Have you played with FSB drivestrengths?507 here.
Have you played with FSB drivestrengths?507 here.
Been testing various settings effects on max fsb most of the evening. Can do 500 w/ stock nb cooling but Im struggling to pass that. Maybe 10-20 in there with better cooling.
![]()
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
that chipset is mighty cool for that voltage, and stock cooling...
Maybe so, but its the stock cooler. 120mm over the ram likely helps alot though.
![]()
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
lol i figued, as that 26c PWM temp betrayed you. How about temps without the fan?BTW, what's up w/ that ram? No Mushkin?![]()
2600K | Maximus IV Formula | 12G Corsair 1600 C8 | 2x 6950 | Coolermaster Scout
I tried a bunch of GTL values, didnt find it did much either. Got some more stuff I am going to test though, I know there is a little more room for max fsb. You guys find any mem settings helped fsb at all other than trfc?
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
2600K | Maximus IV Formula | 12G Corsair 1600 C8 | 2x 6950 | Coolermaster Scout
Yes. I can scale much farther CAS4 than 5
I also run normal micron alpha timings for given CAS...which is very hard on some DIMMs, but works well for me. I really wish i never sold my 8888's!
So, 3-3-3-9-12-21-2-3-2-3-2-3-2-2-5
4-4-4-12-16-28-3-4-3-2-3-2-2-5
5-5-5-15-20-35-3-5-3-2-3-2-2-5
For 450mhz or lower. Otherwise, I find increasing TRC and TRFC to not really make a difference, but keep in mind that micron like it's timings on this board I find. don't forget addres/CMD and clocking drivestrengths!
was much easier to get 1200mhz rams 4-4-4-12 than 5-5-5-15.
What strikes me as odd is YOU asking. WTF?
oh, and if you use above settings poster's for strength, i think 2.0v vdimm is almost too much or DIMMs will sustain damage.
Last edited by cadaveca; 04-19-2007 at 02:21 PM.
hmm so upping that puts more stress on the ram dose it
so running this 24\7 may not be so healthy?
e6600
2x1g TEAM XTREEM 800@4-4-4-12 D9GMH
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y83/dasa09/pc.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y83/dasa09/pc1.jpg
Control CPU Frequency: Manual
x CPU Frequency (Mhz) 390
PCI-E Overclock: 160
Software Reset Clockgen: Enabled
Memory Overclocking: Enabled
Overclock Frequency (Mhz): 475
CPU Vid Control: 1.5v
CPU VID Special ADD: AUTO
DDR2 Ram 1.8 Voltage: 2.34v
CPU VTT 1.2V Voltage: 1.31
NB Core 1.2V Voltage: 1.48
NB PLL 1.8V Voltage: 2.13
NB PLL 1.2V Voltage: 1.21
NB PCI-E 1.2V Voltage: 1.22
NB Core 1.2V convert from: 2.14
SB Core 1.2V Voltage: 1.23
CS Output Timing: Delay 1/4 Clock
CK Output Timing: AUTO
Dual channel Split Mode: Auto
ADDR/CMD Driving Pre-AMP: Disabled
ADDR/CMD Driving Strength: 15
Clocking Driving Pre-AMP: Always
Clocking Driving Strength: 15
Address/Command Timing: 1T
Memory Timing Select: Manual
CAS Timing (TCAS): 4
Read RAS-CAS Delay (TRCDR): 4
Write RAS-CAS Delay (TRCDW): 2
RAS Precharge Time (TRP): 4
Cycle Time (TRAS): 8
Row Cycle Time (TRC): 12
Refresh to Active (TRFC): 28
Bank to Bank CMD (TRRD): 3
Write Recovery (TWR): 5
Read-Write Command (TRTW): 3
Write-Write CS (TWTW_CS): 2
Write-Read Command (TWTR): 3
Write-Read CS (TWTR_CS): 2
Read-Read CS (TRTR_CS): 2
Read Data Transfers: 5
Last edited by dasa; 04-21-2007 at 04:50 AM.
you are at the edge for Micron. I've seen 12 and 2.4v kill a set![]()
Well, I found loosening tRFC/tRD on my 965 boards allowed up to 10 more fsb than tighter settings; however, doesnt seem to be doing much w/ this board so that is why I asked.
Whats that supposed to mean, we cant compare settings and experiences here or what?Originally Posted by cadaveca
That's correct, it's best for your mem to use the lowest drive strength you can without losing stability.
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
ok thanks for the info
shame this stuff isnt as tough as bh-5 it could handle just about anything
guess ill play around with a lower 1t speed or higher 2t
but for now 500mhz 2t 2.3v strength 5 will do
Question. Do you find hci or dos memtest is able to find memory errors with this board? Im having some 3d issues that lead to bsod and minidump (which is usually mem) but stupid memtest finds nothing in several hours..
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
Yeah. I have found that 1T will be memtest stable, then need 0.5v to retain 3D stability. I have tried tweaking drive strengths to no avail. Sync can cause issues... as well...same deal.
Also found that chipset volt issues can be hidden by over-volting mems...this will lead to 4-5hour stability( for me, but that may be jsut the DIMMs i got), but then BSOD/dump. But i found that TDU will not load if this is the case...
Sync requires avg 0.15v chipset more than unlinked. FSB drive can help, but i have not found more than using .05 less, so cannot be bothered ATM.
Ok thanks that's good to hear. Ive been troubleshooting every piece of hardware in this system all weekend trying to figure wtf the 3d issues were coming from. Stupidly I ruled out the mem early when it passed a couple thousand % hci memtest; however now that i thi9nk about it a lil more the crashes seem very mem error-like so I am going to retest using 1 stick at a time. I guess 3d mark is the new memtest for this board huh.![]()
MB Reviewer for HWC
Team OCX Bench Team
even that is not quite enough. all other apps I have can run, and TDU will fail. I checked system resources while the game was loaded, too, and found nothing all thta amazing...it's strange to be sure, but...
verify chipset volts are enough. sync means lots of volts, unlinked means just a little less.
give a bit less vDIMM.
tighten timings. (trc is good for this)Still good? then chipset, most likely...1.8v voltage tho. this settingis very important, i find, when dealing with ram tweaking. corrupt bios if not enough is VERY possible.
ah bugger looks like i was to late ever since i lowered the settings i have been havening stability problems
back to stock settings now and getting a lot of instability and memtest isnt showing much other than the odd error in test 1
ram might be about stuffed
If stability is an issue, CMOS clearing shuold be standard practice BEFORE looking at components. Settings/BIOS can be easily corrupted by an unstable boot. This board is pretty resilient, but it's not bulletproof.
ive been havening trouble posting after clearing bios with the jumper or telling bios to load defaults
ive had to leave the pc turned of at psu for a few min then come back to it and then it will run again
it seems to go ok for a while running prime for a few hours passing memtest playing games ect. then i start running into severe instability again
i dont know yet i still have more testing to do but it is starting to look like something is not as good as it was
with some luck it may turn out that nothing is damaged time will tell i guess
Last edited by dasa; 04-24-2007 at 08:10 AM.
I do not agree with this at all..my first board was far from resilient...one setting of 1:1 and the bios I guess corrupte and the board developed an unrecoverable C1E error
Second board developed issues after being 26hr prime 95 blend stable, 3Dmark stable, memtested....
adios and goodbye RD600..not looking back..I personally feel the board is awesome for options but just was not of good quality after having 2 with serious issues
My Heat
i5 2500k @4.5ghz Raystorm
Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 16gb(4x4) G.Skill PC12800 Ripjaws X
x1900xt MCW60
Rad: Thermochill PA120.3 3YL SL/ Pump: DDC2 w/ Petra's top 7/16in ID masterkleer
Corsair 120gb Force GT SSD/ 1TB WD Black Caviar SATA
X-Fi music/SH-203B/H62L/LH-20A1L
Corsair HX620w /Acer AL2223W/modded TJ07
LoL. But you gave up, and here I am, still tweaking away at my leisure, first board.
I've spent time with three of these boards, all behaved similar. With just the first board, I've spent far more time delving into the possibilities than you have, so to me, my greater experience means I have a better understanding of what's going on.
You couldn't even figure your problem out.
Last edited by cadaveca; 04-24-2007 at 08:13 AM.
Bookmarks