Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 127

Thread: Quad Core Round Up: AMD Vs Intel Clock to Clock(deneb vs agena + deneb vs intel)

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212

    Quad Core Round Up: AMD Vs Intel Clock to Clock(deneb vs agena + deneb vs intel)

    As i had promised here about the clock to clock comparison....

    finally here it is...

    http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253

    Its in greek(again) but full of charts so its easy to understand what we are saying and whats going on.
    Here is a link withgoogle translator

    Deneb vs Bloomfield vs Yorkfield vs Kentsfield
    225*16.5 __169*22____411*9______411*9

    and

    Deneb vs agena @ 3.0Ghz deneb with 1800nb clock as it is by default and agena(9950BE) 200*15.

    Best wishes for the new year from HwBox team

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    393
    Little slower than Kentsfield clock for clock but overall pretty good. Great review!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,005
    Excellent work there man
    Core i7 3770K
    EVGA GTX780 + Surround
    EVGA GTX670
    EVGA Z77 FTW
    8GB (2x4GB) G.Skill 1600Mhz DDR3
    Ultra X3 1000w PSU PSU
    Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Thermaltake Xaser VI

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    319
    Many thanks Overclocker_gr.
    Great effort.

    Deneb looks good.

    3DMarknn - 79506/96025/33499/25592

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    power consumption seems kinda high. Strange to me....seems more like the power consumption of Agena. Did you measure the power for Agena systems? Agena must be using a TON of power if these are true.

    edit: so it was all at 3.7ghz? I was wondering why the idle power consumption is so high. How much voltage was needed on the Phenom 2 for 3.7ghz?
    Last edited by ryboto; 01-03-2009 at 07:17 PM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Kentsfield still looking pretty good
    Are we there yet?

  7. #7
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    You're the man, OverClocker_gr! Thank you for all your hard work!

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    463
    i call some bull because there should have been ddr2 on yorkfield or kentsfeild
    amd 720
    M4A78T-E
    i gig of crap
    visionek 4850
    seagate 320 GB 7200.10
    WD 640 GB
    swiftech MCR320 swiftech MCP355
    Apogee GTZ
    XPSC Restop


    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    I can say one thing I learned out of all this, I am not buying any Intel SSDs thats for sure...

  9. #9
    Nerdy Powerlifter
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Down in the Bayou
    Posts
    4,553
    Reconfirms my purchase of my q6600 being epic.

    Its just mind blowing that even now, AMD has not caught up to Kentsfield. Good step in the right direction though.
    You must [not] advance.


    Current Rig: i7 4790k @ stock (**** TIM!) , Zotac GTX 1080 WC'd 2214mhz core / 5528mhz Mem, Asus z-97 Deluxe

    Heatware

  10. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    I'm looking at the cinebench 10 score it looks low like the cpu isn't oc at all ?

    I don't see a Oc comparison anywhere.... ?
    (comparing Hondaguy sine bench with just a Nb bump it's AMD section "AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review [UPDATED with more tests])
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    I'm looking at the cinebench 10 score it looks low like the cpu isn't oc at all ?
    Every graph has been updated with all chips at 3.7GHz.

    Kentsfield beats out Deneb 95% of the time. Wow. I'm pretty disappointed. Was looking forward to another AMD system, but looks like I'll be dropping a Yorkfield into my current platform.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    117
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    As i had promised here about the clock to clock comparison....

    finally here it is...

    http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3253

    Its in greek(again) but full of charts so its easy to understand what we are saying and whats going on.
    Here is a link withgoogle translator

    Deneb vs Bloomfield vs Yorkfield vs Kentsfield
    225*16.5 __169*22____411*9______411*9

    and

    Deneb vs agena @ 3.0Ghz deneb with 1800nb clock as it is by default and agena(9950BE) 200*15.

    Best wishes for the new year from HwBox team
    All run at 3.0Ghz !not > 3.6Ghz !
    When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
    When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
    When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
    When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)
    by John Fruehe

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by YukonTrooper View Post
    Every graph has been updated with all chips at 3.7GHz.

    Kentsfield beats out Deneb 95% of the time. Wow. I'm pretty disappointed. Was looking forward to another AMD system, but looks like I'll be dropping a Yorkfield into my current platform.
    hmmmm 95%? seems a little large of a number. plus not all q6600s will oc to 3.7 when it appears that is at least an average for deneb.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,036
    That pretty much confirms what I already knew. A complete slaughter. I hope I'm wrong, but from where I'm sitting I'm seeing the end of AMD, and the beginning of huge price increases and complete market takeover.

    They needed to launch a competitive product, and instead launched something that is basically competing with 3 generation old technology. I knew it was bad, but I never would've dreamed they fall even further behind like this with so much at stake.

    Man, this has me totally bummed out now. <sigh> Damn, I'm shocked. I am so shocked I suspended in disbelief right now. Man, I've been fired up all day and on top of the world, and I wish I had never seen that. If I thought it would help I'd just buy an ATi card and a CPU just to help, but I can't buy enough of them alone. It's gonna take more than there are of us even. It's gonna take Joe Public too in the Million's to help them out it.

    I don't know...I'm rambling becasue I'm beside myself right now wondering how things got this dang bad.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by vietthanhpro View Post
    All run at 3.0Ghz !not > 3.6Ghz !
    You can clearly see all chips running at 3.7GHz, followed by Deneb/Agena at 3.0GHZ compared at the bottom of every page.

    Stop being a nuisance and posting wasted space.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  16. #16
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by vietthanhpro View Post
    All run at 3.0Ghz !not > 3.6Ghz !
    good I'm not the only one lol, I keep looking for the cpu bench #2 for deneb but I see a one deneb on every screen and only a second one showing higher resolutions....

    it's list look this

    deneb in green
    bloomfeild Ht On blue
    bloomfield HT Off sky blue
    yorkfeild orange
    conroe red

    next one is just higher resolution.


    the agena vs deneb is there.
    that's all I see and I'm pretty show all those scores are stock.

    Quote Originally Posted by HondaGuy View Post


    The Stock CPU---- NB/HT@2000
    Quote Originally Posted by HondaGuy View Post
    PROOF!!

    Hondaguy is on water.

    maybe there was a bios issues ??

    or AOD loaded it back to stock on him...
    Last edited by demonkevy666; 01-03-2009 at 08:00 PM.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    463
    you cant call that a slaughter considering amd beat the i7 in a few benches and tied it in a few more.
    amd 720
    M4A78T-E
    i gig of crap
    visionek 4850
    seagate 320 GB 7200.10
    WD 640 GB
    swiftech MCR320 swiftech MCP355
    Apogee GTZ
    XPSC Restop


    Quote Originally Posted by road-runner View Post
    I can say one thing I learned out of all this, I am not buying any Intel SSDs thats for sure...

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by vietthanhpro View Post
    All run at 3.0Ghz !not > 3.6Ghz !
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    good I'm not the only one lol, I keep looking for the cpu bench #2 for deneb but I see a one deneb on every screen and only a second one showing higher resolutions....

    it's list look this

    deneb in green
    bloomfeild Ht On blue
    bloomfield HT Off sky blue
    yorkfeild orange
    conroe red

    next one is just higher resolution.


    the agena vs deneb is there.
    that's all I see and I'm pretty show all those scores are stock.
    tell me 2 screenshots that you want from deneb scores @ 3.7ghz(225*16.5 nb clock & ht link @ 2250 to provide to you right now.


    Your proof is @ 64bit.
    I was running 32bit.
    Next time read more careful

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Bangalore
    Posts
    96
    Very good review , but Ill wait for some more reviews.
    AMD Phenom II X550BE @ X4 3.8Ghz | Asus Crosshair V Formula | Gskill F3-16000CL9-8GBRM | 2 X Saphire 4850 in Crossfire | Asus Xonar D2x | Corsair HX750 | Silverstone Raven rv-01

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    That pretty much confirms what I already knew. A complete slaughter. I hope I'm wrong, but from where I'm sitting I'm seeing the end of AMD, and the beginning of huge price increases and complete market takeover.

    They needed to launch a competitive product, and instead launched something that is basically competing with 3 generation old technology. I knew it was bad, but I never would've dreamed they fall even further behind like this with so much at stake.

    Man, this has me totally bummed out now. <sigh> Damn, I'm shocked. I am so shocked I suspended in disbelief right now. Man, I've been fired up all day and on top of the world, and I wish I had never seen that. If I thought it would help I'd just buy an ATi card and a CPU just to help, but I can't buy enough of them alone. It's gonna take more than there are of us even. It's gonna take Joe Public too in the Million's to help them out it.

    I don't know...I'm rambling becasue I'm beside myself right now wondering how things got this dang bad.
    just because someone's product isn't the performance leader doesn't mean they aren't competitive at all. deneb looks good and with some more reviews and different benchmarks it will tell a lot more. the chip looks to have a lot of overclocking headroom as well.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    hmmmm 95%? seems a little large of a number. plus not all q6600s will oc to 3.7 when it appears that is at least an average for deneb.
    I didn't calculate it, but it's definitely in the high range. Remember, that's only for these specific benchmarks at 3.7GHz. My comments are reflective of what's seen in this updated review and nothing else.

    Anyways, I really hope Deneb can clock at a consistent 4.0GHz+ on air, because that will make a considerable difference in our part of the market, but even so, that only *possibly* edges out Kentsfield. Then you have to take Yorkfield into consideration, which, as far as we can tell, clocks very similar to Deneb. Intel will likely drop prices on Yorkfield once Deneb saturates retail, so it will really make things hard on Deneb, at least by users like me that already have LGA775 and are looking to upgrade.

    Hopefully AMD can sign some big server contracts, as I am not looking forward to no competition in the market.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  22. #22
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    tell me 2 screenshots that you want from deneb scores @ 3.7ghz(225*16.5 nb clock & ht link @ 2250 to provide to you right now.


    Your proof is @ 64bit.
    I was running 32bit.
    Next time read more careful
    ok
    I did read
    it just says "OS: vista ultimate sp1"

    no mentioning of 32 bit or 64 bit

    no worries I don't use 32 bit

    I wonder if any games will be different in 64 bit then.


    sidenote most liked bench for me
    Generic CPU bench is where it's at it's small simple easy to run and takes it own screen shot
    Last edited by demonkevy666; 01-03-2009 at 08:13 PM.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    ok
    I did read
    it just says "OS: vista ultimate sp1"

    no mentioning of 32 bit or 64 bit

    no worries I don't use 32 bit

    I wonder if any games will be different in 64 bit then.

    Generic CPU bench is where it's at lol
    "vista ultimate sp1" is by default the 32bit version.
    if i was saying vista ultimate x64 sp1 it will be 64bit.

    no there is no difference since none of the 3d game are native 64bit.

    Only native 64bit aplications are gaining and phenom ii closes the gap.

    And dont stuck always at cinebench.Its just a bench that amd is doing great,nothing more nothing less

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by YukonTrooper View Post
    I didn't calculate it, but it's definitely in the high range. Remember, that's only for these specific benchmarks at 3.7GHz. My comments are reflective of what's seen in this updated review and nothing else.

    Anyways, I really hope Deneb can clock at a consistent 4.0GHz+ on air, because that will make a considerable difference in our part of the market, but even so, that only *possibly* edges out Kentsfield. Then you have to take Yorkfield into consideration, which, as far as we can tell, clocks very similar to Deneb. Intel will likely drop prices on Yorkfield once Deneb saturates retail, so it will really make things hard on Deneb, at least by users like me that already have LGA775 and are looking to upgrade.

    Hopefully AMD can sign some big server contracts, as I am not looking forward to no competition in the market.
    current amd users will have no need to switch unless they feel like they should get i7 and even if the performance of yorkfield and deneb are the same no one will want to upgrade to a dead platform especially when deneb's platform will be cheaper. i don't see deneb coming out and being amazing but i do believe it will increase amd's market share from what it is now.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    current amd users will have no need to switch unless they feel like
    But then neither will current Intel users have any need to switch to AMD in light of the performance and power usage of Phenom II. And given the last 2.5 years, this favors Intel.

    i don't see deneb coming out and being amazing but i do believe it will increase amd's market share from what it is now.
    I don't see it doing much more than Agena did. AMD has never done well financially without the performance lead.

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •