[Uni] nVidia 9800GTX overclking test (Air)

[CraptacularOne]

I have results in this thread
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=177459
with my G92 running at 800/2000/1030 and a yorkfield running at 4Ghz

You are using a 45nm 4Ghz quad core. The 9800GTX is getting 16k in 06 with a 45nm 4Ghz dual core

A quad core will add about 1k - 1.5k to the score in 06. If you take the 3797 that the dual core scored and substituted it for your 5.5k CPU score, your score is not even 11k. Compare that to the 16.4k that the 9800GTX scored and we have a significant step up from a 8800GTS 512MB

[safan80]

You are using a 45nm 4Ghz quad core. The 9800GTX is getting 16k in 06 with a 45nm 4Ghz dual core

click the link and you'll have your answer.

[WeStSiDePLaYa]

It is?

My 8800GTS does nearly identically, other than slightly slower ram.

Your GTS does 850 core, 2100 shaders? on stock voltage and cooling? Seems unlikely.

[CraptacularOne]

click the link and you'll have your answer.

I have my answer. You cannot compare the scores from a dual core to a quad core in 06. As I said if you substitute your 5.5k score for the 4k score that the dual core got, you score is not even in the same ballpark. 11k vs 16k. The 9800GTX looks like it has some teeth.

[ripken204]

with my quad and 8800GTS G92 i am almost at 16000.
if i put their 4k score for cpu then i am about 14500.
so there is a slight increase.
my GTS is at 800/1100/2000

[CraptacularOne]

with my quad and 8800GTS G92 i am almost at 16000.
if i put their 4k score for cpu then i am about 14500.
so there is a slight increase.
my GTS is at 800/1100/2000

If you add roughly 5.5k CPU score (which is roughly what a quad will score at 4Ghz) to the numbers that the 9800GTX got. The score is almost 18k.

[fornowagain]

with my quad and 8800GTS G92 i am almost at 16000.
if i put their 4k score for cpu then i am about 14500.
so there is a slight increase.
my GTS is at 800/1100/2000

8800GTS @ 850/1150MHz E6850 @ 4275mhz

And the wolfdale they're using is quicker than the E6850 clock for clock so evens out.



vs

[VictorWang]

ETM Price might be about 399$ ? i think

for guys who are arguing about performance.
i said it will be no difference if 8800gts 512m at the same clk.

if u like to see quadcore score at 4Ghz or 4.5Ghz or even more, i will update later.
with card at the same speed, 4.5G qx9650, 3dmark06 break 19k easily

[fornowagain]

Your GTS does 850 core, 2100 shaders? on stock voltage and cooling? Seems unlikely.

Not all that. Mine, stock cooling no mods.



P.S. Older drivers and P35 vs x38 so ignore the 3d score.

[NightRaven]

ETM Price might be about 399$ ? i think

for guys who are arguing about performance.
i said it will be no difference if 8800gts 512m at the same clk.

if u like to see quadcore score at 4Ghz or 4.5Ghz or even more, i will update later.
with card at the same speed, 4.5G qx9650, 3dmark06 break 19.5 easily

even at high cpu speeds... 8800gts and this is the same?

waiting for updates! thanks for this interesting read

[hardrail]

If you make the assumption that Nvidia is releasing this card thinking that the enthusiast community (who still own 88 GTX's/GT's/G92 GTS's) is going to spend $400 to get a couple hundred extra points in 3D06, or 1 or 2 FPS in Crysis, it just doesn't make sense... Who would actually do that?

[safan80]

if u like to see quadcore score at 4Ghz or 4.5Ghz or even more, i will update later.
with card at the same speed, 4.5G qx9650, 3dmark06 break 19.5 easily

yes please and thank you.

[BullGod]

If you make the assumption that Nvidia is releasing this card thinking that the enthusiast community (who still own 88 GTX's/GT's/G92 GTS's) is going to spend $400 to get a couple hundred extra points in 3D06, or 1 or 2 FPS in Crysis, it just doesn't make sense... Who would actually do that?

No one goddamit! And I was dreaming about finding a really cheap GTX when this will be available.I guess people will be holding unto their GTX's and Ultras untill DirectX 11 comes out...

[VictorWang]

yes please and thank you.

4.5G QX9650, same clk, 3Dmark06=19k
http://www.unihw.com/viewnews-124-page-2.html

[ripken204]

well since you have this card, do you feel like benhmarking games?
it seems that in 3dmark06 it scores like an OCed 8800GTS G92 does, but what about games

[BullGod]

well since you have this card, do you feel like benhmarking games?
it seems that in 3dmark06 it scores like an OCed 8800GTS G92 does, but what about games

Yeah. A DirectX 10 game would be perfect. And please bench Crysis with that CPU and the 9800GTX oc'ed, if it still doesn't run well, that game is hopeless.

[VictorWang]

lol, sorry i'm not a gamer, know nth about game and havent time to test game

[ripken204]

aww, so why do you have this card then, lol.
for the love of overclocking?

[Vapor]

Do you need to ask that question on XS?

[ripken204]

ya i guess i don't have. he must really love to OC then because there is no gain from it besides showing off, lol.

[golfjam]

If you make the assumption that Nvidia is releasing this card thinking that the enthusiast community (who still own 88 GTX's/GT's/G92 GTS's) is going to spend $400 to get a couple hundred extra points in 3D06, or 1 or 2 FPS in Crysis, it just doesn't make sense... Who would actually do that?

THat sums everything

[STEvil]

Your GTS does 850 core, 2100 shaders? on stock voltage and cooling? Seems unlikely.

With the stock heatsink and fan turned to 100% and default volts set to the same as the default volts of a 9800GTX, yes.

They're the same core.

[Sneil]

Wow 19k on air, Very impressive! Do you have sli scores comming soon? Care to sell me a couple of these?

[VictorWang]

have 3*98gtx at hand and a asus strikerII , so...might be tri-sli tests will coming soon, depends on my time

[Sneil]

Awesome sounds good! Imo 19k is quite alright(better then what i thought it was going to be anyway!) I'll be getting two just because i currently have no 8800s, but if i did i would certainly say not worth the upgrade. Unless it manages to pull some nice numbers in games which we have yet to see...