, Advanced Micro Devices Inc. calls its latest chip Shanghai. To the engineering team, the usual name for the project is Ridgeback. But the real name for this chip could be "Redemption."

    AMD wants to restore some of the luster to its image that was lost when its last flagship chip, Barcelona, was months late and plagued by embarrassing bugs.

    The chipmaker was counting on Barcelona to revive its sagging fortunes in its perennial battle with Intel Corp., the kingpin of the microprocessor market.

    But Barcelona's public problems had the opposite effect. They cost AMD heavily in lost revenue, lost profits, lost morale and lost confidence from its customers.

    Now comes Shanghai and the hope for a recovery of reputation and, maybe, sales.

    The new chip began shipping to computer makers in October and will become the brain of new servers that show up this month. The formal unveiling is Thursday.

    Shanghai is similar to Barcelona, but there have been dozens of enhancements, including the addition of larger on-board memory caches to spur performance.

    AMD says the chip will quickly become the standard setter for Windows-compatible server chips, although Intel will counter with its own high-performance chips in the weeks ahead.

    "I am delighted with the chip," said Jeff VerHeul , AMD's vice president of silicon design. He cited the reasons: "A, it is early; B, it has greater-than-expected performance; and, most importantly, our customers like it."

    He backs the assertion of CEO Dirk Meyer , who called the new chip "the best server product on the market."

    The company has yet to deliver precise performance metrics, but VerHeul said Shanghai will deliver roughly 20 percent more performance than Barcelona while running at the same speed. Plus, it will run faster.

    The new chip, like Barcelona, contains four processing engines, or cores, but it is far more complex because it is made with a more advanced manufacturing process.

    Analysts are not quite as enthusiastic as AMD.

    "They need to rebuild their reputation and re-establish credibility," said Nathan Brookwood with Insight 64. "They need to demonstrate that they are executing and delivering on their promises. This should help there."

    AMD is aiming for a financial rebound as well after two years of losses. The chipmaker has sold some nonproductive operations and announced plans to spin off its German factory operations into a joint venture it will own with a sovereign investment company based in Abu Dhabi.

    In addition, the company announced last week that it had cut 500 jobs worldwide, including 154 in Austin, as part of an effort to cut operating costs as it aims for consistent profitability.

    The problems with Barcelona forced AMD's leadership to take an intense look at its design process and fix the flaws it found. Part of that fix involved a new procedure for designing complex, high-performance chips.

    In the past, the company relied mainly on one of its two major design centers in Austin or Sunnyvale, Calif. But the work on the new chip would be split among at least five design centers around the world: Austin; Sunnyvale; Fort Collins, Colo.; Dresden, Germany; and Bangalore, India.

    The first four centers would all work on key sections of the chip, and the design center in Bangalore, created in 2005, would be responsible for putting the pieces together in a complete design.

    The project was directed by a veteran AMD engineering manager Raghuram Tupuri, who moved to India in 2005 to get the Bangalore design center started. He returned to Austin last year.

    The approach was the brainchild of VerHeul, who dubbed it Centers of Excellence. He had tried a similar approach at IBM Corp. on engineering projects involving the design of servers.

    Splitting up a major chip design among several design centers can result in faster completion of the design, but VerHeul and Tupuri both say the approach requires extensive communications and personal rapport among the key players in the various far-flung design centers.

    "We had people from the various sites spend time together so they got to know each other," VerHeul said. "Developing personal relationships is very, very key."

    Tupuri said the global design effort came together as one big team, with engineers eventually feeling comfortable enough to call one another on important questions before, during and well after normal work hours.

    "We are standing on the shoulders of the Barcelona team and getting the benefit of the lessons we learned from Barcelona," Tupuri said. The engineers "wanted to succeed and put Barcelona behind them. They looked at Ridgeback definitely as a redemption."

    The key objective of the team was to check and recheck the design to improve the odds that the first silicon prototypes of the new design would function well. Achieving that goal saved months in the development cycle.

    "We were all keen on getting the first silicon healthy," Tupuri said. "If the first silicon is healthy, then the glide-path (to product launch) is set. Even if we delayed the tape-out (formal completion of the design), we wanted to get the first silicon right."

    If Shanghai is as good as advertised, then it should help boost AMD's sales of high-performance chips in the months ahead.

    But analyst Ashok Kumar with Collins Stewart LLC says the impact of the new chip might be muted by the weakening world economy, which has put a big dent in sales of servers to major corporate buyers.

    "Demand has fallen off a cliff," Kumar said. Shanghai "will let AMD hold its own in the current environment, which is the best they can do."
    AMD knows the stakes are high. They have to defend the server market and improve their desktop performance.
    Last edited by Jazzman; 11-10-2008 at 11:25 AM.
    Phenom 9950BE (125w) 3.2 ghz| ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe | 4 Gig Corsair XMS2 (DDR2 800 Mhz) | NV 8800 GTS 512 (G92) | SATA2: 2-SGTE 350; 2-WD 250 | SeaSonic M12 SS-700HM| Apogee GTZ; MCP355; Feser 240 | Creative X-Fi Xtremegamer | VISTA 32-bit |

  15. #15
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Something is not right with this, There is no way that 1.475v on a non highk process will max out at 53c on air, It just is not possible.



    What temp do you expect deneb to run at with a 1.2ghz oc? Also, I believe water immersion will not help with leakage with high volts on a non highk 45nm process.
    Then again, it might I want this chip out already so we can stop wondering and speculating, it is making me
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •