Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 100 of 100

Thread: 8800GT Spec is out! 65NM CONFIRMED !!

  1. #76
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Kyle at HardForums said dont expect a new high end until next year

  2. #77
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    Kyle at HardForums said dont expect a new high end until next year
    Why would anyone believe him?

  3. #78
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    The new high ends are not coming till Feb/March 2008.

    You can choose to believe kyle or someone from xs and no one will offer concrete proof because what you hear from inside sources cannot be referenced.

    Take that as you wish.

    Perkam

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    The new high ends are not coming till Feb/March 2008.

    You can choose to believe kyle or someone from xs and no one will offer concrete proof because what you hear from inside sources cannot be referenced.

    Take that as you wish.

    Perkam
    Sorry but when a man cannot get even simple public information correct, I find it extremely hard to believe he gets correct "info" from his "sources."

  5. #80
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Sorry but when a man cannot get even simple public information correct, I find it extremely hard to believe he gets correct "info" from his "sources."
    There is NO official public information regarding high-end of NV or ATI anywhere. If you still believe that these cards may appear this year (don't even know where you've taken this info) you'll be disappointed.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    any rumor on the dual RV670 or dual G92??
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

  7. #82
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    EDIT: Several swedish sites has already Club3D 8800GT 512MB listed and lowest price is 1 884,00 kr or ~$292 USD incl VAT or 1,507.20 SEK / ~$233 USD excluding VAT. Prices will prolly go down yet, they're usually a bit high before launch especially in Sweden.

    http://www.prisjakt.nu/produkt.php?p=237516
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 10-16-2007 at 02:19 PM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  8. #83
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    There is NO official public information regarding high-end of NV or ATI anywhere. If you still believe that these cards may appear this year (don't even know where you've taken this info) you'll be disappointed.
    Nothing to do with the information, just more of WHERE/WHO the information is coming from and his past/present reputation.

  9. #84
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    continues too look more and more apealing, mabey its time to get read of my 7900's
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0

  10. #85
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Knightwolf, a single 8800GT 512mb, when OCed, has enough power for there to be a performance increase over two 7900s.

    Perkam

  11. #86
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    Knightwolf, a single 8800GT 512mb, when OCed, has enough power for there to be a performance increase over two 7900s.

    Perkam
    not just a little i would expect it to go for at least 2.0 to 3.0 times faster than the 7900gs sli when oced. more so if what we have been seeing is true and you can reach 900mhz core
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  12. #87
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803

    $199



    ...rv670...?
    Last edited by adamsleath; 10-16-2007 at 08:16 PM.
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

  13. #88
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    942
    You do realise that a faster cpu can skew the results a fair bit?
    Q9550 || DFI P45 Jr || 4x 2G generic ram || 4870X2 || Aerocool M40 case || 3TB storage


  14. #89
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    I'm not sure where you get those scores from, but I just ran 05-3dmark with my 8800gts 320 and it came out to 16,6k
    So, my question is.
    With the 256bit bus compared to the 320bit bus on the older model, how will the newer ones perform?

    Is the gt slower than the older 8800gts and how much faster is the newer 8800gts than the old?

    I'm really wondering if I should sell my card or if it doesn't matter at all at this point
    Last edited by Eddie3dfx; 10-18-2007 at 07:09 AM.
    Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators

  15. #90
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UE , Romania, Baia Mare
    Posts
    72
    I realy like those G92 pictures... my 6800Ultra Wather Block from Innovatek will still fit on G92... that's COOL ...Now I'm Realy thinking on a G92 with 512 memory ... bicouse I got the BLOCK B-)

    http://www.dospara.co.jp/contents/im.../040827-06.jpg
    Last edited by ediflorianus; 10-17-2007 at 09:58 AM.
    ------ NO SIGNATURE ------

  16. #91
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    Looks from what I have seen, the gt is going after the 2950 pro but will not be faster than the 8800gts.
    The new 8800gts will be faster the older 8800gts and has 640megs of memory, but is priced around $310+
    still $50-60 more than an 8800gts 320.
    Does this sound correct?
    Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Pleasant Hill, MO
    Posts
    1,211
    sounds correct... best thing to do is probably wait and see as usual.

    Ryan
    "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

    Abit IP35 Pro
    Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 @ 3200 w/ Tuniq Tower
    2x2gb A-Data DDR2 800
    AMD/ATi HD 4870

  18. #93
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    10009
    Posts
    3,628
    I want to know if this is supposed to be a mid range card then what's the high end like?
    Last edited by trans am; 10-17-2007 at 12:18 PM.

  19. #94
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Vegas ,NV
    Posts
    1,636
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    I'm not sure where you get those scores from, but I just ran 06-3dmark with my 8800gts 320 and it came out to 16,6k
    So, my question is.
    With the 256bit bus compared to the 320bit bus on the older model, how will the newer ones perform?

    Is the gt slower than the older 8800gts and how much faster is the newer 8800gts than the old?

    I'm really wondering if I should sell my card or if it doesn't matter at all at this point

    umm dont you mean mark 05? unless your GTS was in the 750+core range you cant get that type of score. with a healthy oc on the cpu too boot.

    why are these reviews showing mark 05 anyway? who cares about 05, use 2006.

    anyway i think the next high end part well may be a GX2 config, seeing how nvidia has gone to the 65nm gpu. it could very well work this time, unlike the 7900GX2. Or we may see a whole new deal
    ~

  20. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    BEYOND THE SUN - SCOTLAND
    Posts
    476
    new 8800GTS FTW

  21. #96
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    Looks from what I have seen, the gt is going after the 2950 pro but will not be faster than the 8800gts.
    The new 8800gts will be faster the older 8800gts and has 640megs of memory, but is priced around $310+
    still $50-60 more than an 8800gts 320.
    Does this sound correct?
    NO!!!


    the new 8800GTS has 512mb (Not 640mb) and 256-bit




    seeing the 3dmark results posted in this thread , both 8800GT and new 8800GTS are faster than the actual 8800GTS 320mb/640mb

    new 8800GTS maybe faster than 8800GTX ............




    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    I'm not sure where you get those scores from, but I just ran 06-3dmark with my 8800gts 320 and it came out to 16,6k

    you Got 16.6K with 8800GTS 320mb in 3dMark 2006?????????? , maybe you meant to say 3Dmark 2005





    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    So, my question is.

    With the 256bit bus compared to the 320bit bus on the older model, how will the newer ones perform?
    - only have 256-bit but have more Stream processors , 8800GT has 112SP and new 8800GTS has 128SP (same as 8800GTX/Ultra) against the 96SP of 8800GTS 320mb/640mb

    - 8800GT also have more shader clock (1500mhz against 1200mhz of 8800GTS ) ---- new 8800GTS probably will have even more (specs not released yet)

    - Core/memory clock also higher , 8800GT has 600Mhz core and 1800Mhz memory against the 500mhz/1600mhz of 8800GTS 320mb ----- the new 8800GTS probably will have even more (specs not relelased yet )

    - also 8800GT are 65nm and 8800GTS 320mb/640mb are 90nm , so the overclock will be better like we already saw here (8800GT @ 900Mhz) while the average 8800GTS Overclok its around 650mhz - 680mhz .


    ---8800GTS ("old") --------------------------8800GT ----------------------- 8800GTS (New) ----

    ---90nm --------------------------------------- 65nm ------------------------------- 65nm ---
    ---96 Stream processors ---------------------112 Stream processors --------------- 128 Stream Processors---
    ---320Mb/640MB -------------------------------256Mb/512mb ------------------------ 512MB---
    ---320-bit --------------------------------------256-bit ------------------------------- 256-bit---
    ---500Mhz core ---------------------------------600mhz core-------------------------- ???????? ---
    ---1600Mhz memory -------------------------1800mhz memory ----------------------- ???????? ---
    ---1200mhz shader clock --------------------1500mhz shader clock ------------------- ???????? ---



    ----- 8800GTX

    ----- 90nm
    ----- 128 Stream processors
    ----- 768mb
    ----- 384-bit
    ----- 575Mhz core
    ----- 1800Mhz memory
    ----- 1350mhz shader clock




    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post

    Is the gt slower than the older 8800gts and how much faster is the newer 8800gts than the old?
    NO , it´s faster




    BTW: the 3dmark 2006 scores you see in this thread of 8800GT its with AA 4x & AF enable

    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 10-18-2007 at 06:39 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  22. #97
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    Oops, didn't mean to write 06-3dmark.
    I was doing a comparison to the 05 scores that someone posted.
    http://service.futuremark.com/orb/re...0&UID=11587944

    I cannot replicated the 06 scores because I don't have a full copy of 06 3dmark.

    For those that ask why people use 05-3dmark, because it's more of a gpu benchmark since it relies less on the cpu for calculations.
    06 is an overall benchmark.

    This is at default stock 8800gts no oc.
    x3210 cpu oc to 2.85 on asus p5n-e sli, 1066 crucial ballistix
    Stock on this 8800 I think is 560mhz-gpus, 850mhz-memory

    I was in the 17's with my evga 680i, since the oc was at 3.5, but the board was so unstable and I had to rma it a handful of times, that I downgraded to a more stable but less powerful board.

    Here is the real issue though.
    Nvidia is selling the 8800s at a very good pace and gtx models as well.
    Why would they bite their own nose by releasing a cheaper model that performs better than an 8800gtx which costs 2x as much and yet have the newer gtx come out next year.
    It doesn't make any sense..
    They in a sense would be killing off the gtx model, putting the ultra model in bad spot being $500+ and losing customers from the 8600 gts models... All this from the profit of $199 boards?
    Thats like saying mercedes just came out with a car thats much better than their 80k model and they are pricing it at 45k

    Also, why are all these benchmarks from taiwan or china.. why hasn't one vendor here been able to produce real benchmarks?
    Everyday these specs and numbers are changing, meanwhile tomshardware is doing reviews on beer water-cooling for god sakes!

    Also, last but not least, these benchmarks mean jack squat unless you are using an fps benchmark in games.
    The 06-3dmark that most people own will not let you bench with any effects, anti-aliasing, etc.
    Thats why the 2900's do so well in 06-3dmark, yet when it comes to gaming, they hit the sh*tter when all the effects are on.
    What they need is a benchmark that has 2 min scenes from about 5-6 games all combined into one.
    Last edited by Eddie3dfx; 10-18-2007 at 07:23 AM.
    Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators

  23. #98
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    559
    Depending on when the new 8800gts comes out, I might just use my step-up on that. I play on 1280x1024, so the memory isn't really a concern for me. More stream processors and an improved manufacturing process (greater o/c ability) are what intrigue me.

  24. #99
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    Asus P6T, I7-920, 6gb ocz xmp, 4890, Raid 0-1 Terabyte, full watercooled - Triple Loop 5 radiators

  25. #100
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    http://www.foxconnchannel.com/produc...D=en-us0000048

    Foxconn is the first w/ the 8800GT page up. Not suprising I guess since they are a huge OEM manufacturer and the 8800GT is probably going into a lot of OEM computers.

    Picture of the single slot design too!

    Interesting part is the core: G96 ?!

    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT
    Core: G96
    CoreClock: 600MHz
    Pixel Pipeline:
    Vertex Pipeline:
    RAMDACs: 400MHz
    Memory Type: GDDR3
    Memory Size: 512MB
    Memory Clock: 1800MHz
    Memory Interface: 256bit
    Graphics Bus Technology: PCI Express x16, Gen 2.0
    Cooler: Fansink
    Connectors: DL DVI-I + DL DVI-I + HDTV
    Special Features: Full DirectX 10 Shader Model 4.0 Support
    PCI Express 2.0
    Full HDCP Support
    16x Anti-aliasing Technology
    128-bit High Dynamic-Range Lighting
    Essential for Windows Vista™

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •