http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/graph...1/1210234.html
if true, looks worth the money
too bod there isnt a comparison with regular crossfire card
http://www.pconline.com.cn/diy/graph...1/1210234.html
if true, looks worth the money
too bod there isnt a comparison with regular crossfire card
Last edited by GoThr3k; 01-22-2008 at 02:16 AM.
looks like we have a new king and this can game 3d render and play videos
teh pic is of 1280x1024 the 3870 x2 dose alot better with higher rez ull see when u got to the link
its not like having 2 gpus make it not count the gx2 counted
what will this do in crossfire i bet it will break 30k without trying
Last edited by zanzabar; 01-22-2008 at 02:19 AM.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Kinda dissapointed, it beats out the 8800Ultra on the older games, but not new games like Crysis where we need the performance boost. If it's $399 it would be a great deal, but at $449, I might as well get the 8800GTX and oc that.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 TeraFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
Build XT7 is currently active.
Current OS Systems: Windows 10 64bit
how can this be disapointed? its cheaper, performs better, and you can finally decode HD movies...Originally Posted by awdrifter
it looses by less than 1fps at a reasonable resolution in crysis so i dont see that as real loss as that engine being programed terribly and not liking multi gpu and not being able to use more than 128 shaders
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
its a issue with crossfire specific to crysis. future drivers should fix that though.
the card does run rather hot, 79C gpu temp means to me = aftermarket cooler needed. also powerconsumption is 25W higher than with a 8800Ultra.
O'rly it can't use more than 128 shaders hmm....
Since patch 1.1 one the game works well with CF too (or that is what I heard from CF users in this forum) but here is a review with the game performance 1.0 version and SLi so as you can see a 8800GT scores 27.3 FPS average in single and 45.2 in SLi and a 8800GTS 21.2 single and 38.8 in SLi I think that's quite a hefty boost...
So it CAN use more than 128SP,it's not terrbly programed and quite likes multi GPU (or atleast the Nvidia version...)
Last edited by XS2K; 01-22-2008 at 02:45 AM.
Before you complain about lag, think about Jesus. He lagged three days before respawning.
Seems to be a roughly 10-20% increase in performance across the board vs. the 8800 Ultra, depending on the game and the level of multi-GPU support.
Another review: http://www.fpslabs.com/reviews/video...3870-x2-review
20K single card 06 is about to be no big deal
Id better crack out the dice sharpish!
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
looks wrong, gpu clock should be higher and mem clock should be lower
and only 13k in 06??
strange
Yeah, looks like they had CF troubles w/ 3dM06 but there are apparently two 3870X2 configs coming out: the 775 MHz clocked ones and the 825Mhz clocked ones. Might be up to the AIB to set their own clock speeds.
u have to have a 3.6 ghz + cpu to get a good score theya re running a 2.8ghz quad so the scores are lower than the 1st review with a 3.6ghz
fps also killed the bandwidth and used a 680i board so the test is scued towards NV with the extra bandwidth for teh NV cards but only a degraded 16 pci-e1 lane for the ati card (a pci-e2.0 card), the 1st reviewer used a dq6 x48 witch is neutral witha full bandwidth pci-e2 slots
Last edited by zanzabar; 01-22-2008 at 03:24 AM.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
if R680 have it +/- the same performance like Ultra, is comparable to GTS-512because difference between Ultra and GTS-512 is small ... GTS-512 is cheaper then this R680 ...
You can choose : R680 - brutal heat, performance like Ultra (oced GTS-512), noisy cooler for 600USD! Or GTS-512 with oced the same performance, great cooler for 400USD ... what is better?
did you look at the numbers?
3870x2 > ultra > g92 gts
oced gts can only touch gtx not ultra anyway great results from gpu like r600 they made new king pretty impressive
Ultra is discontinued product on EOL! Today NVIDIA has only GTS-512 difference between Ultra and GTS-512 is very small
difference is few percent ...
... OK R680 in better then Ultra ... but 2x GT in SLI are better for the same price like R680 ...
At a msrp of $450us.It appears to be the card to own.OBR you need to put on spectacles.
At a msrp of $450us.It appears to be the card to own.OBR you need to put on spectacles
here in Europe costs 620 USD ... 420EUR ... maybe are spectacles better for you ...
Ultra isn't quite EOL yet - in fact, Nvidia still touts it as their performance king and toes the line that Ultra > GTX > GTS 512 > GT.Ultra is discontinued product on EOL! Today NVIDIA has only GTS-512 difference between Ultra and GTS-512 is very small
difference is few percent ...
... OK R680 in better then Ultra ... but 2x GT in SLI are better for the same price like R680 ...
As far as those prices go, EUR == USD prices with regards to video cards after you take taxes and all that account. Even w/ the US dollar falling, it's been fairly close to the trend. They're expecting the 3870X2 at $449 release so it'll be a great price, especially for people who don't have dual PCIE solutions.
Reality:
R680 kickass
Cheaper and way better then 8800 ultra.
Next...
Let come 8800GX2.
yeah, ultra is only like 10-20% faster then new gts with AA and 3870x2 is only like 10-20% faster then ultra.
Those 20-40% more is really not worth to mention
wow, you found a shop who sells it for 420€... so what ?
There is also one who already got it for 380€ and it's not even released !
System : E6600 @ 3150mhz, Gigabyte DS3, 4gb Infineon 667mhz, Amd-Ati X1900XT
I suppose they haven't read the " HD3870X2 = hardlaunch (available 24th January in Dutch shop for €399) ( 1 2 3 4 5) " thread...
Anyway. Card looks promising (from the OP's review).I want to see more (correctly done on x38) reviews though.
Last edited by Unbornchild; 01-22-2008 at 05:05 AM.
System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*
Kickass card? Its CF on a card. Could just buy 2 HD3870..they would even be cheaper. And the heat..ouch...
Its like adding 2 G92s on a card and call it kickass. It just aint. Living with all the CF/SLI bugs, specially with multi monitors is too horrible.
Now give me a single GPU card instead. And not another R600 heatmonster.
It needs to be same or cheaper than 2 HD3870 cards. Not more...
Last edited by Shintai; 01-22-2008 at 05:17 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks