MMM
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 104

Thread: AMD: Barcelona quad-core 50% faster than Intel’s quad-core Xeon

  1. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,125
    Quote Originally Posted by freeloader View Post
    I own both, so a fanboy I'm not. Why am I saying that AMD is full of ,? Who's seen these benches beyond AMD walls?

    Release some god damn benches by now and throw us a freaking bone.

    AMD doesn't seem to understand their userbase. Sure us hardcore freaks account for maybe 1% - 2% of their total sales, but that 1% probably represents 10% or more based on word of mouth. I build atleast a hundred systems a year. They used to be about 85% based on Athlon 64's; now that number has dwindled to about 15%. I'm one person out of thousands who now recommends Intel systems. If you want me to tell my customers/friends to wait for something better from AMD, then let me know what's coming down the pipeline and what it's capable of.

    I don't need to know every thing about the chip, but some nice video/audio encoding benches mixed with a few game benches would do just fine.
    Sorry, those are all the benchmarks where Barcelona loses badly to current C2D and C2Q, let alone Penryn. They'll try to keep THAT under wraps for as long as possible.

  2. #77
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    E6600 and 6000+ seem not to be low end


    PS new intel prices are not anywhere now

    for instance now i can buy E6600 for 320USD, 6000+ for 250 USD
    Then you need to shop a better place.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #78
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stamford, UK
    Posts
    1,336
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    IMC is a semi joke. Core/Core2 already showed an IMC aint a winner.
    Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
    WOW! Really, there are a lot of very stupid people.
    *sigh*....
    AMD gone Intel, AMD has always been more responsive. I can tell for sure.
    FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
    eXceed TJ07 worklog/build

  4. #79
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
    This is not true!
    Some AMD CPUs have better price/performance than some Intel CPUs and vice versa.



    WOW! Really, there are a lot of very stupid people.

    that chart doesnt show me anything tbh.
    for people that DONT overclock wich is the majority and dont demand ot much from a PC wich is also the majority AMD is atm the best solution.

    i can pick up a X2 3600 for 55 euro.
    i can pick up a decent Nforce4 mobo for 45 euro.

    cheapest core2duo is some 90 euro and then u stil got to add the motherboard.

    So sorry but for people that dont overclock AMD is the cheapest thus best solution.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  5. #80
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by eXceededgoku View Post
    *sigh*....
    AMD gone Intel, AMD has always been more responsive. I can tell for sure.
    Wow, must be those 0.000000050sec less latency that does it for your super perception.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  6. #81
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    1,716
    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream View Post
    that chart doesnt show me anything tbh.
    My point was that not all AMD CPUs have better performance/price than Intel CPUs.
    for people that DONT overclock wich is the majority and dont demand ot much from a PC wich is also the majority AMD is atm the best solution.
    I agree. But there are people who DO overclock and are demanding more performance than the average user. For them, AMD is not the best choice.

    i can pick up a X2 3600 for 55 euro.
    i can pick up a decent Nforce4 mobo for 45 euro.
    Yes, thats an excellent budget combo, which costed 3 times more a year ago. Probably it offers the best performance/price, but not all people are looking for the less expensive CPU and mainboard.

    cheapest core2duo is some 90 euro and then u stil got to add the motherboard.
    Also the C2D budget mainboards are little beat more expensive than K8 budget mainboards. On the other side, almost without a performance penalty you can use a DDR2-533 on a C2D system and save some money.

    So sorry but for people that dont overclock AMD is the cheapest thus best solution.
    I disagree. Like I said eariler, some AMD CPUs have better performance/price than some Intel CPUs. For example the C2D E4300 and the E4400 are performing faster than X2 4400+ and X2 4800+, but are costing same. And if we consider the power consumption, the heat dissipation and the overclockability, than the C2D's are much better choice over K8.
    Last edited by gOJDO; 04-23-2007 at 12:35 PM.

  7. #82
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Is an overclocker forum here but really how many people really overclock their machine? 5%? 10%? 20%? If someone has numbers please show me cause i think that an interesting point.
    Last edited by AbelJemka; 04-23-2007 at 01:05 PM.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  8. #83
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    @gOJDO
    dunno were ur from so i dunno the ram prices there but overhere there is almost no price diffrence between DDR2-533 or DDR2-667

    cheapest 2048 kit 533 is 78 euro cheapest 667 kit is 80 euro.

    and like said i didnt say AMD is best for everyone but AMD is best for those that dont overclock and dont need a Uber CPU.

    and the cheaper nforce 4 mobos arent that bad, in perf and features the diffrence between them and the nforce 570s is verys mall, but the difrence in price is rather big.
    and some of them cheap motherboards clock rather nicely

    @AbelJemka
    impossible to say how many people overclock.
    i got a m8 that OCed his E6600 a full 200mhz and he now thinks hes the king. im leaving him int hat illusion.
    Last edited by Starscream; 04-23-2007 at 12:27 PM.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  9. #84
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Separate subject:

    We should all root for both of them to do well as thats what keeps the technology advancing and the prices down.
    .....lets get back to smearing AMD for not showing some real world numbers here!
    QFT!!!!


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  10. #85
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    AMD did it before with the AMD64 over the P4.

    no reason they cant do it again.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  11. #86
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    shame on you currently amd has the best performance/cost ratio - and you recommend people who obviously wil not OC expensive intel-based systems

    Most of my customers care about performance only. Cost is an afterthought.
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

  12. #87
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    That's the real key to this statement. What will be the highest speed that AMD will release this cpu at.
    If they are going to make a 2400mgz as top end and are comparing to Intels clovertown at that same speed they may well be right but does it matter?
    What I want to know is how their top quad compares to Intels top quad.
    That's all that matters. The rest is smoke and mirrors.

    So agree The future is quads

  13. #88
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Teroedni View Post
    So agree The future is quads
    I totally agree, I just like 2 of them on one board!
    4 would be better.
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  14. #89
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by MAS View Post
    shame on you currently amd has the best performance/cost ratio - and you recommend people who obviously wil not OC expensive intel-based systems
    Well AMD CPU's have got cheaper after an year or so of Conroe's Arrival, even now AMD does not have best performance/cost ratio. Keep in mind Intel lowered its prices. So it is difficult to think about it, AMD can win something and Intel others but that is related to low end customer.

  15. #90
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    589
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    I totally agree, I just like 2 of them on one board!
    4 would be better.
    16 cores... Man that would be hugeeeeee power! Raw FPU would be off the charts Encoding a movie in High Definition in 10 minutes
    i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
    2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
    HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
    WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
    Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500

  16. #91
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] Teroedni View Post
    So agree The future is quads
    Well it depends, thinking about 5 years or so I would say yes. It is difficult to program using multi cores at this time but sure things will change soon.

  17. #92
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stamford, UK
    Posts
    1,336
    ^^ :O now that's what I want but instead on K10 . Man all those cores must be starved for bandwidth....
    FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
    eXceed TJ07 worklog/build

  18. #93
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho View Post
    What like this?.....



    The CPU is mislabeled in this shot. While it is technically a clovertown core, these are Tigerton CPUs.
    16 slobber's


  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by Metroid View Post
    Well AMD CPU's have got cheaper after an year or so of Conroe's Arrival, even now AMD does not have best performance/cost ratio. Keep in mind Intel lowered its prices. So it is difficult to think about it, AMD can win something and Intel others but that is related to low end customer.
    Performance market is so small compare to mainstream and low end so i don't think u can simplify things so simply. For mass market AMD price or good cause mass marker not overclock cpu.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  20. #95
    Xtreme Monster
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Performance market is so small compare to mainstream and low end so i don't think u can simplify things so simply. For mass market AMD price or good cause mass marker not overclock cpu.
    I'm not simplifying anything, please read my statement again.

  21. #96
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho View Post
    What like this?.....



    The CPU is mislabeled in this shot. While it is technically a clovertown core, these are Tigerton CPUs.
    Don't tell me all they will do is 1600..or is that all you can show
    Upgrade cpuz to 1.39 and it will at least get the socket type correct.
    (Stands in line for Tigertons!)
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  22. #97
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    Some Sun/IBM/HP servers have 100+ threads
    ...

  23. #98
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stamford, UK
    Posts
    1,336
    oh.... I was completely unaware :O. Better go learn my stuff before I post lol
    FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
    eXceed TJ07 worklog/build

  24. #99
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho View Post
    if you're talking about the clock speed.... you'll see that EIST is enabled. They are 2.66 by default. I would get a new CPUz shot but I try not to fire that thing up unless i have to. It's definitely not the quietest machine that I have. Damn thing sounds like a plane taking off.

    Edit: They are socket 604 BTW.
    Hmm, Tigerton's are socket 604? Like my Irwindales..Interesting.
    Ok, you made up my mind, Harpertowns it is.
    771 over 604 anyday.
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  25. #100
    Xtreme Guru adamsleath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,803
    ...so is Barcelona faster than the xeon?
    i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •