Results 1 to 25 of 93

Thread: Celeron 430 @ 3ghz vs FX-57 @ 3160mhz , the new Celeron rocks

Threaded View

  1. 06-24-2007, 11:42 AM #11
    HamidFULL
    HamidFULL is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    976
    Quote Originally Posted by overcrash86 View Post
    around -106 idle and -104 load
    What!!?? 106C or 106F???
    please tell me in C

    How I can find one?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kasparz View Post
    I don't think that idea comparing dualcore vs singlecore would be any good. Otherwise in superpi it should be about as fast as E6700.
    Celeron are always great clockers because of less cache, less heat and this seems to be great chip for budget gaming system.
    you are right
    Last edited by HamidFULL; 06-24-2007 at 11:46 AM.
    www.HotOverclock.com Founder & Editor in Chief
    ---------------------
    Upgrading to X58 ...

    Q6600 G0 @ 3.8GHz FSB 423MHz w/Swiftech H2O 120 Compact Dual 120mm fan Last OC Details Here
    abit IX38 QuadGT Rev1.0 (X38 Rev.01)
    4x1GB Patriot +SL PC2-6400 Based on Aeneon AET760UD00-25D Chips! @ 1:1 1000MHz 5-4-4-8 2.0v
    Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 A2 Normal Edition @ Core 820MHz Mem 2100MHz
    Display 19" LG FLATRON L1960TR LCD Contrast 3000:1 Response Time 2ms Lightning Fast!! w/f-Engine Chip and DFC Technology
    HDD 250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3250820AS
    HDD 120GB Maxtor Max.10 6L120M0
    PSU Zalman ZM1000-HP 1000 Watt Six 12v Rail and Dual Seperate Board
    A4Tech X7 Gaming Mouse X-750BF Dual Laser Engin w/2500DPI
    More about my Memory : it can do 950MHz 4-4-4-8 2.0v Stable and 1100MHz 5-7-7-12 2.2v Stable and 1200MHz 6-8-8-21 2.3v not Stable!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules