Results 1 to 25 of 127

Thread: Crysis Demo Performance Analysis

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    817
    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    It ran fine with decent settings on my 9700 pro
    I was exagerating (sp?) to make a point... The same people who complain about Crysis not running fine at highest settings on current hardware, are probably in the same boat as the people who complained about Far Cry not running fine 3 years ago...
    I play Crysis at everything high, except shaders, shadows and textures at medium, 4xaa and 8xAF, 1680x1050, and it runs and looks great... That's what I call very decent settings on a 1 year old GFX-card design, but some people apparently think that anything below the highest possible, is unacceptable from a completely new game.
    Also, I doubt anybody was actually using that high a res back in the day, even on their "high-settings" setups..

    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    FarCry, Unreal 3 demo, Call of Duty 4 demo, Half-life 2, all have better image quality/performance ratios than Crysis
    I wasn't talking about image quality/performance, but pure image-quality compared to what people expect of their hardware... And when Far Cry came out, it sure as hell didn't have better quality/performance ratios than Crysis does now... Unreal 3 is "old" news by now, it's had over a year to mature and get optimized through its lifetime... CryEninge 2.0 hasn't been used in other games, and once again, I put forward my claim that Crysis' graphics are more intense on the level called "realism"... UT3 looks very bland in my eyes, compared to Crysis, it's very "mono-chromatic"... It just doesn't look as great to me...
    Call of Duty 4: Sucky/non-existing water-effects so far, and the enviroments are a lot smaller, allowing for more detail/square-foot of level... And even then, some of the effects are terrible (RPG smoke-trail, the exploding building at the end)
    Try making maps as open and large as Crysis in any other game, and I'll almost gaurantee you, they'll run worse than Crysis ...
    And if you don't think Crysis' got some of the greatest graphics ever, I urge to you watch the starting cut-scene a few more times... That's right, that briefing on the plane is done IN-GAME!
    Even Half-Life 2 doesn't have as detailed characters


    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    Please elaborate.
    People, IMHO, expect way too much from their hardware... Everybody who complain about the game not being optimized, need to look at the game properly.. It's amazingly detailed, the lighting-effects are fantastic, and the graphics in general are excellent..
    But all this comes at a price, a price which appearantly surprises most people, even though we've all seen the screenshots..
    Some people need to realise what their hardware's capable of.

    Best Regards
    Last edited by DTU_XaVier; 10-27-2007 at 06:53 PM.
    Silverstone RAVEN RV02|
    Core i5 2500K@4.4GHz, 1,300V|
    Corsair A70|ASUS P67 Sabertooth|Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty|
    Corsair Dominator DDR1600 4x4096MB@DDR3-1600@1.65V|Sapphire HD7970 3GB 1075/1475MHz|
    Corsair Force F120 120GB SSD SATA-II, WD Caviar Black 2x1TB SATA-II 32mb, Hitatchi 320GB SATA-II 16mb|Silverstone DA750 750w PSU|

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •