Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 100

Thread: 8800GT Spec is out! 65NM CONFIRMED !!

  1. #51
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Mobile01


    03


    05


    112SP

  2. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9
    Almost 15K in 3DMark05?! I'd better wipe the drool off of my keyboard

  3. #53
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    ok so what does a 8800gts and 2900xt score in 05? and with 112stream procs this looks better and better all the time.
    Last edited by [XC] hipno650; 10-11-2007 at 05:40 PM.
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  4. #54
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Nice 112 SPs would be awesome deal! Please let it be true, then this card will be a very valuable midrange card and it seems it's probably even faster than current 8800GTS cards in Unreal3 engine based games or Crysis for example (112 SPs and shader at 1.5GHz). But it seems NVIDIA need to put the bar kinda high looking at 2950 Pro anyways and both NVIDIA and ATI seems to have very high interest in winning this midrange battle, but I see more important for DAAMIT to win and hopefully 2950 Pro will be a midrange beast.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 10-10-2007 at 10:58 PM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by sxs112 View Post
    Mobile01


    03


    05


    112SP

    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    ok so what does a 8800gts and 2900xy score in 05? and with 112stream procs this looks better and better all the time.



    IS This even possible ???????????

  6. #56
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Wow theoretical flops on that thing at 1.5GHz SP * 112 * 2 or 3 puts it at near GTX levels

    What rig is that set up though? It's hard to compare 3dMark05 vs. 3dMark05 if the two setups are different as CPU and what not does play a difference

  7. #57
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    49
    wow is the 8800 gt ourperformed the 8800gts 640 in 3dmark 05, then nvidia has a real winner here. I can't wait to see how ati will react to this card, cuz so far its been nothing but disapointment from ati....

  8. #58
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    793
    omg! This is one killer VC with a price that's right on the pocket!


    Rig Specs
    Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 4.0ghz 1.37v - DFI Lanparty UT P35 TR2 - 4x1GB Team Xtreem DDR2-1066 - Palit 8800GT Sonic 512MB GDDR3 256-bit
    160GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM SATA II 8MB Cache - 320GB Western Digital Caviar 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Liteon 18X DVD-Writer /w LS
    640GB Western Digital SE16 7200RPM SATA II 16MB Cache - Corsair HX 620W Modular PSU - Cooler Master Stacker 832
    Auzen 7.1 X-Plosion - Zalman ZM-DS4F - Sennheiser HD212 Pro - Edifier M2600



    Custom Water Cooling
    Dtek Fusion Extreme CPU Block - Swiftech MCR-220 - Swiftech MCP655-B - Swiftech MCRES-MICRO Reservior - 7/16" ID x 5/8" OD Tubings
    Dual Thermaltake A2018s 120mm Blue LED Smart fans.


    www.mni-photography.site88.net

  9. #59
    Xtreme PSU Tester
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,380
    Quote Originally Posted by FatHippo View Post
    wow is the 8800 gt ourperformed the 8800gts 640 in 3dmark 05, then nvidia has a real winner here. I can't wait to see how ati will react to this card, cuz so far its been nothing but disapointment from ati....
    More like this is how Nvidia is reacting to ATI's new card because the 2950 is certainly NOT a disappointment.

  10. #60
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Xbit Labs werent using a Q6600, smashell.

    Perkam

  11. #61
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    Xbit Labs werent using a Q6600, smashell.

    Perkam
    Ahhhhh ... that explains it.

  12. #62
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Kinda wishing I had an SLI board instead of a Crossfire one about now ... Asus P5W DH Deluxe here.

  13. #63
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Sweden, Örebro
    Posts
    818
    112 SPs confirmed by NVIDIA marketing material, 1.5 GHz individual clock.

    OCWorkbench even dared to quote the material directly
    That's more than I dare to.

    //Andreas

  14. #64
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Nice so it's confirmed then.

    NVIDIA's got nothing to worry anymore IMO if any specs got released it's not like ATI in case for some reason they didn't already know all about it will be able to do much changes anymore and besides since the specs are so good like they are for that pricetag, I'd rather see NVIDIA (and ATI) start boasting about the specs rather than keeping it secret to hype up the market even more.

    I wanna see lots of sales of these cards if they are as good as the indications have been so far to show to NVIDIA and ATI tight price and smart specs configuration to run today's and most anticipated upcoming PC games titles that isn't too expensive to produce but still can provide good performance can make the consumers very happy and is the winning deal worth aiming for.

    It looks like a good timing to release the killer midrange cards right now with so many huge anticipated PC games titles swirling around.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 10-11-2007 at 11:50 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  15. #65
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,450
    250$ Holy moly, now i for sure wont one!!!

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Southern California. USA.
    Posts
    632
    The bang-for-buck on this just seems rediculous. With some overclocking it seems like it could pass up the GTS 640 without breaking a sweat.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by kuhla View Post
    The bang-for-buck on this just seems rediculous. With some overclocking it seems like it could pass up the GTS 640 without breaking a sweat.
    I'm thinking a bit higher actually, 8800GTX @ stock performance probably.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  18. #68
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    I'm thinking a bit higher actually, 8800GTX @ stock performance probably.
    Probably more...

    This is alot nicer of a card than I originally thought it would be. I still think the "8800GT" name is a ruse of sorts. Typically when nVidia makes mid-range cards they generally fall about half of the high end cards.

    A lot of people say that the 9800GTX is a 1tflop card and on paper, a 256 shading unit 512bit card would do the trick.

    Somehow I'm inclined to believe that they will (at the last minute) change the name to 9600GT and announce the full 65nm G91 with the specs mentioned above. In addition to an 9600GTS with 128 shading units.

    Either way these numbers from a marketing perspective look really fishy. They're definatly up to something to say the least by offering a card that is very close if not at their $600 GTX / Ultra offerings at 1/2 ~ 1/3 of the price.
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Sentential View Post
    Probably more...

    This is alot nicer of a card than I originally thought it would be. I still think the "8800GT" name is a ruse of sorts. Typically when nVidia makes mid-range cards they generally fall about half of the high end cards.

    A lot of people say that the 9800GTX is a 1tflop card and on paper, a 256 shading unit 512bit card would do the trick.

    Somehow I'm inclined to believe that they will (at the last minute) change the name to 9600GT and announce the full 65nm G91 with the specs mentioned above. In addition to an 9600GTS with 128 shading units.

    Either way these numbers from a marketing perspective look really fishy. They're definatly up to something to say the least by offering a card that is very close if not at their $600 GTX / Ultra offerings at 1/2 ~ 1/3 of the price.
    They could keep it 8800GT and just name the next high end the 8900 or something

    They didn't name it 8900GT because they don't want a large number undercutting current sales of the GTX and Ultra, which they want to keep milking until they are replaced at the high end

  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by zerazax View Post
    They could keep it 8800GT and just name the next high end the 8900 or something

    They didn't name it 8900GT because they don't want a large number undercutting current sales of the GTX and Ultra, which they want to keep milking until they are replaced at the high end
    If the card is as strong as those benchmarks show it will do so with or without an "geforce 8800" name
    NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
    Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
    Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
    PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro
    Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)

    Heatware: 13-0-0

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    BOSTON
    Posts
    366

    i don't know...i don't know...
    this or 2950xt...
    time will tell
    AMD 64 3700+ San Diego
    Geil Ultra 1GB PC3200 RAM
    250+640GB
    Sapphire X850XT PE
    SINGLEC0RE4EVER

  22. #72
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    3,410
    NVIDIA Announces 112 SP 8800 GTS Works w/ Original 8800 GTS In SLI

    NVIDIA told their AICs not to market the new Geforce 8800 GTS 640MB as a card that has 112 SPs on board (upgraded from previous 96 SPs) but Partners can label it as a special edition, or OC edition. Also the new 112 SP 8800 GTS will still work with the original 96 SP variants in SLI configurations. Further NVIDIA stressed that they will not offer an upgraded 112 SP 8800 GTS in 320MB configurations.


    Source: VR-Zone


    http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=41924


    [Review] Core i7 920 & UD5 » Here!! « .....[Review] XFX GTX260 216SP Black Edition » Here!! «
    [Review] ASUS HD4870X2 TOP » Here!! «
    .....[Review] EVGA 750i SLi FTW » Here!! «
    [Review] BFG 9800GTX 512MB » Here!! « .....[Review] Geforce 9800GX2 1GB » Here!! «
    [Review] EVGA GTX280 1GB GDDR3 » Here!! « .....[Review] Powercolor HD4870 512MB GDDR5 » Here!! «

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    317
    i dont think either of these card will have 128sp's, why because that would kill the sales of gtx and the utlra's. and being on a smaller process these would overclock like hell and no one is going to buy the gtx and ultra. we might see a refresh of the ultra with higher clocks. may be little more shaders.
    Q9450(VID 1.2375) 3.9GHX 488*8 1.32V LOADED
    Asus P5Q-E
    CRUCIAL BALLISTIX 3GB RUNNING@980MHZ 5-5-5-12
    RADEON HD 4870
    OCZ VENDETTA 2
    WINDOWS VISTA 32BIT
    average room temp 72-76c

  24. #74
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    63
    Good news for G92, but why are there no news on G90
    I still hope it's true that it will be out Q4 07.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  25. #75
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by Jass View Post
    Good news for G92, but why are there no news on G90
    I still hope it's true that it will be out Q4 07.
    It's looking increasingly unlikely.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •