Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
Not wanting to upset AMD Fans, you should leave Intel out of your comments. Why do you have to bring up Intel? Oh wait that was meant to be negative towards Intel LOL!

Anyway, Dothan lost some benchmarks to Turion because Dothan ran on old generation Platforms that used slower FSB, slower and much less memory Bandwidth, slower I/O, crappier Video and etc... It had little to almost nothing to do with the Processor. Desktop Yonah (still on a crappy Platform) vs, X2 proved that. See Anand's first Yonah Review?

It is kind silly of when;
Bring up Intel in a positive Manner in an AMD thread and it's Thread Crapping.
Trash out Intel or just write negative stuff even if it's false and all is OK.

I say this to you and MovieMan with a lot of respect, if folks are warned for bringing up Intel in a good way, folks should be warned for bringing up Intel in a negative way or using false info. These kinds of lines "This was how the 90nm Turion 64 parts could defeat the 90nm Dothan parts for real-world workloads." invites a reply. Then we get folks whining about "We're not talking about Intel". See the problem? You guys can't have it both ways. If you hate Intel that frackin' bad, go to the AMDZone or etc..? Please?
lol

Both Turion 64 and Dothan are outdated; their time has past. EG people talk about Prescott now and it's no problem. Did I say AMD rawks and Intel sucks? No, Intel clearly has a better processor on all fronts (power and performance and cost, but only for non-superbudget computers) at the moment. Stop being so sensitive.

The problem with you is that you don't know much about the subject matter and make incorrect conclusions from data. That's the main reason why you always get flak from your replies (good example is your previous comment about prefetching).