ForceWare 158.16 surfaces

[DilTech]

I get the feeling it might have something to do with those missing muls....

[Cybercat]

I get the feeling it might have something to do with those missing muls....

Indeed.

[RFC Rudel]

drivers are a new tool in performace war?

imagine if nvidia castrate his drivers to see what the r600 is.......

distracting the enemy?


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[SrJabardo]

mascaras entao rapazola ta tudo??

Well, people, can someone give me a direct download link for the drivers?

Btw, wich drivers have you used mascaras? the modded ones or the "untouched" ones?

Say something


Hugs and kisses

[mascaras]

mascaras entao rapazola ta tudo??

Well, people, can someone give me a direct download link for the drivers?

Btw, wich drivers have you used mascaras? the modded ones or the "untouched" ones?

Say something


Hugs and kisses

im using 158.19 for WIn XP 32 bit



Forceware 158.19 XP 32bits

Forceware 158.19 XP 64bits



for Vista :

Forceware 158.18 Vista 32bits

Forceware 158.18 Vista 64bits

man the 158.19 from nv's driver page sux big time ... .16 is better atm

i tryed Both (they are the same driver but 158.19 are official ) and i have same 3dmark 2005/2006 score , when you say 158.19 sux and 16 are better ,are you talking about what??? Image quality ???


because in performence they are the same ........



97.94 and 97.92 in image quality are better ..... (maybe thats the reason of 158.xx scores better in benchmarks)

regards

[nuclearjock]

My benchies have increased as well.

But in Flight Simulator 2004, I ran 8XQ AA with 97.94 and all was well.

With 158.19 8XQ AA looked like no AA at all..

Also, the profile for Aquamark 3 F*&d up when I tried to disable AA, started giving me windows error messages...

165.01 did the same.

Back to 97.94 for now.....

[kiwi]

These beta are really great for benching, improved 3dmarks a lot