MMM

View Poll Results: Do you consider your intel 45nm CPU (wolfdale E8x00) to be Degraded

Voters
280. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, after supplying 1.300v - 1.349v to the vcore

    12 4.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.350v - 1.399v to the vcore

    14 5.00%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.400v - 1.449v to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.450v - 1.499v to the vcore

    23 8.21%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.500v - 1.599v to the vcore

    15 5.36%
  • Yes, after supplying 1.600v or more to the vcore

    26 9.29%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.300v - 1.349v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.350v - 1.399v 24/7

    49 17.50%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.400v - 1.449v 24/7

    33 11.79%
  • No, and I run my vcore at 1.450v or more 24/7

    33 11.79%
Results 1 to 25 of 403

Thread: E8400/8500 degradation myth possibly busted?

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    i thought degradation was supposed to take a long time?... ie electromigration or whatever it is..?

    how many have actually killed their chips with overvolts?


    Yep, It does seem very apparent. The second e8400 I bought I kept it @
    1.32v and It eventually needed more volts, so it's obvious voltage was not
    causing this. The good news here is once it completes burn-in it slips
    no further.
    this sounds familiar to me
    i've experienced something like this 'burn-in' (possibly) with the e4300 'L2' 65nm...i ran it for 3 days at 3.4GHz before it started to bsod @ very reasonable volts also..1.4vish
    back down to 3.1-3.2 now for the past year or so.
    Last edited by adamsleath; 05-28-2008 at 04:13 PM.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •