Oh really? Can you tell me why AMD reduced its R&D with 500million and Intel have reduced it with 300million, and might reduce it further?
Dont mix factory cost with R&D.
There is no reason a computer cant last 5years or more. Today it usually last 2-3 years due to people wanting the newer and faster.
No, in the middle of the Vista development security got alot more focus. Alot of people was moved to the XP Sp2 project aswell. And they had to restart most part of the Vista project with security in mind after reeducation of the staff.
So you admit that competition is the issue. You dont develop it overnight. IA64 performance in itself is good. Compability performance sucked. AMD did as I described. Added a cheap touch and we sit in the same garbage for the next 20 years. If over 10 billion$ cant change architecture in a competitive environment. Then what is needed?
It actually worked fine for transmeta. Dont tell me nobody will enter the market. If the profit is good enough there to be made, then you will get competition. Its no more different on how Via, Cyrix, Transmeta and Nexgen started.
The only barrier there is, is the direct foundry advantage a company can have.
Bookmarks