The card looks nice, but the specs don't. Hope too see a nice Rx7xx series from ATi with some nice tricks up its sleeve. That will make nV awake again, the 9xxx series is one big cashcow for them, and no new stuff for us.
Intel Q6600 G0 @ 3600MHz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme / Papst 4412F/2GL
Asus X38 Maximus Formula SE @ 1102
G.Skill BHZ 4096MB DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 @ 2.10V
Dual Jetway ATi HD 4850 512MB @ 750 / 1100MHz
Triple WD 320GB S-ATA II 16MB
Dual Dell UltraSharp 2007WFP
Antec TruePower Quattro 1kW
A simple thought: It's not a different core, but a different revision. It could still boasts the optimizations they made to the 9600GT since they had plenty of time to do so... I hope, or they're going to lose a lot of customers!
i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
WD Caviar Black 1TB
Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500
Last edited by hollo; 03-07-2008 at 12:12 PM.
ATI Tray tools got a framebuffer monitoring graph and Rivatuner got a Framebuffer reader plugin that tells you how much memory you use ...
i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
WD Caviar Black 1TB
Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500
I think this card will be a darkhorse... why the extra 6 pin PCI_E needed for slight bump in clocks on same 65nm G92 core used on 8800GTS that uses a mere one 6Pin PCI_E
Also PVM managment has been radicalized....
Leading to my point that this cards going to be a darkhourse... these first cards comming out will be at those clocks to ensure cards work for consumers... but really will clock to hell and back... have more then the potentional to...
Sorry for spellings but hey im dyslesic! but thats not the point is it![]()
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3600Mhz 24/7
GFX: eVGA 8800GTS SSC 512MB
RAM: 4GB Corsair Dominator PC2-8500
MB: DFI LP LT X48-T2R
HDD:150GB WD Raptor X
PSU: Thermaltake Toughpower 1000W
Screen: Dell 2407WFP
So. Extra 6-pin power connection, which is NOT getting enough attention.
A.) Increased overclocking headroom and stability.
B.) Needs extra power for the speculated small increase in specs from G92 GTS.
C.) Specs are notably, but not radically, different than speculated. PCB design, which differs noticeably from G92 GTS, might indicate this possiblity.
D.) 9800GTX is a true darkhorse and Nvidia is playing everyone like fools, much like the G80 8800GTX and 8800GTS speculation of the past. The noticeably different PCB, electronic components, and dual 6-pin power connection might indicate this possibilty.
I'm banking on A and C, but hoping for D. If D is true, however, and the MSRP of the 9800GX2 is $600, MSRP of the 9800GTX would likely be upwards of $750.
Last edited by YukonTrooper; 03-07-2008 at 01:06 PM.
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
.
.
Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
300Gb of MUSICA!!
Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/
Last edited by mascaras; 03-07-2008 at 02:00 PM.
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
That the ZOTAC one? looks like their other designs.
I'd prefer a more exposed PCB that was black, but that's just me.
XBOX Gamertag:Fujimitsu - I'm lonely, be my friend!
9800gtx vs 8800gts 512 both oc'ed.
let's see the fps.
9800gtx has to win that duel surely....but by how much?
Last edited by adamsleath; 03-07-2008 at 03:46 PM.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
Asus Maximus Formula (Rampage Conversion Bios 0403)
Q6600 G0 stepping@4.05 Ghz
8GB G. Skill 1066 @ 1081 Mhz
EVGA 280 GTX
Auzentech Prelude
2X 74 GB WD Raptors in Raid 0 Windows 7 Ultimate 64
2X 1 TB WD Caviar Blacks in Raid 0 Vista Ultimate x64
Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W
DTek Fuzion V2 in a custom CPU only water loop
Coolermaster Stacker 830
Hanns-G 28" widescreen
Klipsh Pro-Media 2.1
G15 Keyboard and G9 Laser Mouse
from a quick google search it seems that the improved compression algorithm on the 9600 is a feature of all g9x GPUs
Well, good news for 9800GTX I guess, better performance per clock... which is really good in this case!
i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
WD Caviar Black 1TB
Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500
well it means it'll probably be the same clock for clock as the 8800 GTS, which i thought of as bad news
10 fps in crysis seems like a big deal to me!
Cpu: Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.9 ghz (cooled w/ Apogee GTZ)
Mobo: Gigabyte EX58 UD5
Ram: G.SKill 3x1 GB DDR3 1600
GPU: GTX 280
PSU: E Power 1000 Watt
Isnt the 9800 supposed to scale very well in SLi???? These cards are going to sell for $399, so price is decent.
Is it just me, or are the SLI fingers on the 9GTX wider than those of past?
Bookmarks