Anyone with BIOS 1001 and 45nm CPU over 490 FSB? i've tryed 6 CPUs and non do 500 FSB (1 QX9650 and 5 E8400) i'm really stating to think about motherboard / BIOS for this issue
Anyone with BIOS 1001 and 45nm CPU over 490 FSB? i've tryed 6 CPUs and non do 500 FSB (1 QX9650 and 5 E8400) i'm really stating to think about motherboard / BIOS for this issue
hiya metro it seem 500fsb plus on the extreme is not as feasible as on p35 boards, i have also tried 3 all stop at around 4600mhz, 500fsb stable but over 511 ,like 512-513 fsb very flaky, the only thing i found that helped to bott at 500fsb was disabling transaction booster and setting the relax level to 3 or 4 , then once in windows using memset to lower the performance level again, i think the only way over it is a new bios revision, i have benched 05,03,aquamark at 4603 which was 512 fsb on the e8400 and 3d06 at 4575 mhz (509fsb)
Last edited by GLENBOY; 02-09-2008 at 03:56 AM.
500 fsb was no trouble on my board with E8400:
Max bootable was 550.
Max on qx9650 on this board for me has been 465.
2600K | Maximus IV Formula | 12G Corsair 1600 C8 | 2x 6950 | Coolermaster Scout
mike which bios you use and what mch volts, and what would it do benchmark wise at over 515fsb superpi,3dmark , aqua etc on the 9 x multiplier
Aivas nice to see you, whats the max fsb using the 9x multiplier , it seems that 500fsb stable but over 510 is flaky, i am really talking about the max multiplier, thanks
i have completed 3dmark06 at 508fsb (4575mhz) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5040734
3dmark05 at 514 (4626mhz) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3954398
and aquamark at 517fsb , but any thing over 500fsb it was flaky i have had 2 e8400s and 1 e8500 and they have all topped out at 4500-4600 irrespective of voltage but some of the p35 board owners have had like 4700-4900 mhz, its not a big difference but i'm wondering if the internal memory timings on the northbridge are a bit tighter on the x38 boards than the p35
Last edited by GLENBOY; 02-09-2008 at 12:21 PM.
That is what i use and got been getting good memory overclocks
Thanks Glen, i tested my E6850 that does FSB 555 on P5K3 Deluxe and the max i got on this board was around 517MHz benchable.
I use transaction booster at 2 or 3 will give it a try to disable it.
Depends on memory i've tested 3 good memory kits one like the white ones a lot other did better in the blue ones
Hello Mike,
Could you share your settings? on bios 905 i could do 475 with the QX9650 tryed almost everything i could read/think of to get 500FSB but was imposible.
Now on E8400 i'm really disapointed and starting to think that is a board issue or i'm overlooking something, i could use your wisdomwith FSB 530-540 for now im happy.
Regards
I will try to put up detailed settings later today, but I doubt that you overlooked anything. It's my second day on this board and I only ran 1001 so far. I am getting in another ME next week and I will be able to tell more about variances between individual ME boards.
From my memory NB voltage was about 1.76V, VFSB around 1.55V
Transaction booster was enabled and at 3, BUT Static read/write both DISABLED.
Vpll around 1.75V, but again this is all from memory. I'll get more detailed later today when I plug in the E8400.
QX9650 I tried very hard to get to 500FSB as well - no go ( no clue what the max FSB on my chip is on another board)
One thing is for sure X38 is def. not the right board for E8xxx FSB clocking 965 would do worlds better in terms of FSB
@Glenboy - I'll post some 9x multi benches later as well will have to spend some time with the family first
EDIT: One thing to do when switching between CPUs - make sure to clear bios / load default settings and start form scratch with bios settings
Last edited by mike; 02-09-2008 at 01:20 PM.
Quick question...
Has anyone here removed the stock cooling to replace thermal compound, if so, did you have any issues ?
If I remember correctly I had some issues trying to remove the stock cooling on a Formula SE as the heatpipe seemed like it was welded to the northbridge.
Thanks in advance
EDIT: Found my answer...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=168061
Last edited by JPxM0Dz; 02-11-2008 at 03:28 PM. Reason: EDIT
RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270
Yes here is what I did:
http://www.blazingpc.com/forum/showt...030/index.html
Dismantle and sanding starts on post 2...
Never empower an idiot with a response....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
Seller/Buyer Reputation:
Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=50905
Ebay: {Family Account} Kasyg3 http://myworld.ebay.com/kasyg3/
Ebay: {My personal Account} Sdumper http://myworld.ebay.com/sdumper/
iTrader: http://www.blazingpc.com/forum/itrader.php?u=28
Thanks, seems to me that Asus might be doing somethign wrong with BIOS on 45nm, i changed to my P5K3 Deluxe and could do easily FSB 530 if i disable transaction booster but this makes Super Pi times on 2M a good 2 seconds slower. If i leave it on i top around FSB 500 on P5K3 Deluxe, didnt try to disable Transaction Booster on X38 because clock for clock it sucks then.
Might just do that and test again.
Here's my settings for the E8400 on air ( please don't copy the Vcore) :
Extreme Tweaker
Ai Overclock Tuner : Manual
OC From CPU Level Up : AUTO
CPU Ratio Control : Manual
- Ratio CMOS Setting : 09.0
FSB Frequency : 535MHz
FSB Strap to North Bridge : 333
PCI-E Frequency: 110
DRAM Frequency: DDR3- ???
DRAM Command Rate : Auto
DRAM Timing Control: Manual
CAS# Latency : 7
RAS# to CAS# Delay : 6
RAS# Precharge : 5
RAS# ActivateTime : 48
RAS# to RAS# Delay : Auto
Row Refresh Cycle Time : Auto
Write Recovery Time : Auto
Read to Precharge Time : Auto
Read to Write Delay (S/D) : Auto
Write to Read Delay (S) : Auto
Write to Read Delay (D) : Auto
Read to Read Delay (S) : Auto
Read to Read Delay (D) : Auto
Write to Write Delay (S) : Auto
Write to Write Delay (D) : Auto
DRAM Static Read Control: Disable
DRAM Dynamic Write Control : Disable
Ai Clock Twister : Enabled
Transaction Booster : 3
CPU Voltage : 1.85
CPU PLL Voltage : 1.72
North Bridge Voltage : 1.87
DRAM Voltage : 2.0
FSB Termination Voltage : 1.68
South Bridge Voltage : 1.175
Loadline Calibration : Enabled
CPU GTL Reference : 0.63x
North Bridge GTL Reference : 0.67x
DDR3 Channel A REF Voltage : Ref
DDR3 Channel B REF Voltage : Ref
DDR3 Controller REF Voltage : Ref
SB 1.5V Voltage : 1.6
NB LED Selection : NB Volt
SB LED Selection : SB Volt
CPU LED Selection : CPU VOlt
Voltiminder LED : Disabled
CPU Spread Spectrum : Disabled
PCIE Spread Spectrum : Disabled
Advanced CPU Configuration
CPU Ratio Control : Manual
- Ratio CMOS Setting : 09.0
C1E Suppport : Disabled
CPU TM Function : Disabled
Vanderpool Technology : Disabled
Execute Disable Bit : Disabled
Max CPUID Value Limit : Disabled
Metro.cl- the key value for me to get the FSB going were both Nothbridge and Vfsb voltages. Obviously with the E8400 we're running into 2 walls - the CPUs and the Mobos FSB. I tried the E8400 on phase only managed to get up to about 555 FSB not sure if it was the CPU or the mobo - probaby both. Vpll had hardly any impact for me - 2V+ only did harm.
Last edited by mike; 02-11-2008 at 07:32 PM.
I am a chicken too when it comes to running 24/7, but for a quick bench here or there...
Actually I live in Vegas now - and it's a bit cooler..at least at the moment, but not much longer...
Vcore - yikes ,well my CPU is a dog - I had another E8400 before that did 4.75 with 1.65V and a max FSB of 575 on a Maximus Deluxe, but it was my first Wolfsdale and I thought it was not good enough ( hoping for 600+ ) and put it up on ebay - too bad now that I realized how good it really was.
This E8400 really scales only with massive Vcore - had it up to 1.9V (air) and still kept going up clockwise - obviously I only ran 1Ms and nothing to really stress it ...and it still runs happily
Another thing to look into is SouthBridge voltage - not sure if it truly has any impact, but might be worth checking out.
CPU GTL might help to lower the vlaue depending on your CPU, I had more luck with another CPU using the 0.53X setting
Last edited by mike; 02-12-2008 at 12:10 AM.
Bookmarks