If you want the max AND it to stay quiet then don't overclock other than via Overdrive.Originally Posted by GAR
System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*
Guru3D readies X2 review for tomorrow.
Source - Guru3d
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
Build XT7 is currently active.
Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit
wow 4870s are @ as low as $254 on egg... some GTX 280 are selling as low as $420 .. wow
Asus 4870
POWER COLOR 4870
man i simply cant pull the trigger .. lol i am afraid the the moment i click buy the price is gonna drop
i hope X2 is gonna be @ low $500, or $500
Last edited by Philip_J_Fry; 07-20-2008 at 09:56 AM.
"Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys
Well they state Review in the article but Preview in the Article topic, So who knows.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
Build XT7 is currently active.
Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit
I was considering upgrading from my current card, but have since reconsidered. Even with the R700's impressive numbers, I just can't think of a game (that I would play) that requires this kind of horsepower.
What having super powerful graphics cards encourages is poorly optimised engines. When you have the kind of muscle of a GTX280 / 4870 / 4870X2 / 9800GX2, game developers aren't busy thinking "how can we make sure our games look as good, but run twice as fast" because the booming gpu market allows them to be lazy in this regard.
That is to say, we get wonderful looking games that often run far less well than they could. Especially a game like Crysis, for example, that seemingly does not cater to even medium spectrum computers at all.
And what do we need all this horsepower for? All this raw processing capability? A bigger is better philosophy with regard to the relationship between gaming and graphics is, as far as I'm concerned, is a cycle that only serves to trap itself, but enslaves us (the gamers, the consumers) in the process.
-
"Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320
E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
Intel's atom is a terrible chip.
Didn't they stop making 256MB cards in the late 90's?
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
.
.
For price 4850 CF is pretty good and dosent lose that much to RV700.
Now I have to wait for 4850X2![]()
Not really. In most of the tests it is equal, and there are just as many tests that it loses in by 1-3fps than it wins in. So I'd call them equal for the most part. There is a chance the performance delta may be negative (it may be on average slower), but we're talking about less than 3% delta here, for a card priced at $499, while two 4870s run you $599.
They still have to fix scaling issues in Crysis though X_X Beyond that, almost every other game gets pwned by the X2.
Perkam
in the last page of the review the person said:
On highlighted comments, is this reviewer talking out of his/her ass? pure speculation? 2x more heat?The Verdict
Alright then, time to wrap up this preview. As stated, there where some limitations enforced on this preview, mainly related to the number of benchmarks we can present. In our full review we'll obviously include the entire test-suite. But let me start by saying, all other benchmarks we took, were showing very similar performance. So for me it's simple, if this product launches at a 449-499 USD price level, AMD will have a unadulterated hit in the high-end segment.
Well, this was an interesting test for sure. The one thing each time I stumble into when I do something Crossfire/SLI/X2 related is ask myself the question: should you really be comparing a single GPU based product against a dual GPU based product? Is that even a fair thing to do ? The answer I'm afraid is two-fold. I strongly feel that I have more confidence in a single-GPU based graphics card mainly due to the fact you'll have much less worries to think about. See with Dual-GPU gaming you'll always run into slight irritations; the fact that sometimes a game is not yet supported or working at all in Crossfire. Also there's other stuff to consider, power consumption is doubled up but also .. your graphics solution will all of the sudden will create 2x more heat.
So that's a bit of a culprit there. Looking at it from the other side, if we take a GeForce GTX 280 (as presented in the preview) and compare that directly to bang for buck gaming performance, then the single-GPU solution is being annihilated. So this is a bit like comparing oranges and apples, both nice fruits .. yet very different. See, I tend to believe in the single-GPU based products, but just can't ignore what we tested today, the R700, is an extremely powerful graphics solution that will offer much better gaming performance.
What so hard to understand about a dual gpu producing twice as much heat? His point was once you go for a dual / multi gpu option, the heat produced doubles over a single gpu (eg 4870-4870x2 ) Its a legitment concern I'd say. Not everyone wants to / can deal with the heat these cards put out ( eg case too small, low airflow etc )
Feedanator 7.0
CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i
Well a lot of that depends on how well the stock cooler dissipates that heat to make temps manageable![]()
from guru3d preview
Once the R700 arrived I spent a complete day with it just to test and see how many problems we'd run into. Fact is, I had close to none.
A lot of games that where not shown in this preview due to an enforced limitation, ran all really well.
I've had a lot of critique in the past on Crossfire, valid criticism as only the popular games editors mostly used had good Crossfire support. With the new 48x0 X2 cards we think the tide definitely has turned.
My experiences with the card have been really good, the performance is flabbergasting.
If priced right, this is the new king in the high-end arena of graphics cards. I'm impressed, really impressed. And that's a hard thing for a company to achieve.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...-x2-preview/14
seems like good news !
regards
Last edited by mascaras; 07-21-2008 at 08:09 AM.
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
Bookmarks