Quote Originally Posted by Gautam View Post
Hey guys, I am planning on making a video or even multiple videos of various 03 runs at various speeds.

My runs are reliable and I can get them any time.

I am planning on breaking 163k on tape this weekend at about 6320MHz, with the cards at 840/1080. If people want any other CPU speeds or GPU speeds for me to videotape, let me know and I will.

I will do complete runs, and I'm willing to do multiple runs back to back to show consistency too. My plan is to do 4 or so ~163k runs back to back. I'm confident I can do it.

As for the reason some people have much higher runs than others, I mostly believe it has to do with the build of Windows, though I don't understand why Tim's runs used to be high (142k at 4.8GHz is very good) and then suddenly got low (157k at 6.1 is not, I can get 157k probably at about 5.6-5.7)

I want to demonstrate what the refresh change does, but I think I'll do that in a seperate video, at 4.5GHz maybe.



The video cannot prove anything now. You know how many great overclockers got "bug low" and how many people results the same as yours?

85% bug low VS 15% real score. I didn't understand why these 85% need to trust 15% real run.

More and more great overclockers achieve bug low now. If only few bug low, you could say it's bug low. But over 80%+ bug low, how did you say it's bug? Or you say these overclockers are NOT good ocer? I saw some results gpu is higher than you and cpu is similar to you, but score is 10000 score difference. We know 03 depend on gpu clock much than cpu. If gpu clock 980 970 960 950 940 cannot be higher than your score, they could not make sense.