My WB Testing Results, Excel file inside.

[nikhsub1]

Is this what you were thinking of, Scott? (rounded mean average of your test runs)

Couple oddities... averaged, the FuZion 6.5mm nozzle data seems odd (borked mounts, perhaps?), wtf is the 'Apogee GT Hybrid', and I'm assuming that the 4.5mm nozzle tests were non-bowed (and that the bowed FuZion tests were with no add-in nozzle), yes?

I was hoping to have each mount in a graph, but that may be too busy? ROFL.

Actually, the 6.5 nozzle data should really be discarded... the nozzle was not inserted properly, made that mistake on the 4.5mm at first too. To clarify, the 6.5 nozzle is just the nozzle, the 4.5mm nozzle testing is with a PROPERLY inserted nozzle and the ek barb o-ring between top and mid plate - so this is nozzle + bow if you will. The 'bowed' fuzion is with no nozzle and just the oring. Now, the GT hybrid was something I had to try... I wanted to be certain that the better performance of the GTX was due to the deck height of the top and the diagonal flow arrangement and NOT due to the more square mount. I guess a picture is worth...

Oh and Alex, your Apogee GT Flat? in the graph is actually the GT bowed but mounted VERTICALLY and not horizontally... bout 1-1.5C better as you can see. Gabe mentioned that on the GT with a DUAL CORE (single die) it matters which way the water flows.