Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
I've read that months ago.

Since Nehalem hasn't even taped out , I would take the usual spoon of salt with the Inq article.

The FSB is simply out of breathing room and I doubt Intel will use a CSI link as a FSB , simply doesn't sound rigth.
That looks like a good article.

Given that Intel's design cycle is 5 years long, what could you possibly mean by the "since Nehalem hasn't even taped out" argument? Don't you think that the design would have been close to finalized BEFORE it has been taped out?

In the graphics card realm, the design cycles are much shorter, and the competition much fiercer, so there's a lot of misinformation spewed all the time. However, I really can't think of any time TheInq has been wrong about CPU specification information (not clock speed information... specification information).