Actually,if you look at the title of this thread you might see that it was SPied(means it ran SPI1M).
No offence ,but why on earth would you like to know the SPI1M result(apart from comparing it to Agena's score to see if any improvement is there)??SPi is a poor "benchmark",it has always been,it will always bee.It is even poor in calculating pi,slow as hell.You have much better programs that calculate Pi in fractions of the second ,compared to lame SuperPi.
But to answer you question,Deneb @3.48Ghz scored 19.696s and that's a new WR for any AMD chip.Agena must work at around 3.97Ghz to score the same result,so Deneb is faster from 12-14% in this test(depends on NorthBridge speed).A 4Ghz deneb will be around 15% faster that the 1st result in this thread,so around ~16.9s.
And according to SPi numbers,if we use them as a general performance metric(ludicrous),it would imply that Yorkfield is faster than both deneb/agena by as much as 40-50% in general computing power which is beyond ludicrous(45nm C2Q is around 15% faster than Agena,on average).
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks