MMM
Page 2 of 26 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 648

Thread: Swiftech unveils Apogee XT new flagship waterblock

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    972
    I think the mounting on the Swiftech blocks are perfect. I hate the old long old silver screws with white plastic spacer washers to mount the blocks.
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 4.8GHz
    MOBO: GIGABYTE GA-G1.Sniper M5 MATX 1150
    MEMORY: G.SKILL Trident X 8GB 2400MHz 9-11-11-31 1T
    GPU: 2 x eVGA GTX 780 SC
    SOUND KRK Rokit 5 Limited Edition White Studio Monitors
    SSD: 4 x Samsung 128GB Pro's Raid 0
    PSU: SeaSonic Platinum 1000W
    COOLING: 2 x Alphacool NexXxoS UT60 Full Copper 420mm 6 x Swiftech Helix 140mm Fans
    CASE: Lian Li PC-C32B TECH STATION MOD build log coming soon
    MONITOR: ASUS VG278HE Black 27" 149Hz
    O.S: Windows 7 Pro x64

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    514
    Quote Originally Posted by nikhsub1 View Post
    Most modern blocks perform differently when oriented differently. The difference is, Swiftech is TELLING you which way to do it for best performance while other manufacturers are NOT. You don't have to listen to the instructions and you will just get lesser performance, the choice is yours.

    *ninja edit*

    Unless there is a limitation with the block where it can NOT seat properly on the socket if oriented not as directed.
    If it is only a recommendation then Swiftech should specify it correctly instead of saying "MUST BE PARALLEL" (like shown on the image diagram. From what I understand with that sentence, we must mount it in such a way or it'll either not function totally or performance would be seriously terrible.

    Modern blocks again have reached it's limit and there's not much of improvements anymore except for some cosmetics. I don't think this GT would give even a 5C advantage over the GTZ. We need someone here to do a proper review as those found on some sites are utter nonsense at times because they aren't true.

    Intel Inside

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,319
    Just to double check...
    Does this use the same backplate as the GTZ?

  4. #29
    Never go full retard
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Vegas
    Posts
    3,984
    Quote Originally Posted by iandh View Post
    We're approaching the limits of modern machinery here (traditional machining techniques at least).

    The only "advances" I see from here are not forwards, but more sideways. Aesthetics, flow restriction, and fine tuning for new CPU die configs.
    Preaching to the choir there. Also, doesn't mean you won't see companies tweak and explore just to get the top spot back. This is the first I've set eyes on the design, and I'm really curious how the recessed micropin will do versus the recessed microchannel of the HK. Either way, I just like to see the battle for the crown.

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by faster3200 View Post
    Just to double check...
    Does this use the same backplate as the GTZ?
    yes exactly, i am keen to know so that i dont have to pull out my mobo to put this on when i get mine. (will order one as soon as i can)

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,489
    Quote Originally Posted by skinnee View Post
    Preaching to the choir there. Also, doesn't mean you won't see companies tweak and explore just to get the top spot back. This is the first I've set eyes on the design, and I'm really curious how the recessed micropin will do versus the recessed microchannel of the HK. Either way, I just like to see the battle for the crown.
    That's what's kinda cool in a way, it's anybody's game now, and with every new CPU die config, we have a whole new game to play. Not that it hasn't always been that way...

    My only "complaint" is that if the pin matrices/channels in blocks get any finer, they will become incredibly susceptible to physical damage and damage from corrosion (as if any happens, the pins/channels will literally disappear ).

    PM sent BTW.
    Last edited by iandh; 10-06-2009 at 08:40 PM.
    Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb

  7. #32
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,397
    Wow. So where exactly do we draw the line between "micropin" and "filter"?

    Looks nice. I'll have to look hard and see if this one's in my budget - too many waterblocks already.
    i7 2600K | ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z | GTX Titan | Corsair DDR3-2133

  8. #33
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    DAMN!!!! That's friggin beautiful!!! Nice job Gabe! I agree with the rest we have reached the limits with current block designs. I would be interested to see someone come up with a similar design as the Stinger to see if it gives any improvement over current designs. I am also curious if making the bottom part as thin as humanly possible would help in the transfer of heat. I know most blocks start out as 1/4" copper, but I wonder if making one with a base that was 1/16" thick would be better. I doubt you would be able to still pull off a bow, but still, I think it would be interesting.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,489
    Quote Originally Posted by MpG View Post
    Wow. So where exactly do we draw the line between "micropin" and "filter"?

    Looks nice. I'll have to look hard and see if this one's in my budget - too many waterblocks already.
    I think I've actually made that comment before

    It isn't meant as a stab at the design, just a comment that these types of blocks are most definitely best suited for use with pure distilled.
    Asus G73- i7-740QM, Mobility 5870, 6Gb DDR3-1333, OCZ Vertex II 90Gb

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    980
    A question for Gabe, since swiftech cpu blocks always show 1 way to mount them.

    If the die under the IHS is symmetrical, then shouldn't mounting it 180 deg from how shown in the pictures be the same?

    I just always wondered this, since it makes no sense to me, being only 1 way. Unless I am not thinking of something.
    Desktop
    [Asus Rampage III Gene] [i7 920 D0] [12GB OCZ3B2000C9LV6GK] [HIS HD 5970] [SeaSonic X750 Gold ] [Windows 7 (64bit)] [OCZ Vertex 30GB x3 Raid0] [Koolance CPU 360] [XSPC Razer 5970] [TFC 360 rad, D5 w/ Koolance RP-450X2]
    HTPC
    [Origen AE S10V] [MSI H57M-ED65] [ i5-661 w/ Scythe Big Shuriken] [Kingston HyperX LoVo 4GB ] [ SeaSonic X650 Gold ] [ OCZ Vertex 30GB SSD ] [ SAMSUNG Spinpoint 640GB 7200 RPM 2.5"][Panasonic UJ-225 Blu-ray Slot Burner] [ Ceton InfiniTV4]

  11. #36
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    I am pretty sure the way the block mounts it puts the bow of the block directly in line with the way the chips are under the IHS. This way you are making more contact with them for better heat transfer. All blocks, with bows at least, seem to work better in one direction versus the other. This is why Vapor noted that the Heatkiller got better results in one direction versus the other. It doesn't mean you can not orientate it the other way, just that to maximize the block it's better this way.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    245
    I was going to say SCREW YOU about the lack of space for compression fittings......
    Then i saw the turnaround thing and i am damn pleased sure to be my next block if it stacks up in other tests.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    793
    I'm really impressed! I think the inlet option is fantastic and a great idea. And the sloping angles on the top makes for a really nice looking block. Function before form though, so I'm eagerly waiting tests!!!
    They say the definition of madness is doing the same thing and expecting a different result.
    Howlin' Pelle Almqvist

    Project Log Completed: all internal v1000

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    514
    I think you can still use compression with 2 x 45 or 90 degree rotaries.

    Intel Inside

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    980
    Quote Originally Posted by Utnorris View Post
    I am pretty sure the way the block mounts it puts the bow of the block directly in line with the way the chips are under the IHS. This way you are making more contact with them for better heat transfer. All blocks, with bows at least, seem to work better in one direction versus the other. This is why Vapor noted that the Heatkiller got better results in one direction versus the other. It doesn't mean you can not orientate it the other way, just that to maximize the block it's better this way.
    yeah, but if the die (or dies) are symmetrically packaged, which seems like every chip is; then anyway you look at it, each set of parallel sides are mirror images of one another.

    edit: nevermind, i found the reason on my own, I think ;p

    The layout of blocks of the die. It's probably hotter over the core areas... and maybe the inlet is over the cores the way swiftech suggests to mount it.
    Last edited by Diverge; 10-06-2009 at 09:45 PM.
    Desktop
    [Asus Rampage III Gene] [i7 920 D0] [12GB OCZ3B2000C9LV6GK] [HIS HD 5970] [SeaSonic X750 Gold ] [Windows 7 (64bit)] [OCZ Vertex 30GB x3 Raid0] [Koolance CPU 360] [XSPC Razer 5970] [TFC 360 rad, D5 w/ Koolance RP-450X2]
    HTPC
    [Origen AE S10V] [MSI H57M-ED65] [ i5-661 w/ Scythe Big Shuriken] [Kingston HyperX LoVo 4GB ] [ SeaSonic X650 Gold ] [ OCZ Vertex 30GB SSD ] [ SAMSUNG Spinpoint 640GB 7200 RPM 2.5"][Panasonic UJ-225 Blu-ray Slot Burner] [ Ceton InfiniTV4]

  16. #41
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by aoch88 View Post
    I think you can still use compression with 2 x 45 or 90 degree rotaries.
    As far as I can tell, you can use 3/4" OD compressions just fine if you turn the inlet plate around

  17. #42
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Nice block you got there gabe. . .BUT, you seem to be welching on something you agreed to back in May.

    Let me refresh your memory.

    Quote Originally Posted by gabe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    Gabe, start getting these newer DDC's into distro channels please!
    OK.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denmark / Aarhus
    Posts
    1,036
    Is this also optimized for unlapped cpus as well? (Meaning HK3.0 will outperfom it on lapped cpu?)
    Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
    Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
    Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
    Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Varna, Bulgaria
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by gabe View Post

    The block is fully optimized for Intel Ci5 and Ci7.
    Please show us some s775 performance data or maybe @Vapor could clarify this in his upcoming tests.
    Core i7 3930K|EK Supreme HF 2 x PA120.3 1x TFC Feser 240 DDC3.25 XSPC ResTop 3x SUNON Maglev 6xPanaflo FBA12G12H 2xSanAce 9G1212H1011 4xEK-FC R9-290X|RIVE|4XR9 290X|Corsair 4x2GB GTX2|Corsair AX1500i|WD1001FALS + SSDNOW V300|HP LP2475w|Luxeon 5.1WH|Logitech G500|Lian Li A70B

  20. #45
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by Waterlogged View Post
    Nice block you got there gabe. . .BUT, you seem to be welching on something you agreed to back in May.

    Let me refresh your memory.


    I have a question actually, is the only difference between the DDC 2 and the DDC 3.2/3.25 is the impeller? If so, could I not use one of the impellers from my 4(yes 4 , they all eventually died) dead DDC 2's to obtain DDC 2 performance from the DCC 3.2's?

    Core 2 Duo(Conroe) was based on the Intel Core Duo(Yonah) which was based on the Pentium M(Banias) which was based on the Pentium III(Coppermine).

    Core 2 Duo is a Pentium III on meth.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    kibbler the nibbler
    Posts
    984
    That's a beautiful looking block, and it looks like we're finally done with the recessed inlets/outlets! I'm buying one as soon as they're available.

  22. #47
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Imperial Palace, UDE of Pitatopia
    Posts
    8,396
    Quote Originally Posted by Vienna View Post
    I have a question actually, is the only difference between the DDC 2 and the DDC 3.2/3.25 is the impeller? If so, could I not use one of the impellers from my 4(yes 4 , they all eventually died) dead DDC 2's to obtain DDC 2 performance from the DCC 3.2's?
    No, the PCB got a complete over haul from the DDC2 to the 3.x and it looks like small changes (from what I can tell) from the 3.x to the 3.x5's. The impellers will work, they just won't make any of the 3.xx work like a DDC2.
    Circles SucQ!

    If your annoyed by sigs telling you to put things in your sig, then put this in your sig

    Bribery won't work on me...just say NO to AT!!!

  23. #48

  24. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    588
    I am glad that I have not used my Apogee GTZ SE yet.

    This block looks sick.

    I must have 8!

  25. #50
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    514
    I doubt it'll give you a lot of temp difference in real life usage. You guys can try it and see if it really happens. I've got tired of changing blocks, the differences are somewhat minimal You'd be better off investing the money on something eles.

    Intel Inside

Page 2 of 26 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •