Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
I think OBR was speaking about samples being out(as in "leaky" hands of testers).

Back to INQ again,Charlie just wrote about the leaked Shanghai memo here.Take it with a grain of salt.It's still an interesting piece ,especially the bold part(no idea if it is a word from testers or how reliable it is).
It's said by AMD , do bother to read more closely the article.And it talks seemingly about 2S.I wouldn't be surprised to see higher clocked Shanghais beating Harpertown in enough tasks at 2S.

However , Nehalem 2S is an altogether different pie.