Quote Originally Posted by nikhsub1 View Post
I was hoping to have each mount in a graph, but that may be too busy? ROFL.
Well, if you did a separate graph for each set of results, then it wouldn't be too bad... you'd just have a lot of graphs.

Actually, the 6.5 nozzle data should really be discarded... the nozzle was not inserted properly, made that mistake on the 4.5mm at first too. To clarify, the 6.5 nozzle is just the nozzle, the 4.5mm nozzle testing is with a PROPERLY inserted nozzle and the ek barb o-ring between top and mid plate - so this is nozzle + bow if you will. The 'bowed' fuzion is with no nozzle and just the oring. Now, the GT hybrid was something I had to try... I wanted to be certain that the better performance of the GTX was due to the deck height of the top and the diagonal flow arrangement and NOT due to the more square mount.
Chart updated accordingly....

Oh and Alex, your Apogee GT Flat? in the graph is actually the GT bowed but mounted VERTICALLY and not horizontally...
The Apogee GT (bowed, vertical) is/was already on the chart... You have a set of tests that are labeled "Apogee GTX" (between the bowed FuZion test and the last 4.5mm nozzle test) that I'm assuming are of a stock/flat GTX, no?