still under nda, can't post anything more
3dmark06 default
under XHD 1600P 2560x1600
thought: AA lover please use RV670 XD
still under nda, can't post anything more
3dmark06 default
under XHD 1600P 2560x1600
thought: AA lover please use RV670 XD
Interesting, thanks for the heads up
No NDA for me
Very first run no time for anything else yet.
no nda for me either but it causes problem to whoever gave it to youOriginally Posted by T_M
No NDA for me
i still want to get more card later
I bought the card
is the gddr3 killing it at high res? The ATi cards aren't very good at AA as it is... What's going on there?
Ryan
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Abit IP35 Pro
Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 @ 3200 w/ Tuniq Tower
2x2gb A-Data DDR2 800
AMD/ATi HD 4870
whoever sell it has problem XDI bought the card
jk. if you buy it that is good to post anything. but for me i need to protect who gave it to me
yeah understood guess.
Nvidia won't come after anyone. They are not stubborn, they know that all these prereleased scores cause chatter which in turn will cause massive sales.
Here is your comparable gts vs my gt, though your cpu scores are higher.
I am running a x3210 at 3520mhz and your q9650 is running at 3640mhz.
I then clocked my gt at exactly the same specs 650-972-1625
Below is the result details of your submitted project.
Main Test Results
8800GT 3DMark Score 14138 3DMarks
8800GTS 3DMark Score 14743 3DMarks
8800GT SM 2.0 Score 5815 Marks
8800GTS SM 2.0 Score 6013 Marks
8800GT SM 3.0 Score 5551 Marks
8800GTS SM 3.0 Score 5741 Marks
8800GT Cpu Score 5503 Marks
8800GTS Cpu Score 6015 Marks
8800Gt Scores
8800Gts Scores
Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 47.637 FPS (gt)
1 - Return to Proxycon 49.491 FPS (gts)
2 - Firefly Forest 49.286 FPS (gt)
2 - Firefly Forest 50.73 FPS (gts)
CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.824 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU1 - Red Valley 1.995 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.657 FPS (x3210 3520mhz)
CPU2 - Red Valley 2.901 FPS (qx9650 3640mhz)
HDR Tests
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 52.856 FPS (gt)
1 - Canyon Flight (SM 3.0) 55.368 FPS (gts)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 58.16 FPS (gt)
2 - Deep Freeze (SM 3.0) 59.44 FPS (gts)
Last edited by Eddie3dfx; 12-08-2007 at 01:25 PM.
Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators
can we have some tests at normal speed cpus please?
Normal?
Like the 3.6GHz in my post above?
yes versus the 4.4 ghz in the first post. cant we just have a stock test for once?
TM anyway you can lower your cpu clock and get closer to the 5500 06-3dmark cpu score so we can compare?
I think the qx is 5% faster at same core (3520mhz - 5% = 3344mhz)
Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators
Sorry, I had a great laugh out of this. These two things are completely at odds with one another.
Intersting results though....
denny i want one HD3970 , its a new card???
serious: nice tests
Last edited by mascaras; 12-08-2007 at 01:42 PM.
[Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
[Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! « .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
[Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
[Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «
Me wants!denny i want one HD3970 , its a new card???
serious: nice tests
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
Too bad 3dmark06 scores do not reflect the actual performance of these cards at all anymore...
QFMT
i7 920 | Asus Rampage II gene | 6GB ocz Blade | 4870x2
I guess i am not that up-to-date on the acronyms...
Not sure if i need to back up my claim or nod in agreement.
Well QFT is "quoted for truth" so use your imagination as to what the M stands for...my sense is he is strongly agreeing to say the least...
(and your statement was correct so...)
Dark Star IV i5 3570K | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 | 8GB Samsung 30nm | GTX 670 FTW 4GB + XSPC Razer 680 | 128GB Samsung 830 Apogee HD White | 140MM UT60/120MM UT45/120MM ST30 | XSPC D5 V2
Thanks for the info.
I still don't get itWell QFT is "quoted for truth" so use your imagination as to what the M stands for...my sense is he is strongly agreeing to say the least...
(and your statement was correct so...)
HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"
Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now
and i always thought QFT meant "quite f*cking true",lol.
so QFMT is adding the word "majorly".
Last edited by pumbertot; 12-08-2007 at 10:15 PM.
Now for some real testing
Looks like it needs high resolutions to start pulling much from the GT.
HTPC - AMD Phenom II 555 Unlocked(4cores) - 4GB Gskill - AMD HD 5850 - Avermedia Duet - Harman Kardon avr247 - Surround Sound (Infinity Beta 50's, 10's, 360, and ed a2-300) - Samsung 46"
Desktop Powerhouse PC - Gathering dust due to high usage of HTPC as general pc now
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks