Quote Originally Posted by gosh View Post
Then he needs to show that he understands. It is easy to make someone believe that you understand if that person doesn’t know as much. You only need to be good at writing/talking. What JumpingJack is good at is writing and talking. But when he talks to someone that has some knowledge there need to be more than words.

Reading his first messages in this thread made me wonder if he was one unsecure child.
So, wait, let me grasp this.. JumpingJack has posted numerous links, done numerous time-taking tests on various systems, and he's the one 'only good at writing/talking'. While you have yet to prove anything yourself let alone refute his data - what does that make you then?