MMM
Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 238

Thread: Deneb Samples are almost out

  1. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    thats not the real latency of the 3rd lvl cache, its hidden by the prefetchers, its somewhere ~30-40ns same goes for nehalem.
    since you mention prefetchers, any word of improved prefetchers for K10.5?

  2. #27
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    AMD did mention IPC improvements many times(not the numbers of course,but they did mention it).So i guess prefetch could be on the improvements list.

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    L3 cache went form 32 way to 48 way.
    thats cause size increases, it was the same way from kents to yorkfield. Or just look at the cache castrated C2D -> E5200 is only 8 way.


    Quote Originally Posted by Bellisimo View Post
    since you mention prefetchers, any word of improved prefetchers for K10.5?
    I dont know, theres no word form amd, need to wait for the official announcement.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    http://www.bmighty.com/blog/main/arc...tting_out.html

    die shrink + removed resistor on parts of the Cache. lower heat lower load.

    4Mb (Barcelona/Agena)vs 8Mb (Shanghai/Deneb) on average core 2 duo was a 10% increase with 2mb vs 4mb.

    now shanghai/deneb brings 15% more IPC the Agena.

    HT3.1 really helps the L3 cache which needs to be closer to core speeds.
    Thats exactally my point, even if Deneb is the same IPC as Yorkies if they can clock higher than a similarly priced Nelhalem it will be a winner in my book

    If I had to guess I would expect close to or over 4ghz which will pose a very serious threat to i7 especially if the whole package is a good $300 less than the intel equivalent
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by OBR View Post
    in dreams ...
    well they for sure were able to launch it sooner if they wouldn't prefer to kick harpertown but first for sure harpertown will still provide the highest clock on quad, but that's not the real volume.

    Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
    It's said by AMD , do bother to read more closely the article.And it talks seemingly about 2S.I wouldn't be surprised to see higher clocked Shanghais beating Harpertown in enough tasks at 2S.

    However , Nehalem 2S is an altogether different pie.
    perhaps, will be depending on the use of HT or not, i am sure we will ship a few thousand of those with HT disabled. but just sell them because of the cool intel brand name

    but nehalem 2s volume launch is only arch-April, so that's still a long time to go.
    Last edited by duploxxx; 11-04-2008 at 11:30 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Seems kinda stupid to have chips 20% faster per clock and just have them at 2.8 and 3Ghz with the amount of sales Intel is doing. I love AMD but they should have just ramped them up to 3.5 and 4Ghz to stay competitive.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    West hartford, CT
    Posts
    2,804
    looks like AMD is pulling an Nvidia with there numbering scheme

    im sure people will be confused....a 9950 seems like it would be better than 20550?

    wtf seriously AMD what were u thinking!
    FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
    Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
    G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
    MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
    OCZ ZX 850w psu
    Lian-Li Lancool K62
    Samsung 830 128g
    2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
    Win7 Home 64bit
    My Rig

  8. #33
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by Glow9 View Post
    Seems kinda stupid to have chips 20% faster per clock and just have them at 2.8 and 3Ghz with the amount of sales Intel is doing. I love AMD but they should have just ramped them up to 3.5 and 4Ghz to stay competitive.
    Average computer uses <2.5Ghz processor...and that's 95% of the market

  9. #34
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Average computer uses <2.5Ghz processor...and that's 95% of the market
    Average computers use what the buyer's money can buy. You can't use frequency as reference.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  10. #35
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Check the prices for 2.8 C2D and A64 systems and think if it's priced for average user

  11. #36
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Check the prices for 2.8 C2D and A64 systems and think if it's priced for average user
    84$ for 2.5ghz

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819116072

    And I would say something funny about old P4s..but that might be hijacking
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  12. #37
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    I said systems

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    As far as I'm concerned, if deneb can roughly match penryn it's a success.

    I don't see much hope of deneb competing with i7 in raw power. It's just not going to happen imo.

    If they can get yorkie type CPU's out at a good price that OC well... Then at least I would find that somewhat appealing.

    In any case, be interesting to see how all of this plays out. It seems that we're finally getting somewhat close to deneb/shanghai.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Sly Fox View Post
    As far as I'm concerned, if deneb can roughly match penryn it's a success.

    I don't see much hope of deneb competing with i7 in raw power. It's just not going to happen imo.

    If they can get yorkie type CPU's out at a good price that OC well... Then at least I would find that somewhat appealing.

    In any case, be interesting to see how all of this plays out. It seems that we're finally getting somewhat close to deneb/shanghai.
    Agreed. Most people aren't going to run out and grab a $400 board, DDR3, and a $400 chip like the new Intel rigs. Especially when a lot of mid to high end users already have Quality DDR2 they can just pop in a new rig. Or even if you have a SB750 mobo + ram all you have to do is pop in a new deneb and bam! upgrade potential.

    To the one fellow yeah most users may only use 2.5Ghz whatever. Those same users prolly won't even upgrade anytime soon. Not to mention even if they did they'd prolly just opt for something along the lines and price range of a X2. I'm guessing you weren't around when the FX chips were out. They were daaamn expensive but people still bought them.

    AMD is making 65nm chips, efficient cheap chips, Great server chips, the 9600-9950 are good and as mainstream and high end as they have right now. Not super amazing compared to what Intel has. If you haven't noticed AMDs market share has shrunk, well having a niche in any market isnt a bad thing.
    If AMD introduced a 4Ghz 45nm Quad I don't see why that would be a bad move. Considering the same people who are buying 9950s are trying to push their chips as high as they can and can only hit around 3.6 at most. Well There you go, a 9950 that competes with and generally loses to a Q6600 or a Deneb that competes with a Q9450. I think I know as a consumer which is the logical choice. A Q6600 is a good chip but far from Intels high end 45nm chips so AMD is really lacking and needs something big. They are making awesome video cards and the people paying top dollar for them are more often than not running them on Intel rigs.
    So again 2.5Ghz is a nice number but AMD even said I think the difference is around 10-13% of Brisbane. So that is still a bit under Intel. You can't tell me there isn't a demand for high clocking AMD chips otherwise If there was only a need for 2.5Ghz or not People would still be picking up 5000 series chips instead of 9850s and such. Also if you haven't noticed Quad core sales have done pretty well in the past year too.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,294
    I for one have never liked Overclocking that much, yes yes I know, WTH?!

    But it's my personal preference, if AMD came out with a 3+Ghz product that performs aswell of better than my current e6850 I'll happily upgrade.

  16. #41
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Glow i was replying to yr original comment on 3.5GHz stuff. i guess you totaly missed the point. And dont worry I'm fully aware of the market cos i work in the industry

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    Glow i was replying to yr original comment on 3.5GHz stuff. i guess you totaly missed the point. And dont worry I'm fully aware of the market cos i work in the industry
    Then go steal us some Denebs all sneaky like
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellisimo View Post
    at least deneb will offer full control over the cpu, unlike nehalem where only the extreme part is usefull for overclocking and high mem speeds
    Whats this now? Is the i7 success hurting you enough to spread lies?

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    324
    What is a lie? The cake?

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Whats this now? Is the i7 success hurting you enough to spread lies?
    Sucess? Is it available?
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    If deneb benches come in and show similar results I will be more than happy about it and call that a success to. This place is for people that like fast hardware, is it not? So why are some getting so pissy that faster hardware has been launched? Does it not look like i7 is a success

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    244
    Surely can't wait

  23. #48
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    thats cause size increases, it was the same way from kents to yorkfield. Or just look at the cache castrated C2D -> E5200 is only 8 way.




    I dont know, theres no word form amd, need to wait for the official announcement.
    if that where true 90nm 1mb chips from AMD vs 512kbs 65nm chips would have been more then 5% faster.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Sucess? Is it available?
    Actually yes

    http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/...-out-wild.html

    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  25. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,052
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    I hope so.
    Look at what Charlie Demerjian has to say:

    http://www.realworldtech.com/forums/...94137&roomid=2
    I guess the AMD Information Minister will be dancing in the aisles again.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •