Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 270

Thread: Crysis Demo Unveiled, today ... i played it!

  1. #151
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    i wouldnt play this on vista ... high is pretty good looking already, sure very high looks even better, but not a whole lot , also the performance is terrible on vista ... im sticking with XP (mostly lightning + parallax mapping + draw distance)

    again DX10 with everything on high performs worst than high on XP ... i guess ill get that R700 or 9800GTX if i want to play crysis @ DX10 max out @ 1680x1050 4xAA

    cuz i doubt even Q6600 @ 3.6 + ultra SLI @ 650/2000 can have a playable fps @ 1680x1050 all very high
    Last edited by theteamaqua; 10-26-2007 at 02:32 PM.
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

  2. #152
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Moral Lowground
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by Celcius View Post
    I found this:
    http://forums.gametrailers.com/showp...54&postcount=1
    downloading it now...
    Cheers

  3. #153
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    well got it. runs pretty good @1280 on all high, with post turned too medium. its very playable on vista 32. I unistalled 64bit last month, might reinstall it this weekend on sunday.

    the game is good though, the AI is pretty nice aswell once u play it some. Looks amazing of course too boot.

    I tried the new beta and performance was worse for me, so i went back to 163.71, reloaded rivatuner. and i gained about 9 fps over the new betas. Food for thought.

    oh and it only uses 2 cores lol

    patchs should address this once its in retail.
    ~

  4. #154
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside View Post
    Last I checked, rebuying vista cost a lot more than 5 dollars. You don't NEED it either, just like you don't NEED vista/DX10 to play crysis.

    How does bioshock/cod4/ut3 selling well/being popular have to do with crysis being the game that pushes the envelope of graphics?
    That is not relevant as per my previous posts. Besides, those with Vista 64 are reporting problems with the Crysis demo making your point moot.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #155
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    That is not relevant as per my previous posts. Besides, those with Vista 64 are reporting problems with the Crysis demo making your point moot.
    And what makes your false claims relevant?

    I tried the new beta and performance was worse for me, so i went back to 163.71, reloaded rivatuner. and i gained about 9 fps over the new betas. Food for thought.
    I thought I noticed lower performance as well. How are you checking FPS?

    My UT3 FPS on the other hand seems higher...
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  6. #156
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside View Post
    How are you checking FPS?
    To display FPS ingame:
    Open up the console with " ` "
    then type:
    r_displayinfo 1

  7. #157
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside View Post
    And what makes your false claims relevant?



    I thought I noticed lower performance as well. How are you checking FPS?

    My UT3 FPS on the other hand seems higher...
    with fraps

    i have yet to try the other betas with any diffrent game, except this demo.

    163.71's work best in all my games though, and also in crysis so far.

    give it a shot. or just wait till next week when a new beta is out or a few days lol
    ~

  8. #158
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside View Post
    And what makes your false claims relevant?



    I thought I noticed lower performance as well. How are you checking FPS?

    My UT3 FPS on the other hand seems higher...
    I have made no false "claims". Maybe you need to re-read what I've posted.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #159

  10. #160
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    141
    my rig ran it at about 15-20 fps looks like i wont buy the game
    e6300 @ 3.2 w/CNPS9500
    Abit IP35-E
    2gb Corsair XMS2 DDR2 800
    XFX 7900GT w/ VF700
    2x Maxtor 160gb

  11. #161
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    508
    wonder if it's on usenet yet
    Asus P5B-D WiFi
    E6300 L626 @ 3.2@ 1.32V
    EVGA 7900GTX
    Big Typhoon Air cooling
    Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB Anniversary
    320GB SeagateSATA
    Enermax 460W PS

  12. #162
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    the Netherlands
    Posts
    558
    Quote Originally Posted by cyron1 View Post
    my rig ran it at about 15-20 fps looks like i wont buy the game
    LOL, why?

    Downloading right now
    Rig 1:
    Intel E4300 @ 3Ghz - 2gb OCZ PC2-8500 - Asus P5N-e SLI - Club3d 9600gt @ 750/1950/1100Mhz - Vista 64

    Rig 2:
    Intel celeron L420 @ 2.6Ghz - 2gb OCZ PC2-6400 - Asus P5B - XFX 8800GS 384mb - XP 32

    Laptop
    Acer Aspire 3610, Pentium M725 OC @ 2.23Ghz - 2gb PC2-3200 - crappy Intel I915 gfx

  13. #163
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    wow the demo suprised me and with that i mean its length.

    i expected a short demo that would finish within 5 minuts but this length was nice.

    But i was dissapointed about 2 things.
    the AK (dunno its correct name but u know wich one i mean) was a gun i used alot in the MP beta but in the SP demo it sucked ass.
    Its precision sucked even on short range and it didnt do any decent dmg.
    It sucked so much that i prefered dual pistols.

    The Physix are a bit overdone. I threw a handgrenade into one of them huts and the damn thing totaly fell apart.
    I then threw a box at another hut and the entire hut exploded.
    If i throw a solid wooden box at one of them huts id expect 1 or 2 panels to come of but the entire hut falling apart?
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  14. #164
    Love will tear us apart
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    wrigleyville.chi.il.us
    Posts
    2,350
    Quote Originally Posted by cyron1 View Post
    my rig ran it at about 15-20 fps looks like i wont buy the game
    Dude you have a 7900 GT. C'mon.

    Allright I'm off to install and thus torture my rig. 1920x1200 is gonna be a joke AFAICT so I'll prolly go back to my 22" CRT and test various resolutions etc.
    Dark Star IV
    i5 3570K | Asrock Z77 Extreme4 | 8GB Samsung 30nm | GTX 670 FTW 4GB + XSPC Razer 680 | 128GB Samsung 830
    Apogee HD White | 140MM UT60/120MM UT45/120MM ST30 | XSPC D5 V2

  15. #165
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    Quote Originally Posted by WrigleyVillain View Post
    Dude you have a 7900 GT. C'mon.

    Allright I'm off to install and thus torture my rig. 1920x1200 is gonna be a joke AFAICT so I'll prolly go back to my 22" CRT and test various resolutions etc.
    Say hello to 15 fps in combat. That's what I get at least... 30-40 fps 1920*1200 on medium. Looks damn nice on high though:







    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  16. #166
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    149
    Quote Originally Posted by cyron1 View Post
    my rig ran it at about 15-20 fps looks like i wont buy the game
    I was usually seeing framerates around 15-30 with everything set to high in game, 1024x768 resolution. I'm not surprised, but still...
    Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz w/ TRUE -- Abit IP35 Pro -- G.skill 2x2GB PC2 8000
    EVGA GTX 260 Core 216 + 24" Acer X243w + 23" Acer H233H 1920x1080 + 22" Gateway FPD2275W
    Logitech Z-680 + Sennheiser HD485
    80GB x25-m - 300GB VR - 500GB - 500GB - 650w Mushkin

  17. #167
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    5,425
    30-50FPS @ 1680x1050 med settings., Rig in sig. CPU is now @ 3.1GHz, VGA @ 800/900. DX10 in Vista Home Prem. 32 bit with tons of crap running.
    Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
    MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
    G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
    Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
    Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
    Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550

  18. #168
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    569
    downloading now
    1.20MB/sec
    should be done in 15 minutes
    Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.8GHz (183x21)
    Gigabyte EX58-DS4 BIOS F5
    3GB PATRIOT PC3-10666 DDR3
    Sapphire Radeon HD4870 512MB BLACK
    2x500GB SEAGATE SATA-II 7200.11
    OCZ GameXstream 750W PSU
    Antec Three Hundred Chassis

  19. #169
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    125
    Holly hell thank you!!!

    ok just 1 question, running at windows vista so it will be dx10 right? or is this demo JUST dx9?
    My recent configuration:

    Asus P5K Deluxe
    Intel Q6600 @ 3.2ghz (8 x 400 @ 1.37v) | Batch: L644G508
    4 GB G.Skill F2-6400 CL4-GBHK @ DDR2 800(2.05v) 2T | 4-4-3-5
    Samsung 400 GB Sata2
    EVGA 8800 Ultra 768MB | 3D Mark 06 score: 14.400
    Seventeam ST-750EAJ
    Gemin2 | (evercool 120 mm Aluminium)



    Dead mobos: 1
    Model: Striker Extreme

  20. #170
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    it's DX10
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  21. #171
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    anyone got 64bit to work?? on vista?? with GTS SLI i might have a chance at playing DX10 very high @ 1280x1024 ...
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

  22. #172
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside View Post
    it's DX10
    Yooooo!

    btw im just downloading at 40 KB/s, 4 Mbps here

    But at least im downloading, lol, cant wait to play it
    from what i have seen, i can play it nicely in my rig, so?
    My recent configuration:

    Asus P5K Deluxe
    Intel Q6600 @ 3.2ghz (8 x 400 @ 1.37v) | Batch: L644G508
    4 GB G.Skill F2-6400 CL4-GBHK @ DDR2 800(2.05v) 2T | 4-4-3-5
    Samsung 400 GB Sata2
    EVGA 8800 Ultra 768MB | 3D Mark 06 score: 14.400
    Seventeam ST-750EAJ
    Gemin2 | (evercool 120 mm Aluminium)



    Dead mobos: 1
    Model: Striker Extreme

  23. #173
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    322
    Quote Originally Posted by theteamaqua View Post
    anyone got 64bit to work?? on vista?? with GTS SLI i might have a chance at playing DX10 very high @ 1280x1024 ...
    Apparently 64bit and SLI aren't working in the demo yet.

    For me, at 3.6Ghz, 2Gb and GTX at stock, 1280x1024, DX10, Very High and Vista with latest beta drivers we see 21 fps average. No bad, but i'm hoping for that to be at least 25 fps, and hopefully 30 by the time the game is released. Fingers crossed eh?

    One word to sum the game up so far...

    Breathtaking.


    CPU's:- Xeon 3060 | Q6600 G0
    Mobos:- MSI X48C (Coming!) | MSI X38 Platinum | Asus P5K Deluxe
    RAM:- Kingston HyperX PC3-14400 | Team Xtreem PC2-6400C3 | Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 | Kingston PC2-9600
    Graphics:- PNY 9800GX2 | EVGA 8800GTX
    PSUs :- Antec TPQ-1KW | Ultra X-Pro 600w EE
    Cooling:- Nozzled FuZion | MCW60 | DDC w/ DDCT-01s | PA120.3

  24. #174
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Q6600@3.5ghz
    HD2900XT default
    1680x1050
    Game settings : HIGH
    windows XP 32bit


    FPS in SS









    (when more action the FPS come down 20-25 )



    very bad optimized game


    regards

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  25. #175
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Richie P View Post
    Apparently 64bit and SLI aren't working in the demo yet.

    For me, at 3.6Ghz, 2Gb and GTX at stock, 1280x1024, DX10, Very High and Vista with latest beta drivers we see 21 fps average. No bad, but i'm hoping for that to be at least 25 fps, and hopefully 30 by the time the game is released. Fingers crossed eh?

    One word to sum the game up so far...

    Breathtaking.
    yeah right now im playing @ 1440x900 high DX9 with sunshafts, am getting ~ 35fps when moving around, 40+fps standing still,

    but @ 1280x1024 all very high i get about 20~fps ... not playable
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •