Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 152

Thread: GF100 will be fastest GPU, Dual GPU Fermi is coming!

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    259

    GF100 will be fastest GPU, Dual GPU Fermi is coming!

    Donanimhaber.com talked with Luciano Alibrandi which is Director of PR at Nvidia. According to site, Alibrandi claims that Fermi based GPU (GF100) will be fastest GPU solution in the industry. There is still no spesific launch date of Fermi on the table but Alibrandi indicates CES 2010 to launch new generation technologies from Nvidia.
    http://vr-zone.com/forums/519373/gf1...s-coming-.html
    Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3

    http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench

    evga failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Can we just ban this guy? We don't need people coming in here claiming they know someone that's under NDA. Everything that comes out of this posters posts are nothing but delusions from a fanboy.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    If the performance is really good and it is as revolutionary as they imply, I know this might not be called for, but I hope they change the naming of this series entirely.

    E.g no more gtx 3xx because there is already cards like that on the market that share very little in common with these new directx 11 cards.

    This new series really needs to start on fresh ground and would represent an image change for the company, to show they are done with renaming(I know, I know).

    Anything that based on g92-g80 or g200 will stay in the gtx xxx nameset.

    Heck maybe even abandon the geforce moniker.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    259
    IMO this is PR at its best. whenever guru or someoe gets a hold of one and show benches then I will make a comment.
    Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3

    http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench

    evga failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Can we just ban this guy? We don't need people coming in here claiming they know someone that's under NDA. Everything that comes out of this posters posts are nothing but delusions from a fanboy.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    379
    They were the fastest last time too. The real question is will they be able to price competitively this time around.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Oh no, someone from NVIDIA (even worse, their director of PR) said GF100 will be teh fastest GPU, how surprising. I don't doubt GF100 will be faster than RV870, I just wonder why this is supposed to be news to any of us?

    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    If the performance is really good and it is as revolutionary as they imply, I know this might not be called for, but I hope they change the naming of this series entirely.
    Yeah right xD If they did that they'd just add another shipload of failure to their ocean full of fail they already have

    This naming scheme was "quite" recently introduced to make things easier and they renamed one card to the 300-series. If they'd put Fermi into a new naming scheme this renamed card would be all lonely and start to cry (and noone wants to call the whambulance).
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,247
    sounds good. now let's hope it's true and fermi will be released soon - at a reasonable price ofc
    1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile


    2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    466
    What else would the head of PR of nvidia say? If it was faster I would have expected a leak by now. In any case they are basing this on the 5800 series. By the time nvidia do release their card ati will have something else.
    Last edited by takamishanoku; 12-11-2009 at 04:33 PM.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by takamishanoku View Post
    What else would the head of PR of nvidia say? If it was faster I would have expected a leak by now.
    Maybe they are eying the 5890
    Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3

    http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench

    evga failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Can we just ban this guy? We don't need people coming in here claiming they know someone that's under NDA. Everything that comes out of this posters posts are nothing but delusions from a fanboy.

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    It would be a complete failure if it wasn't faster than 5870, so no news here, really...
    And a dual GPU solution? Will be tricky, and unlikely to come out any time soon IMO.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  10. #10
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by takamishanoku View Post
    What else would the head of PR of nvidia say? If it was faster I would have expected a leak by now.
    Agreed! they are too late for me (who bought 2 5970s already). I have to put my new system together before i can used both of them though. The only compliant I have about the drivers is powerplay does not work. That happened with the 4870x2 as well at launch. With a single 5970 I'm seeing frame rates at 2560x1600 I've never seen before, so I am one happy customer! Oh yeah opengl is working nicely! I haven't even overclocked the card either!


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Alibrandi claims that Fermi based GPU (GF100) will be fastest GPU solution (for what?) in the industry
    This statement could mean many things.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    It would be a complete failure if it wasn't faster than 5870, so no news here, really...
    And a dual GPU solution? Will be tricky, and unlikely to come out any time soon IMO.
    It would be a failure for a gpu to be released 1/2 later than the competition, and it isnt faster. Like the hd 2900

    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    Agreed! they are too late for me (who bought 2 5970s already). I have to put my new system together before i can used both of them though. The only compliant I have about the drivers is powerplay does not work. That happened with the 4870x2 as well at launch. With a single 5970 I'm seeing frame rates at 2560x1600 I've never seen before, so I am one happy customer! Oh yeah opengl is working nicely! I haven't even overclocked the card either!
    Show off
    Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3

    http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench

    evga failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Can we just ban this guy? We don't need people coming in here claiming they know someone that's under NDA. Everything that comes out of this posters posts are nothing but delusions from a fanboy.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Quote Originally Posted by FischOderAal View Post
    D

    This naming scheme was "quite" recently introduced to make things easier
    Of course, they went ahead and made it more complicated

    I mean GTX 280 and GTX 260 made sense, as did the refreshe GTX 285...

    But then they decided, hey let's add a GTX 260 Core 216

    Then lets go ahead and make a GTS 250, GT 240, GT 220, G210, etc.

    Shoulda just stuck with the numbers meaning one thing entirely, rather than changing the alphabets in front as well

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    uhmm they better be faster coming from 6 month behind you don't have any other option imho

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Toon
    Posts
    1,570
    C'MON lets see them squash 2x5970! Bring it on!
    Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.67GHz
    ASUS 6T Deluxe
    Powercolor 7970 @ 1050/1475
    12GB GSkill Ripjaws
    Antec 850W TruePower Quattro
    50" Full HD PDP
    Red Cosmos 1000

  16. #16
    Kolinahr Graduate
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    154
    The Geforce 8800GT was the last nVidia product I will ever buy - and even that was when the card was fresh/
    They've been acting "weird" (to say the least) in the past several months to half a year. They made a joke out of themselves.
    There is no reason to believe them now. Re-branding, renaming, showing fake cards..

    nVidia - "the way it is meant to be played". pffffff..
    I7 920 On Air! -->
    I7 920 @ DICE -->
    3770K @ DICE -->

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,064
    every thread arises from this "Fermi" is going to shove Nvidia higher up the wall, for if this is a plan for Nvidia to reel the curiosity of the users, it's gonna backfire if Nvidia is unable to deliver something worth the wait

  18. #18
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Serpentarius View Post
    every thread arises from this "Fermi" is going to shove Nvidia higher up the wall, for if this is a plan for Nvidia to reel the curiosity of the users, it's gonna backfire if Nvidia is unable to deliver something worth the wait

    It's already is not worth the wait. How many refreshes have they done lately? Anybody who is smart will get an ATI card this time around and wait for a Fermi refresh. Nvidia's attitude has been annoying lately: no Dx 10.1 support and no Dx11 support. The only thing Nvidia has done lately was the G80 and that was back in 06. It's been 3 years and Fermi is late and I would be shocked if they could release for sale by the end of January.


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    It's already is not worth the wait. How many refreshes have they done lately? Anybody who is smart will get an ATI card this time around and wait for a Fermi refresh. Nvidia's attitude has been annoying lately: no Dx 10.1 support and no Dx11 support. The only thing Nvidia has done lately was the G80 and that was back in 06. It's been 3 years and Fermi is late and I would be shocked if they could release for sale by the end of January.
    I think anyone smart will wait for fermi anyways and just wait to see what both cards offer. Likely at this point, quantities will be better for AMD cards and prices better.

    I could understand if there was some crazy directx 11 games or you had a directx 9 card. But stefan, didn't you have GTX 285 SLI or a gtx 295 or something?

    I guess this is why it is xtremesystems but to say smart people should buy an ATI card for this generation and not wait for fermi when waiting will only save them money(which is a certainty) and possibly get them a faster card just doesn't make sense.

    Maybe I misunderstood you and a person should not by a fermi based on what NV has done. That not a matter of being smart, but a matter of principals and emotions which is not the same. Frankly, I would rather be pragmatic and buy what is the fastest and also the best value regardless of the brand. I think this is the smartest course of action.

    Also if you just had crazy cash and just wanted to buy a piece of hardware, I would have purchased another monitor I were you. Either more 30" or 2 24 to flank your current monitor.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 12-11-2009 at 06:28 PM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    U.S of freakin' A
    Posts
    1,931
    Quote Originally Posted by safan80 View Post
    It's already is not worth the wait. How many refreshes have they done lately? Anybody who is smart will get an ATI card this time around and wait for a Fermi refresh. Nvidia's attitude has been annoying lately: no Dx 10.1 support and no Dx11 support. The only thing Nvidia has done lately was the G80 and that was back in 06. It's been 3 years and Fermi is late and I would be shocked if they could release for sale by the end of January.
    I'm kind of wrestling with the idea of buying an HD 5870 at the moment, after getting tired of waiting for the GTX 380.. I had one in the cart at Newegg the other day, but I cancelled it at the last minute.

    When I think about it, I don't really need it. My GTX 285 plays all the games I have at 2560x1600 perfectly, with the exception of Crysis but I don't even have that installed. Even upcoming games like Mass Effect 2 should play well on the GTX 285..

    The consolization of games has meant that video cards can be in service for much longer before the need to upgrade arises.
    Intel Core i7 6900K
    Noctua NH-D15
    Asus X99A II
    32 GB G.Skill TridentZ @ 3400 CL15 CR1
    NVidia Titan Xp
    Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5
    Sennheiser HD-598
    Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
    Western Digital Raptor 600GB
    Asus 12x Blu-Ray Burner
    Sony Optiarc 24x DVD Burner with NEC chipset
    Antec HCP-1200w Power Supply
    Viewsonic XG2703-GS
    Thermaltake Level 10 GT Snow Edition
    Logitech G502 gaming mouse w/Razer Exact Mat
    Logitech G910 mechanical gaming keyboard
    Windows 8 x64 Pro

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    259
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I think anyone smart will wait for fermi anyways and just wait to see what both cards offer. Likely at this point, quantities will be better for AMD cards and prices better.

    I could understand if there was some crazy directx 11 games or you had a directx 9 card. But stefan, didn't you have GTX 285 SLI or a gtx 295 or something?

    I guess this is why it is xtremesystems but to say smart people should buy an ATI card for this generation and not wait for fermi when waiting will only save them money(which is a certainty) and possibly get them a faster card just doesn't make sense.

    Maybe I misunderstood you and a person should not by a fermi based on what NV has done. That not a matter of being smart, but a matter of principals and emotions which is not the same. Frankly, I would rather be pragmatic and buy what is the fastest and also the best value regardless of the brand. I think this is the smartest course of action.
    maybe I am not smart, but 6 months is too long for me to wait for a card seeing that i change cards every 4 - 5months . By then I will be wanting to wait for 6000 series.
    Phenon II x4 955 (3.7ghz)/athlon II x2 245 (3.7ghz), Mugen 2 , gigabyte 790xt ud4p, 5770 1000/1420 , 4GB ddr3

    http://superclock.mysmf.com 5770 1ghz bench

    evga failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Can we just ban this guy? We don't need people coming in here claiming they know someone that's under NDA. Everything that comes out of this posters posts are nothing but delusions from a fanboy.

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Carfax View Post
    I'm kind of wrestling with the idea of buying an HD 5870 at the moment, after getting tired of waiting for the GTX 380.. I had one in the cart at Newegg the other day, but I cancelled it at the last minute.

    When I think about it, I don't really need it. My GTX 285 plays all the games I have at 2560x1600 perfectly, with the exception of Crysis but I don't even have that installed. Even upcoming games like Mass Effect 2 should play well on the GTX 285..

    The consolization of games has meant that video cards can be in service for much longer before the need to upgrade arises.
    This is true. However, next year we will have a reason to get a DX11 card. For me, it's BF:BC2 and its DX11 goodness. For others it's AvP.

    One thing's for sure.. if those 2 games mentioned did not have DX11, I would still keep my GTX260 without worries of upgrading.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I think anyone smart will wait for fermi anyways and just wait to see what both cards offer. Likely at this point, quantities will be better for AMD cards and prices better.

    I could understand if there was some crazy directx 11 games or you had a directx 9 card. But stefan, didn't you have GTX 285 SLI or a gtx 295 or something?

    I guess this is why it is xtremesystems but to say smart people should buy an ATI card for this generation and not wait for fermi when waiting will only save them money(which is a certainty) and possibly get them a faster card just doesn't make sense.

    Maybe I misunderstood you and a person should not by a fermi based on what NV has done. That not a matter of being smart, but a matter of principals and emotions which is not the same. Frankly, I would rather be pragmatic and buy what is the fastest and also the best value regardless of the brand. I think this is the smartest course of action.
    How much is 3-4 months of your gaming life worth? For people in the market just smart to buy now. Only time worth waiting is 1 month or less.


    Here's a scenario for 2 gamers. First gamer bought 5870 on release. 2nd guy waited till Fermi. Even at the most optimal best case scenario of 30% faster Fermi to 5870 the second guy will most likely pay a little more but here's the real kicker: The first guy got to play on the fastest single gpu, few DX11 games, and also had an option to use Eyeinfinity all 4+ months while 2nd guy who waited was stuck with old tech.

    By that time first gamer will then have option to offload his now 4+ month old video card and get either the Fermi or AMD refresh. Its a no brainer ...Welcome to XtremeSystems.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by skugpezz View Post
    maybe I am not smart, but 6 months is too long for me to wait for a card seeing that i change cards every 4 - 5months . By then I will be wanting to wait for 6000 series.
    It honestly depends on what card you had before this generation.

    What card did you have?

    Fermi not going to have much on the low end initially, so going 5770 can make sense since the wait is going to be longer, and from your choice of the 5770, your not buying ultra high end and its likely you had something slower than a 4870. So there might be tangible notices in games aside from crysis.

    If you did have a 4870 or 4890 or a gtx 260-285, that would be a poor poor upgrade and a waste of money.

    If you had something like a 3870 or even a 8800gt, I can understand the upgrade.

    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    How much is 3-4 months of your gaming life worth? For people in the market just smart to buy now. Only time worth waiting is 1 month or less.


    Here's a scenario for 2 gamers. First gamer bought 5870 on release. 2nd guy waited till Fermi. Even at the most optimal best case scenario of 30% faster Fermi to 5870 the second guy will most likely pay a little more but here's the real kicker: The first guy got to play on the fastest single gpu, few DX11 games, and also had an option to use Eyeinfinity all 4+ months while 2nd guy who waited was stuck with old tech.

    By that time first gamer will then have option to offload his now 4+ month old video card and get either the Fermi or AMD refresh. Its a no brainer ...Welcome to XtremeSystems.
    I think it always a poor decision to buy at scalped prices, that simply throwing money away and falling victim to the hype.

    Its kind of a elitist thing to say you were able to enjoy 16x AA and 16x AF instead of 8x AA and 16x AF. Direct x11, its irrelevant at the moment until more games came out and if dirt2 is any indication, game programmed specifically to take advantage of directx 11 might be to slow to run on max settings.

    This is not CPU, where time is money, so it not an investment, this is gaming.

    What benchzowner has hinted at, people wanting to play alien vs predator on high settings are going to be in for a shocker with cypress and directx 11. Considering dirt2 runs at 48 FPS at 1920*1200 with 4aa and 16 af, it might be smart to wait for a faster card.

    http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,7...ults/Practice/

    What happens if the 5870 is too slow for future directx 11 games? If there was games to really take advantage of directx 11 and the games that need speed beyond SLI gtx 285(aside from crysis), I could understand kadozer, but there isn't really any.

    Building on my original argument, what if someone buying a fermi is better set for the longterm(instead of the short term benefit in your scenario(and the little benefit at that)), so instead of waiting a bit, the person who is bought a 5870, is stuck with a might be too slow for the future, or not offer the best visual possible on future titles.

    I think a smarter thing for stefan to say ignoring emotion on stefan part is this. Smart people will buy fermi or wait for the 5890 or r8xx refresh. That way, people buy a product that is price in a market that has competition and by that time, more directx 11 titles will be out. In addition, someone doing the above is likely to enjoy much longer term benefits than short term benefits involving crysis(depending on the hardware they had before) and a couple of directx 11 titles.

    The direct x11 speed of dirt 2 should be frightening to 5870 owners.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 12-11-2009 at 07:00 PM.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  25. #25
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post

    Maybe I misunderstood you and a person should not by a fermi based on what NV has done. That not a matter of being smart, but a matter of principals and emotions which is not the same. Frankly, I would rather be pragmatic and buy what is the fastest and also the best value regardless of the brand. I think this is the smartest course of action.
    So your going to wait 6 months while the 5xxx series is out now? ATI has the fastest card and best value at the moment. Nvidia has not released a new high end product for a year already. I would rather play games than wait for Nvidia's Fermi. Cmon they had to go as far as making a mock up of a card that does not even exist. Ever since that moment I've had my doubts about nvidia's Fermi. Nvidia's drivers have also been suffering there's issues at my res( video playback issues) that did not exist 4 months ago, and also they've managed to remove support for a bunch of game. You can sit around for a fat pig to do something, but he's only going to get fatter.


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •