so for say FX Agena .. the Bus speed is actually 1800MHz not 3600Mhz??
so for say FX Agena .. the Bus speed is actually 1800MHz not 3600Mhz??
E6600 @ 3.6
IN9 32x MAX
EVGA 8800Ultra
750W
Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Bike: ZX6R
If all the hype is for nothing, the official performance numbers will bring the people "down" to reality.
I don't need self-appointed crusaders convincing people a product is going to suck before release...behaviour that goes in line with my disdain for R600 coverage at DT.
And I'm making that a rule...so unless you want your posts edited, stay out if you're not a fan of the product...at least until you see official launch numbers.
Perkam
"Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Abit IP35 Pro
Intel Core 2 Quad 6600 @ 3200 w/ Tuniq Tower
2x2gb A-Data DDR2 800
AMD/ATi HD 4870
i think the later Kuma with TDP = 45w will be a nice cpu for overclockers, something like the E4300 now
Soon to be :
ASUS P8P67 Deluxe, Intel SB i7-2600k, G.Skill Rj-X F3-12800CL6D-4GBXH, MSI HD6950 2GB, Corsair 750AX, Intel 80GB G2 SSD, DELL U2410
Used to be: SaFrOuT
So...for the 2.4 GHz models...does that mean 200x12?
Computer:
Case: Corsair 750D Airflow Edition
Mobo: Gigabyte Aorus X570 Ultra
RAM: Team TForce Xtreem ARGB 3600C14 2x16gb XMP
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5900x
Graphics: EVGA (rip) RTX 3080 FTW3
PSU: Seasonic Focus GX 850w
Cooling: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
NVMe: SKHynix P41 Platinum, Samsung 980 Pro 2tb
SSD: Micron 1100 2TB, Samsung 860 Evo 1tb
HDD: WD SE 2TB, WD Black 1tb 3 platter with over 10 years of power-on time
Not entirely, according to the Hypertransport group. It will be 1800Mhz one way, 1800Mhz the other way. I think someone mixed up transfers with ghz.
http://www.hypertransport.org/tech/tech_htthree.cfm
However I also think they are twice as wide now as before.
So, at 1.8Ghz (Lowest speed) I guess it would be 14.4GB/sec, compared to todays 6.4 and 8GB/sec.
Else a 100mbit line would be 200Mbit too. If you count the same way.
And yes on the last part.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
ahh i see what u mean .. cuz i thought they like double pumped or something ..
so HT is actually 1800MHz
E6600 @ 3.6
IN9 32x MAX
EVGA 8800Ultra
750W
Actual HT is 2000mhz. 1000mhz up & 1000mhz down for one link in 16bits.
HT 3.0 can go up to 2.6ghz ( 5.2ghz ), with a 0.75x factor a maximum of 3.466ghz for the CPU, And for kuma 2.8ghz with HT@ 4.2ghz => 2.1ghz up and 2.1ghz down for a bandwidth of 16.8GB/s, about 110% better. ( actual provide 8GB/s )
Quad have lower HT, but Quad can run on AM2 with a minimal performance loss, a lower HT 3.0, is not serious.
About Barcelona, Barcelona has 3 link HT @1000mhz, the next one will have 3 ht link on HT 3.0.
I'm interessted by 4x4+ ^^
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/cont...docs/40546.pdf
k10 instruction latencies are now well-known
theoretically we needn't tests to become aware of k10 computing power
Microarchitecture comparison here
Last edited by MAS; 05-05-2007 at 05:16 AM.
Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
Bike: ZX6R
The increased clocks sound good to me...
Remember a few days back some AMD exec said that K10 is performing up to 50% better (?) than Kensfield on the same clock... But everyone knows that Intel will raise their clocks conciderably, so most likely they will perform pretty much the same given a same price frame.
Overclocking and ease of upgrade will win our hearts this time...
http://www.hardocp.com/Originally Posted by Kyle@HardOCP
Seems BArcelonas will be up and running in San Francisco soon: ).
Can someone go there and grab some pictures ?![]()
![]()
![]()
Hi to everyone thats my first post here.![]()
It wont be so easy. If intel going to have higher cloacks just to match the performance with amd, then Intel has to be sure that it would left enough room for overcloacking it, otherwise ocing the Amd chip with the lower cloacks to higher you will have again the same 50% lap in perfomance.
Yep, you are right for pointing that out, but bare in mind that 45nm proces used will surely alow intel to stay in the current tdp, and the whole architecture has proven it self to be made for OCing.
I agree, with you and can't wait to se the end results, and I hope AMD will surprise us with great OCability but I not betting on them in recent light
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
w0mbat, look at #68
I want to see a K10 benchmark!
Bookmarks