Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 531

Thread: ATi HD 3870 X2 (R680); Official Specifications & Images

  1. #301
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    Btw gentlemen, i would not be disappointed if the card scores exactly the same as 2 3870's in CF (subsequently, priced no more than €350,-)
    The interesting part should happen with 2 3870X2's in CF. That's when the card should find its reason for existance: like full AA + AF at 1600x1200 and up with never below 50 fps in all existing recent games.
    We still need to see the X-fire numbers.
    Last edited by Unbornchild; 01-11-2008 at 07:33 PM.
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

  2. #302
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by mascaras View Post
    with Cat 7.11 used and CPU its only +90mhz (200marks difference)


    HD3870X2 + Q6600 @ 3333mhz + CaT ?? = 17400 marks (windws Vista)

    2x HD3870 + Q6600 @ 3420mhz + CAT 7.11 = 17200 marks (windows vista)


    regards
    With all things to consider:
    Cat used, OS, other PC Hardware, etc a 90+MHz difference in OC should be noticeable in any benchmark result. However, the CPU score is lower then at 3.33GHz. Since we know a healthy CPU OC on a C2Q can affect SM 2/3 I have to wonder what the score would be if it was clocked at 3.33 instead of 3.40. Since that current CF setup (cpu 3.4x) didn't beat X2 at 3.33 I assume that it would be lower. Thus the reason why I say it was a boost. I could be wrong but that's what I assumed.


    Quote Originally Posted by Unbornchild View Post
    Btw gentlemen, i would not be disappointed if the card scores exactly the same as 2 3870's in CF (subsequently, priced no more than €350,-)
    The interesting part should happen with 2 3870X2's in CF. That's when the card find it's reason for existance: full AA + AF at 1600x1200 and up with 50+ fps in all existing recent games.
    We still need to see the X-fire numbers.
    Not only that if the new drivers add anything to performance. But most of all if it's actually the same as CF and it works in all current games that's a win-win in my book. The concern (for me as well as others) is compatibility with all current gen games.

    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 01-11-2008 at 07:33 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #303
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Kanadier
    Posts
    115
    If we were to assume for the sake of argument that 4-way Crossfire was possible, and it consumed 8 times the power of a standard 3870, and that the rest of the system at load sucked in about 200 watts (I pulled that number out of my pooper), and if we were to further assume you lived in one of a few select parts of the United States or Canada, playing games on this could pump out right around 400 liters of CO2 an hour.

    You should physically be able to feel the planet warm around you.

  4. #304
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    APPLES TO APPLES COMPARISON

    First, Q6600@3000Mhz, 3870CF stock, Catalyst 7.12, Vista x64 totally untweaked




    For the lazy ppl:

    - SM2.0 = 6137
    - SM3.0 = 7510
    - CPU Score = 4373
    - Total Score = 15736

    Second, Q6600@3330Mhz, 3870CF stock, Catalyst 7.12, Vista x64 totally untweaked



    - SM2.0 = 6849
    - SM3.0 = 7933
    - CPU Score = 4808
    - Total Score = 17100

    Perfomance boost? I don't think so . Again, I'm asking myself how the 3870X2 will perform in games without CF profile vs 3870CF, that's the real question.
    Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 01-11-2008 at 07:36 PM.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  5. #305
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    APPLES TO APPLES COMPARISON

    First, Q6600@3000Mhz, 3870CF stock, Catalyst 7.12, Vista x64 totally untweaked




    Second, Q6600@3330Mhz, 3870CF stock, Catalyst 7.12, Vista x64 totally untweaked



    Perfomance boost? I don't think so . Again, I'm asking myself how the 3870X2 will perform in games without CF profile vs 3870CF, that's the real question.
    I believe you concentrated more on the final score more so then the sm 2.0/3.0 scores. In which there is a difference found between CF and X2, even with you having a higher CPU score. What does this mean for Cat 8.1? Don't know yet until it's released. In all we are still only comparing CF to CF with different CPU overclocks and different OS.
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 01-11-2008 at 07:44 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #306
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    I have concentrated in all the scores. You should consider Aero is turned ON in my tests, SpeedStep is ON too, and it's just reboot and run.

    The 3870X2 scores are with Aero OFF, and that makes impact in SM2.0 and SM3.0 perfomance. Again, there is no perfomance boost in this card for 06. The CPU clock on my test is exactly the same too...
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  7. #307
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    I have concentrated in all the scores. You should consider Aero is turned ON in my tests, SpeedStep is ON too, and it's just reboot and run.

    The 3870X2 scores are with Aero OFF, and that makes impact in SM2.0 and SM3.0 perfomance. Again, there is no perfomance boost in this card for 06. The CPU clock on my test is exactly the same too...
    And your use of Vista 64 therefore not the same as the previous benchmark results.
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 01-19-2008 at 08:44 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #308
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle View Post
    And your use of Vista 64 therefore not the same as the previous benchmark results.
    OK, keep thinking all you want, the scores are there. There is no magic in this card, just two 3870s. And 3DMark is a 32bit app
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  9. #309
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    OK, keep thinking all you want, the scores are there. There is no magic in this card, just two 3870s. And 3DMark is a 32bit app
    I see the tables have turned now, before it wasn't ok to use 2 of the same CPUs at different OCs but we are suppose to allow for 64 bit OS over a 32 bit OS? In any case we need to wait until the video card is released and we will see. Like another poster stated (and I assume some won't care) if the frame rates of an X2 are the same from CF it doesn't matter. I believe what will be important (as I've posted before) is if it's compatible with all current gen games. If there is an actually improvement over CF, the more the better!
    Last edited by Eastcoasthandle; 01-11-2008 at 09:23 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  10. #310
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    somewhere called australia
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    I'm asking myself how the 3870X2 will perform in games without CF profile vs 3870CF, that's the real question.
    Indeed.

    AMD driver ain't my cup of tea.

    In any case, 3870X2 at last will force NVIDIA to release their next highend card.
    i7 4770K (EK-HF)
    ASRock Z87 Professional Fatal1ty (BIOS L1.42)
    Trident X F3-2400C10D-8GTX
    GTX 480 SLI (Koolance NX-480) / E-MU 1212M / Antec Quattro 1.2kW / HP ZR30w / Lian Li 1010B
    Cooling; TFC Xchanger 240 & RX360 / 655 w/EK-Top V2 / Tygon / BP Compressions

  11. #311
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    472
    Quote Originally Posted by Anth Seebel View Post

    AMD driver ain't my cup of tea.
    Because you have a GF8800. Now shall us with a ATI card go posting in nVidia threads that Forceware is not our cup of tea?
    System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*

  12. #312
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    313
    11% more clock results in nearly 9% more 3d power ? wtf ?

    3dmark06 really sucks.
    System : E6600 @ 3150mhz, Gigabyte DS3, 4gb Infineon 667mhz, Amd-Ati X1900XT

  13. #313
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bronx-NY
    Posts
    40
    Does anyone know if games will treat this card as a single gpu or does the game need to support crossfire in order to support both cores. If the card is treated as a single gpu in game and utilizes both cores then thats a significant advantage over a dual card setup

  14. #314
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    stockton, ca
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Anth Seebel View Post
    Indeed.

    AMD driver ain't my cup of tea.

    In any case, 3870X2 at last will force NVIDIA to release their next highend card.
    Nvidia is releasing a 9800GX2. I wouldn't call it next gen, but more of a reply to this card. The 9800GX2 is two g92's with 1gig of ram per card. It is rumored to run 30% faster than the ultra.

    The winner between these two cards will come down to price and driver support imo. The 3870x2 is rumored to be ~$400 which would put it at a very nice price. Article speculate the 9800gx2 around the same price, but I doubt that. I don't see nvidia pricing the 9800gx2 less than current GTX's and ultras. Just doesn't seem like good pricing strategy, but who knows.

    And last I have heard, nvidias next gen cards have been pushed back to summer.

    Link to OCforums discussion

    --pak
    Q6600 400x9 1.5vcore
    P5kdeluxe Ballistix 2x1gb
    D5 coolrad32t Fuzion
    EVGA 8800GTS 320 600/900
    2xRaptor 36g Raid-0
    Creative X-Fi Extrememusic
    PCP&P silencer 750 copper
    Built for the sole purpse to play World Of Warcraft and troll XSforums.
    Heat

  15. #315
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Kinshou Kuma View Post
    Does anyone know if games will treat this card as a single gpu or does the game need to support crossfire in order to support both cores. If the card is treated as a single gpu in game and utilizes both cores then thats a significant advantage over a dual card setup
    For me , thats the thing that realy matters :

    Crossfire must be enable in CCC with one HD3870X2 ????

    if so , then the games need to suport crossfire (same thing as 2x HD3870 CF )


    regardss
    Last edited by mascaras; 01-12-2008 at 08:31 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  16. #316
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    It looks to me like the on-board chip is going to take care of the communication between the GPUs. Hardware X-Fire instead of software is in theory, much better. The system should not know the difference.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  17. #317
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner View Post
    It looks to me like the on-board chip is going to take care of the communication between the GPUs. Hardware X-Fire instead of software is in theory, much better. The system should not know the difference.
    lets hope thats the case but ive seen some screenys on here (in sure i have) of windows device manager and it shows two gpus'

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  18. #318
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    That's the point: "Hardware" Crossfire should work with every game out there, if the driver is good. No need to work in every CF profile for every concrete game, always use AFR, that 3DMark perfomance translated to every game in every situation.

    Bah sounds too good to be true. But let's hope so.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  19. #319
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    Quote Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown View Post
    lets hope thats the case but ive seen some screenys on here (in sure i have) of windows device manager and it shows two gpus'

    yep :


    HD3870X2 Crossfire (4 GPUs)







    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    That's the point: "Hardware" Crossfire should work with every game out there, if the driver is good. No need to work in every CF profile for every concrete game, always use AFR, that 3DMark perfomance translated to every game in every situation.

    Bah sounds too good to be true. But let's hope so.


    if we need to ENABLE CROSSFIRE in CCC to HD3870X2 Works so its same thing as TWO HD3870 in CF (need CF profile) , thats the big question ........





    regards
    Last edited by mascaras; 01-12-2008 at 09:09 AM.

    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  20. #320
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,554
    thats actually quite weird.

    If its called 3870x2 because its got two gpu's onboard why are all of those called 3870x2? wouldnt that mean 4 cards?

    My Free-DC Stats
    You use IRC and Crunch in Xs WCG team? Join #xs.wcg @ Quakenet

  21. #321
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    stockton, ca
    Posts
    264
    can you run three of these?

    --pak
    Q6600 400x9 1.5vcore
    P5kdeluxe Ballistix 2x1gb
    D5 coolrad32t Fuzion
    EVGA 8800GTS 320 600/900
    2xRaptor 36g Raid-0
    Creative X-Fi Extrememusic
    PCP&P silencer 750 copper
    Built for the sole purpse to play World Of Warcraft and troll XSforums.
    Heat

  22. #322
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Origin_Unknown View Post
    thats actually quite weird.

    If its called 3870x2 because its got two gpu's onboard why are all of those called 3870x2? wouldnt that mean 4 cards?
    That's because two of them are in CF. So Windows interpretes each GPU as a 3870X2, total of 4. Weird, but who cares about the names

    CCC showing 4 GPUs is interesting. Now, with 2 3870CF I can only see one. As someone in this thread already posted, it can be an indicative of the possibility of multiple monitors conected to the "secondary cards" in the new driver.

    No pak, you can only run two of these for a total of 4 GPUs.

    mascaras I don't think we will have to enable CF running only one 3870X2. Not because it doesn't need it, but because it's already activated by default when the driver detects the card.
    Last edited by STaRGaZeR; 01-12-2008 at 09:29 AM.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  23. #323
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    somewhere called australia
    Posts
    121
    Quote Originally Posted by Unbornchild View Post
    Because you have a GF8800. Now shall us with a ATI card go posting in nVidia threads that Forceware is not our cup of tea?
    No because I had a 2900XT (ala close to 3870 performance) and Im not subjecting myself to AMD's driver team again, while they ain't got a true next gen part. 3870X2 does not entice me at all.

    Post what you like, it's a forum, Im posting my experience, pretty simple.

    I look forward to what NVIDIA put out after 9800X2.
    i7 4770K (EK-HF)
    ASRock Z87 Professional Fatal1ty (BIOS L1.42)
    Trident X F3-2400C10D-8GTX
    GTX 480 SLI (Koolance NX-480) / E-MU 1212M / Antec Quattro 1.2kW / HP ZR30w / Lian Li 1010B
    Cooling; TFC Xchanger 240 & RX360 / 655 w/EK-Top V2 / Tygon / BP Compressions

  24. #324
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475
    Quote Originally Posted by pak View Post
    can you run three of these?

    --pak
    Actually you can run even 4 in single system. but you'll be able to combine only two in XF since there's only one connection interface available. though with good skills you may use 4 of these cards for some GPGPU.

  25. #325
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    First half of this year is the time of the dual card "monsters"...not quite exciting...

    Does anyone know if the production 3870 X2's will use solid caps? There's a few pics of pre-production models with tall electrolyte caps...
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."

Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 310111213141516 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •