MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 782

Thread: ATI HD 3800 Review Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Lightman View Post
    Me too!

    When I tested HD2900 CF setup set @777/980 +my X2 6000+@3500Mhz 1.5V power draw from socket was reaching 720W during 3DMark06 run!!
    Now with this pair of HD3870 set @877/1311 all the rest identical I can't even push over 450W!!

    That is huge improvement under load, but idle is amazing too! It's better (lower) with two cards than what it was with ONE HD2900Pro(XT) !
    Hehe I´m also monitoring power consumption with my Gigabyte Odin (yes I know, weird system, and inaccurate) but my system with the 2900XT idles at 150W, with an X800 at 100W, and with 3870 100W too! Impressive. And loaded, 2900XT 330W, 3870 only 235W!! More impressive. In a few days I will test 3870 CF.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Am I in the right place, sounds like I would be lost in XtremePowerSavingSystems.com?
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Am I in the right place, sounds like I would be lost in XtremePowerSavingSystems.com?
    There are many ways to be extreme dude

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Am I in the right place, sounds like I would be lost in XtremePowerSavingSystems.com?
    Then why were soooo many people ing about the R600 power draw here?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    606
    Soooo, basically, in performance wise

    8800GT > 3870 > 3850 > 8800Ultra > 8800GTX > 2900XT > 8800GTS

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    516
    Quote Originally Posted by topaimz View Post
    Soooo, basically, in performance wise

    8800GT > 3870 > 3850 > 8800Ultra > 8800GTX > 2900XT > 8800GTS
    No.

    8800Ultra>8800GTX>8800GT>3870>2900XT>8800GTS>3850

    in single card set ups. Xfire gives more benefit than SLI atm, however, and shifts that list more towards ATI's benefit in multi GPU set ups.

  7. #7
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Periander6 View Post
    No.

    8800Ultra>8800GTX>8800GT>3870>2900XT>8800GTS>3850

    in single card set ups. Xfire gives more benefit than SLI atm, however, and shifts that list more towards ATI's benefit in multi GPU set ups.
    I'll agree with that for the most part, except for your last comment.

    See this article:
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3151&p=10

    Scaling looks pretty good from the Radeon HD 3850, however it's still not as good as what NVIDIA is able to achieve with the 8800 GT. NVIDIA consistently achieves about 11% better scaling from one to two GPUs than AMD.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    516
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner View Post
    I'll agree with that for the most part, except for your last comment.

    See this article:
    http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3151&p=10
    I could be wrong. I was relying on the following:

    http://www.expreview.com/review/2007...2778d7055.html

    which is more extensive than the Anand testing and seems to show the CFed 3870s more competitive against the SLI GTs than the single card comparison. Drivers and i780 could certainly change that though.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,402
    Quote Originally Posted by Periander6 View Post
    No.

    8800Ultra>8800GTX>8800GT>3870>2900XT>8800GTS>3850

    in single card set ups. Xfire gives more benefit than SLI atm, however, and shifts that list more towards ATI's benefit in multi GPU set ups.
    AA8x is faster on 3870. =>

    AA8xAF16x

    3870>8800GT

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    The Anand comparison is worthless, with Catalyst 7.10.
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •